991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2015 M3 vs 991 3.4

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2014 | 01:17 PM
  #1  
tromero's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 358
From: Miami
Rep Power: 40
tromero is a splendid one to beholdtromero is a splendid one to beholdtromero is a splendid one to beholdtromero is a splendid one to beholdtromero is a splendid one to beholdtromero is a splendid one to beholdtromero is a splendid one to behold
2015 M3 vs 991 3.4

So since I have long been complaining about the 991 I have had a luke warm relationship with for 3yrs I decided to go test drive a brand new manual tranny M3. My thoughts:


The M3 has a really nice interior with the exception of the cheap headliner. The seats I found to be more comfortable than my sport seats in the 991. The clutch on the M3 is feather light and I much prefer the 991. The transmission is a bit spongy on the M3 and I again prefer my 991. Where the BMW shines in the motor. I opened the hood and wow, it looks gorgeous complete with carbon fiber. It's a work of art. I put the M3 in gear and drove off the lot expecting to find a huge amount of torque and although I know it's there I really didn't feel it. The BMW did have a huge burst of acceleration when you hit the gas so the turbo motor definitely made itself felt. Advantage M3. The steering in the M3 is inferior to the 991 and to my surprise there was substantial road noise. The M3 lacks a 7th gear so at 80mph I found myself turning over 3k RPM and it was loud. Advantage 991. The user interface on the 991 is worlds better than the BMW. You can't even get sat radion on the BMW unless it's part of a nonsense 4k option package. All in all the M3 is a good car for the money but I was happy to get back into the 991.
 
Old Dec 1, 2014 | 01:33 PM
  #2  
ChuckJ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,806
From: Dallas
Rep Power: 176
ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !


ChuckJ
 
Old Dec 1, 2014 | 02:03 PM
  #3  
genpop3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 20
genpop3 is just really nicegenpop3 is just really nicegenpop3 is just really nicegenpop3 is just really nicegenpop3 is just really nice
Originally Posted by tromero
So since I have long been complaining about the 991 I have had a luke warm relationship with for 3yrs I decided to go test drive a brand new manual tranny M3. My thoughts:


The M3 has a really nice interior with the exception of the cheap headliner. The seats I found to be more comfortable than my sport seats in the 991. The clutch on the M3 is feather light and I much prefer the 991. The transmission is a bit spongy on the M3 and I again prefer my 991. Where the BMW shines in the motor. I opened the hood and wow, it looks gorgeous complete with carbon fiber. It's a work of art. I put the M3 in gear and drove off the lot expecting to find a huge amount of torque and although I know it's there I really didn't feel it. The BMW did have a huge burst of acceleration when you hit the gas so the turbo motor definitely made itself felt. Advantage M3. The steering in the M3 is inferior to the 991 and to my surprise there was substantial road noise. The M3 lacks a 7th gear so at 80mph I found myself turning over 3k RPM and it was loud. Advantage 991. The user interface on the 991 is worlds better than the BMW. You can't even get sat radion on the BMW unless it's part of a nonsense 4k option package. All in all the M3 is a good car for the money but I was happy to get back into the 991.

I agree with you on many points but the iDrive system on the BMW is leaps and bounds ahead of the 991.

Google Maps send-to-car and touch sensitive memory keys are two examples.

I was house hunting in my wife's car and it was so nice to have all the destinations in the car as soon as we started it up.
 
Old Dec 1, 2014 | 02:44 PM
  #4  
ChuckJ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,806
From: Dallas
Rep Power: 176
ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by AoshichanX
I agree with you on many points but the iDrive system on the BMW is leaps and bounds ahead of the 991.

Google Maps send-to-car and touch sensitive memory keys are two examples.

I was house hunting in my wife's car and it was so nice to have all the destinations in the car as soon as we started it up.
Does this system interface with the internet so you can add apps like WAZE?

ChuckJ
 
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 07:00 AM
  #5  
beemer guy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 448
From: Raleigh, NC
Rep Power: 32
beemer guy is a jewel in the roughbeemer guy is a jewel in the roughbeemer guy is a jewel in the rough
BMW makes a great car, but it ain't no Porsche.
 
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 09:10 AM
  #6  
Leslierc's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 809
From: Los Angeles (Century City)
Rep Power: 48
Leslierc is a jewel in the roughLeslierc is a jewel in the roughLeslierc is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by beemer guy
BMW makes a great car, but it ain't no Porsche.
Having thoroughly enjoyed every single one of the 5 BMWs I've owned, I can concur with that statement!
 
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 09:41 AM
  #7  
Money2536's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 671
From: The Villages, FL
Rep Power: 67
Money2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond reputeMoney2536 has a reputation beyond repute
Well put. If I had to choose, I'd pick a C2/4 over an F8X M3/4 everytime.
 
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 04:47 PM
  #8  
eg991's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 809
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 55
eg991 is a splendid one to beholdeg991 is a splendid one to beholdeg991 is a splendid one to beholdeg991 is a splendid one to beholdeg991 is a splendid one to beholdeg991 is a splendid one to beholdeg991 is a splendid one to beholdeg991 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by Money2536
Well put. If I had to choose, I'd pick a C2/4 over an F8X M3/4 everytime.
My only M3 benchmark was the E9X version, but I found my 2013 C2S to be a superior car in almost every way. I understand that the F8X model is the newer product, but I think Porsche just makes a better -- and significantly more expensive -- product.
 
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 04:57 PM
  #9  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by eg991
My only M3 benchmark was the E9X version, but I found my 2013 C2S to be a superior car in almost every way. I understand that the F8X model is the newer product, but I think Porsche just makes a better -- and significantly more expensive -- product.
I agree with this.

But the last part is the big equalizer. With different costs comes different advantages. The real factor here is value, not so much cost. Both are relatively expensive, but value depends on which criteria is important to the buyer. Both are great cars. No denying that.
 
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 05:00 PM
  #10  
911cv's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 555
From: NC
Rep Power: 48
911cv is a splendid one to behold911cv is a splendid one to behold911cv is a splendid one to behold911cv is a splendid one to behold911cv is a splendid one to behold911cv is a splendid one to behold911cv is a splendid one to behold911cv is a splendid one to behold
2 thoughts....

Considering the price point of each, I think it's more appropriate to compare the M6 to the 991.

If BMW put the M6 engine in the M4, I'd consider trading my 991 (upon test drive, of course).
 
Old Dec 2, 2014 | 07:08 PM
  #11  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 911cv
2 thoughts....

Considering the price point of each, I think it's more appropriate to compare the M6 to the 991.

If BMW put the M6 engine in the M4, I'd consider trading my 991 (upon test drive, of course).
Price points be damned!

Doesn't stop the $85k Z06 from being compared to a $150k Turbo.

But - I, too, would love to see this phantom M4 with the M6 engine. That would be a BEAST! It is also a play right out of my own playbook - they already make the chassis, and the engine, just 'slip' it right in the assembly line, and watch the magic happen.

*edit: But admittedly, I've preached this about putting a couple of turbos on the 350Z (they already make the block, and the turbos, just put them together, don't touch anything else - except for any added plumbing, etc...), and my favorite Porsche - the Cayman (they make a block of similar dimensions - put it in a chassis already made, watch the sparks fly - no added assembly, no new parts, no jobs lost or gained). I think the only company that really grasped this "every car should be great, and the engine isn't the only component that drives platforms" philosophy is Aston Martin. Another reason I'm hoping to see which direction they take with the new engines. Hell even the new ATS-V is getting a V6TT with 450HP. GM gets it.
 

Last edited by jaspergtr; Dec 2, 2014 at 07:32 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2014 | 08:52 AM
  #12  
Compukidd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 366
From: New Jersey
Rep Power: 27
Compukidd is infamous around these parts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by beemer guy
BMW makes a great car, but it ain't no Porsche.
2nd that!
 
Old Dec 3, 2014 | 11:26 AM
  #13  
vividracing's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,404
From: Gilbert, AZ
Rep Power: 0
vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
Price points be damned!

Doesn't stop the $85k Z06 from being compared to a $150k Turbo.

But - I, too, would love to see this phantom M4 with the M6 engine. That would be a BEAST! It is also a play right out of my own playbook - they already make the chassis, and the engine, just 'slip' it right in the assembly line, and watch the magic happen.
I think the weight and the 50/50 will be ruined with the M6 engine.
 
Old Dec 3, 2014 | 11:50 AM
  #14  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by vividracing
I think the weight and the 50/50 will be ruined with the M6 engine.
I'm also sure that with about 15 minutes of engineering, they'd figure out a way to adjust a 425lbs (m3/4) engine, with a new ~550lbs (n63+ turbo plumbing) engine to account for the massive HP increase and make it not unbearable.

~125 additional pounds? It isn't all on the front axle either. I'd bet that there would a significant increase in performance if this were to happen.
 
Old Dec 3, 2014 | 11:53 AM
  #15  
vividracing's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,404
From: Gilbert, AZ
Rep Power: 0
vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
I'm also sure that with about 15 minutes of engineering, they'd figure out a way to adjust a 425lbs (m3/4) engine, with a new ~550lbs (n63+ turbo plumbing) engine to account for the massive HP increase and make it not unbearable.

~125 additional pounds? It isn't all on the front axle either. I'd bet that there would a significant increase in performance if this were to happen.
BMW doesn't do anything in 15 minutes
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 PM.