Lower Lip on Turbo's front bumper.
#16
04-19-2005, 03:31 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 15,576
Rep Power: 680 
Originally posted by Ruiner
The TT lip looks like a very cheap piece on a very expensive car. The C4S lip, on the other hand, is constructed very well and "looks" like a more quality part.
The TT lip looks like a very cheap piece on a very expensive car. The C4S lip, on the other hand, is constructed very well and "looks" like a more quality part.
#17
04-19-2005, 03:46 PM
I also replaced by Turbo lip with a C4S lip. I paid $130 from Brandywine Porsche. I agree with the others that it looks much better - like Porsche actually designed for the car instead of just an afterthought.
#18
04-19-2005, 05:03 PM
grass is always greener....
i got a replacement tt lip anyways.
280 is what i was charged.
i think i may go with the aero lip in another year if it gets chewed up too bad again!
i got a replacement tt lip anyways.
280 is what i was charged.
i think i may go with the aero lip in another year if it gets chewed up too bad again!
#19
04-19-2005, 07:49 PM
Originally posted by 20C4S
now u see what i'm saying. i was just told by a 4S owner that the lip looks cheap compare to the turbo one.
now u see what i'm saying. i was just told by a 4S owner that the lip looks cheap compare to the turbo one.
#20
04-19-2005, 09:15 PM
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Age: 57
Posts: 1,935
Rep Power: 105 
#24
04-19-2005, 11:14 PM
I view the lip spoiler as disposable wear items, they are cheap anyway.
After a few airborne excursions, my front lip spoiler is getting pretty chewed up. I don't think it'll last another year...
After a few airborne excursions, my front lip spoiler is getting pretty chewed up. I don't think it'll last another year...
#26
04-19-2005, 11:42 PM
Originally posted by 20C4S
nope. the bottom of both bumpers are completely different.
nope. the bottom of both bumpers are completely different.
all the other lips look cheap and out of place.
#27
04-20-2005, 12:29 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 15,576
Rep Power: 680
Originally posted by collin996tt
there's a biz opportunity for u, arling. make a gt2 like lip for the tt and you'll have many happy customers.
all the other lips look cheap and out of place.
there's a biz opportunity for u, arling. make a gt2 like lip for the tt and you'll have many happy customers.
all the other lips look cheap and out of place.
GT2 lip like nothing & no one will like it. it looks the cheapest among them all.
#28
04-20-2005, 12:31 AM
Originally posted by 20C4S
collin,
GT2 lip like nothing & no one will like it. it looks the cheapest among them all.
collin,
GT2 lip like nothing & no one will like it. it looks the cheapest among them all.
#29
04-20-2005, 12:38 AM
Originally posted by SilverTTCab
the aerokit looks just like the tt lip, no?
the aerokit looks just like the tt lip, no?
-Scott
#30
04-20-2005, 12:49 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 15,576
Rep Power: 680
well, u think it looks good because the bumper design looks much better to start with. the lip is rather plain. see how much wider the lower bumper looks compare to TT/C4S. i miss this car.
btw, anyone notice the GT2-like TT on top right corner of the page needs a lip, rear bumper & half wing.
btw, anyone notice the GT2-like TT on top right corner of the page needs a lip, rear bumper & half wing.