6speed Technical Information forum This area is intended for members to post their technical questions that will be answered by anonymous experts posting as 411. Members may provide knowledge but sponsors are asked to not post in this forum.

Alignment for lowered 996 Turbo for street

  #1  
Old 03-23-2014, 06:18 PM
nick49's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,062
Rep Power: 104
nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !
Alignment for lowered 996 Turbo for street

I have a low mile <26K 996 Turbo Cab. My tires are fairly fresh and on 18" wheels. I just today installed a set of new KW V1 coilovers and set them to the maximum lowered position. I drove around for about 15 miles. Hub center to fender measures 12 5/8" all around.

The car felt quite good, alignment feels OK as the car handles quite well and goes straight as an arrow. I'm uncertain about camber and toe and plan to have an extremely capable indy shop that has done SCCA racers cars for decades and all my previous sports cars as well do a 4 wheel alignment.

I'm asking for recommendations on alignment numbers. Tire wear is most important followed by good handling. I will never track or race this car.
 

Last edited by nick49; 06-23-2014 at 11:37 AM.
  #2  
Old 04-06-2014, 11:06 AM
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: la
Posts: 7,971
Rep Power: 601
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
in very general terms i *would* have suggested that you begin with the gt2 or x73 numbers given your properly running on 18's? but the kw's might change all that given there is much more adjustment that can be had, than with the x73 or gt2 setups ( stock )

if i can offer one piece of advice if you ever DO decide to go rwd as i just have? don't even think about it without some kind of lsd to deal with the rt rear wheel spin that will invariably result. it's nasty without an lsd and i tried it for a week! lol

once you've nailed that? it is a COMPLETELY different car. handling/power to ground-wise. hands down best mod possible, regardless of intended use or driving style condition(s).
 
  #3  
Old 04-06-2014, 01:04 PM
nick49's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,062
Rep Power: 104
nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
in very general terms i *would* have suggested that you begin with the gt2 or x73 numbers given your properly running on 18's? but the kw's might change all that given there is much more adjustment that can be had, than with the x73 or gt2 setups ( stock )

if i can offer one piece of advice if you ever DO decide to go rwd as i just have? don't even think about it without some kind of lsd to deal with the rt rear wheel spin that will invariably result. it's nasty without an lsd and i tried it for a week! lol

once you've nailed that? it is a COMPLETELY different car. handling/power to ground-wise. hands down best mod possible, regardless of intended use or driving style condition(s).
Thanks!

So the open diff without a LSD is not worth it? I would not mind pulling my front diff and removing my front axles at the CV joint, but I don't think I'm ready to get inside the rear diff and fit an LSD unit. I wrench all day and don't mind a bit here and there, but it can be never ending. That's why my TT has remained bone stock until I fit the KWs.
 
  #4  
Old 04-06-2014, 01:12 PM
nick49's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,062
Rep Power: 104
nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !
I increased the ride height from max low, up 4 turns on the front spring collars, 5 on the rear. This decreased my neg camber and I think changed my toe as well and gave me more rake. Car tracks better, steering seems quicker, handling is great. No alignment as of yet. I've not put 50 miles on the car since the shock change.

I'm in the process of building my own dogbones which are nearly done, did a test fit yesterday. I will be fabbing my adjustable rear toe links as well with bump steer correction pins. If I decide to leave the car raised up a bit from the max drop I may not need these to get correct alignment.

I have researched the alignment and have an idea where I want to be.
 
  #5  
Old 04-06-2014, 07:42 PM
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: la
Posts: 7,971
Rep Power: 601
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by nick49
Thanks!

So the open diff without a LSD is not worth it? I would not mind pulling my front diff and removing my front axles at the CV joint, but I don't think I'm ready to get inside the rear diff and fit an LSD unit. I wrench all day and don't mind a bit here and there, but it can be never ending. That's why my TT has remained bone stock until I fit the KWs.
nick no it's def not worth it to keep it open diff without a lsd, but given your capabilities with wrenching? i would just pull the cardan one weekend and spin around awhile lol.. and if you're like me, you feel the capabilities and end up springing for the full setup. it will require puling the g'box obviously, and i had some issues that necessitated my opening all that stuff up. so once there? this was a no brainer but the one i got was 1300 delivered. it is next to a tune? the best mod i can even imagine. it's that good.

all the cpl weeks running it open did was convince me to go the wavertrac tbd..and i studied as quick as i could on the different types of "real" lsd's eg guards vs giken/oem gt3 etc etc, and anyone says that isn't the sh*t for a multi puprose car? just hasn't run it yet!

ps... i also realize i have zero business posting in this section of the forum LOL. but i do hope the info helps. but take the cardan out for a week and run a cpl canyons

cheers.
 
  #6  
Old 06-18-2014, 08:19 PM
DaveCarrera4S's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 671
Rep Power: 72
DaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond reputeDaveCarrera4S has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by nick49
I increased the ride height from max low, up 4 turns on the front spring collars, 5 on the rear. This decreased my neg camber and I think changed my toe as well and gave me more rake. Car tracks better, steering seems quicker, handling is great. No alignment as of yet. I've not put 50 miles on the car since the shock change.

I'm in the process of building my own dogbones which are nearly done, did a test fit yesterday. I will be fabbing my adjustable rear toe links as well with bump steer correction pins. If I decide to leave the car raised up a bit from the max drop I may not need these to get correct alignment.

I have researched the alignment and have an idea where I want to be.
Here is what I did after lowering the car. Made a table in excel of ride height vs factory alignment specs. Found that my car was even lower than GT2 spec ( lowest factory spec). So I extrapolated those values that were linear, others were step functions, and I was close enough to GT2 height that they were fine. Gave numbers to shop, they dialed it all in on the Hunter. If you want the spreadsheet, pm me.
 
  #7  
Old 06-18-2014, 09:35 PM
nick49's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,062
Rep Power: 104
nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by DaveCarrera4S
Here is what I did after lowering the car. Made a table in excel of ride height vs factory alignment specs. Found that my car was even lower than GT2 spec ( lowest factory spec). So I extrapolated those values that were linear, others were step functions, and I was close enough to GT2 height that they were fine. Gave numbers to shop, they dialed it all in on the Hunter. If you want the spreadsheet, pm me.
PMed

How did you lower? What other components did you change? And are you happy with the results of your alignment?

Any issues with bump steer? Did you check it and or address it?

Thanks, Nick
 
  #8  
Old 03-01-2015, 11:22 AM
THaines's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
THaines is on a distinguished road
996 turbo hunter alignment printouts

Could you post the hunter alignment printout?
 
  #9  
Old 03-01-2015, 01:58 PM
nick49's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,062
Rep Power: 104
nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !
FWIW, I had my car pro aligned by the best shop in the city. Used them for over 20 years for problematic vehicles. My car drives perfect in every respect. I understand alignments pretty darned well, aligned my old Jag XKE after rebuilding the suspension and also my lifted Jeeps in the driveway. Did may others over the last 40 years as well.

So, I did make my adj dogbones for the upper rear and roughed them in as well as my other specs. The pro shop did the final and the results are L&R:

F Caster 8.46
8.51
F Camber - 0.71
- 0.73
F Toe 0.04
0.04
total 0.08

R Camber -1.22
-1.20
R Toe 0.13
0.14
Total 0.27

The above are all in degrees

Secondary

Setback F -0.11"
R -0.29"

Wheelbase diff 0.18"

My car feels very neutral with light steering and no hint of bump steer. I thought I may have to make adj r toe links but did not.
 
  #10  
Old 03-01-2015, 03:26 PM
THaines's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
THaines is on a distinguished road
Here is my current 2004 turbo x50 cab alignment.

https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/JkpzFNi3aH60gZJuM8dAT2En4Gwk7IT3R5-q_lyXWOw?feat=directlink
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vividracing
996 Turbo / GT2
5
10-06-2015 05:20 AM
PelicanParts.com
996 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
08-20-2015 02:40 PM
PelicanParts.com
GT3/GT2/GT Vendor Classifieds
0
08-20-2015 02:37 PM
PelicanParts.com
996 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
08-18-2015 03:43 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Alignment for lowered 996 Turbo for street



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.