996 Turbo / GT2Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2004 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2. Sponsored By Vivid Racing
Welcome to 6SpeedOnline.com!
Welcome to 6SpeedOnline.com.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join 6SpeedOnline.com today!
I'd have been interested in the difference (dynos) between an optimized K24 (ie exhaust, EPL tune, FPR) as compared to the same but with the new turbos.
I'm curious how a completely stock car that is rated 450 flywheel hp stock is putting down 450whp?
Even in rwd mode, that seems a bit strange, maybe you could shed some light on this?
Could it be possible the car was already flashed with the stock turbos?
A drop of water has nothing on me
when it comes to being shallow! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
We have packages that we are working up right now. Shoot me a PM with what you have done to the car and I can get you a quote on what you will need to put on our new Billet K16
In for the exhaust note. I want a more aggressive exhaust
I will try to get some exhaust sound clips up here very shortly for everyone
Quote:
Originally Posted by vrybad
I'm curious how a completely stock car that is rated 450 flywheel hp stock is putting down 450whp?
Even in rwd mode, that seems a bit strange, maybe you could shed some light on this?
Could it be possible the car was already flashed with the stock turbos?
This car was completely bone stock. We were surprised too but our dyno never lies. Some have even called our dyno a bit on the low side. All we know is what when the Hp numbers are compared to trap speeds they are dead on where they should be. I have poked around quite a bit and from what I have read the X50 package is underrated for HP. There have been estimates that its closer to 490....but that is just rumor. Again all we can go by is what the car puts down for power on our dyno.
Not a special dyno at all. Just a dynojet 424X.The mustang dyno local to us reads higher than our dynojet. Like I said our numbers are always in line with a cars trap speed on a drag strip....trap speeds do not lie.
I think its clear the X50 is underated for HP at the claimed 450whp. Also keep in mind this was dynoed in 2wd mode as previously stated so I am sure that will help a little on drivetrain loss.
We have not run this car yet at the track but we will shortly. I was speaking regarding the countless cars we have tuned at tested on our dyno over the years.
I promise there is nothing shady going on here. Maybe we just have a really strong car... We just slapped it on the rollers and did a few baseline pulls.
I will try to get some exhaust sound clips up here very shortly for everyone
This car was completely bone stock. We were surprised too but our dyno never lies. Some have even called our dyno a bit on the low side. All we know is what when the Hp numbers are compared to trap speeds they are dead on where they should be. I have poked around quite a bit and from what I have read the X50 package is underrated for HP. There have been estimates that its closer to 490....but that is just rumor. Again all we can go by is what the car puts down for power on our dyno.
A drop of water has nothing on me
when it comes to being shallow! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Linear Mode
