996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

HP & TQ to weight savings ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 11-22-2007, 01:15 AM
robertp's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,272
Rep Power: 159
robertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud of
Do the AWD 996 help an unbalanced PMI when turning?
 
  #17  
Old 11-22-2007, 06:03 AM
WOODTSTER's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MPLS, MN USA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
Rep Power: 464
WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !
Good discussion!

Bleu, thanks for the intelligent input. How about a carbon fibre hood?
I believe you can save about 30lbs???? How does this fit into the scheme
of things for track events?

MK
 
  #18  
Old 11-22-2007, 10:56 AM
Bleu Omdurman's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,066
Rep Power: 79
Bleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by robertp
Do the AWD 996 help an unbalanced PMI when turning?
Well, there is a couple of questions buried here. First, does AWD hurt the PMI? Second does AWD help or hurt turning?

First, the AWD stuff is heavy, low and forward of the Cg. That increases the PMI which makes the car harder to rotate and hard to stop rotating once it starts. It is low which helps lower the cg which translates into good grip characteristics for chassis dynamics.

Second, AWD (all else being equal) locks the wheels to the engine just like the rear wheels. At 100% grip (e.g. a long sweeper turn on the track) the 2WD car has the front wheels devoting all grip to turning. The AWD car, if you accellerate at 20% grip for acceleration, can only give 80% to turning. Try to accelerate like the GT3 and you will create an understeer condition. Therefore, in laymans terms, the AWD car will tend to understeer more than a RWD car, all else being equal.
 
  #19  
Old 11-22-2007, 11:34 AM
Bleu Omdurman's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,066
Rep Power: 79
Bleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond reputeBleu Omdurman has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
Good discussion!

Bleu, thanks for the intelligent input. How about a carbon fibre hood?
I believe you can save about 30lbs???? How does this fit into the scheme
of things for track events?

MK
There are three parts to this one. BLUF: its a good thing but not the absolute best place to lose weight for the track.

First, overall weight loss. The overall wieght loss reduces the denominator in the calculation of how many G's your car can make in a turn. Not significantly (i.e. a small cross wind would easily offset this small of a gain) but it does exist. When you add this up over the entire lap you should see a small improvment in lap times, all else being equal.

Second, it does reduce PMI. Which would tend to make the car slightly more responsive in turn in and to a lesser degree in Mid-turn.

Third, it removes weight from the front tires which we have already noted (though we perhaps haven't directly stated) are already lacking grip in mid turn and tend toward understeer. This wieght loss above the front axle, expands this tendency which would tend to raise lap times.

A very small fourth part, is that you are also lowering your Cg. This improves, as we stated above, you chassis dynamics in that less weight will shift under load.

Overall, changing the hood (as long as it doesn't change the areodynamics at all!) should improve lap times but only very small amount. IMO
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ModBargains
Bentley Vendor Classifieds
1
10-13-2015 03:42 PM
ModBargains
Lotus Vendor Classifieds
1
10-13-2015 03:42 PM
ModBargains
McLaren Vendor Classifieds
1
10-13-2015 03:41 PM
ModBargains
Other British Vendor Classifieds
1
10-13-2015 03:40 PM
AM v12v
Aston Martin
4
09-04-2015 02:52 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: HP & TQ to weight savings ratio



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:49 AM.