Quote:
Originally Posted by heavychevy
You made up half of that paragraph. The guy was a rally driver, the test was in Australia, not willow springs, on a dusty track, and the guy did not have extensive experience in a GT2.
Could you be any more desperate?
The fact is that the GT2 is substantially faster, period, point blank. And no matter how many random tests pop up with biased media (which we know is huge in Australia for the GT-R, though they try to act differently), beating a GT2, everyone knows the true story.
|
So first it's the American media that is biased towards the GTR, then it's the UK media, and now it's the Australian media? What's next - the whole world?
Okay, so i made a mistake - it was tested in Australia by a rally driver. But the fact remains that he is a professional driver and he had experience in the GT2 before.
And the fact still remains that the GTR beat the GT2 by more than 2 secs on the same track, same day, same driver. What makes the caning more remarkable was the fact that the GT2 was a prep car provided by Porsche, and the GTR was a privately owned import. Must've been a ringer eh?
Oh by the way, wheels magazine in Australia has always had a soft spot for Porsches. Porsches have been winning their 'performance car of the year' tests nearly every single year. So don't go around saying that the Australian magazines are biased towards the GTR.