You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join 6SpeedOnline.com today!
Agree with S2Kev...you can't go wrong with either watch...both are stunning watches...the IWC slightly larger at 42mm...but both look great dressed up with a suit or with a pair of jeans and a tshirt...
I've decided between these 2 options for my daily watch. Which one would you choose?
The Rolex will cost me an extra $1800. Is it worth it the extra?
Here's some pics for reference:
If you haven't seen either in person I recommend you do... A few months ago I had my mind set on the same IWC you are looking at (looks amazing in photos), but after seeing it in person, I felt it lacked something. So I went for the GMT II-C and couldn't be any happier.
__________________
2006 Porsche Cayenne S - Custom exhaust, Fabspeed tips, Gemballa 20" black Racing wheels.
2007 Toyota Camry SE V6
2009 Suzuki GSX-R600
I've never been a big Rolex fan; however, I do really like the Yachmaster and the Milgauss (specifically the one w/the green crystal). They stand out from not only other Rolex watches, but other watches in general IMO. It's ultimately your call, but I'd do the Milgauss. I prefer the looks of it and for a daily watch you won't have to worry about the longevity of the metal bracelet.
I agree with most of you guys, this IWC on pics looks amazing but saw one today in person and it lacks some balls. It's nothing like the pics. On the other hand I now found another piece: IWC Ingenieur Chronograph
Now I'm in torn on this IWC. Looks amazing IMO. What do you guys think?
Also for a daily watch, the bracelet might come in handy.
__________________ E46 M3 Vert AA HKS SC Stg 2, Porsche Cayenne / 997S