996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

2nd inline pump...running rich, weak return flow

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2013 | 05:59 PM
  #1  
FlyingGuy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 528
From: Bakersfield, CA
Rep Power: 52
FlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant future
2nd inline pump...running rich, weak return flow

Still chasing fueling stuff... we are modding a previously modded system and are having headaches. Todd says its something hardware, now we are just trying to find out WHAT!?

so a blown turbo leads to bigger turbos, needing more fueling. So we add an inline pump from Proto, 80#, and back to stock bored out FPR. The car has aftermarket fuel lines and filter (pictured). Since we dont have the stock filter, we cannot check fuel pressure as you would a stock setup. This used to be part of the old evoms GT700 fueling setup.

initial A3076 logs showed car running pig rich everywhere. 70+ psi checked from plummed in tee after 2nd pump(higher psi than todd wants or tuned for)

Anyway... we opened up the fuel reservoir and cycled the pumps via durametric. It seems that the RETURN is giving us minimal, sputtering flow. Not what I would call a stream tho. We are on our 2nd FPR, just in case it was that. All injectors are new. 2nd fuel pump is new. lines, stock pump, and fuel filter are as they have been.

What could be our return issue, that is causing high pressures back in the system, and resulting in sputtering return flow?
Could fuel filter (pictured) be the issue somehow? the in-tank pump maybe? I am about ready to scrap the damn thing. Serious.









 
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	img0840iq.jpg
Views:	455
Size:	114.1 KB
ID:	295109   Click image for larger version

Name:	img0841su.jpg
Views:	458
Size:	161.2 KB
ID:	295110   Click image for larger version

Name:	img0844er.jpg
Views:	444
Size:	163.4 KB
ID:	295111  
Old Oct 31, 2013 | 01:21 PM
  #2  
LQQK's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 456
Rep Power: 71
LQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond repute
I am very doubtful that the filter is causing your issue - as that is before the injectors and could only decrease fuel pressure not increase.


Its not clear in your pictures where you put the second pump, however, the manual has specifics on how to test the fuel pump for pressure and flow. For flow, with the engine off, and fuel pump on test the flow in the return line should fill a half gallon container pretty quickly (the manual says how quick).


I would then start to check your return line. Does your car use the original fuel cooler. You can disconnect their and test. This cuts out the line back to the tank. If it is flowing there you know its after that.
 
Old Oct 31, 2013 | 04:10 PM
  #3  
Ms4cd's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 432
From: San Francisco
Rep Power: 65
Ms4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond reputeMs4cd has a reputation beyond repute
On my setup, when we had the OEM cooler still hooked up, the fuel pressure would sky rocket. Eliminating the cooler did the trick.

On the other hand I have seen Todd use the OEM cooler properly by splitting the return line after the fpr. Essentially having two return lines (OEM and your own).
 
Old Oct 31, 2013 | 05:09 PM
  #4  
FlyingGuy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 528
From: Bakersfield, CA
Rep Power: 52
FlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by LQQK
I would then start to check your return line. Does your car use the original fuel cooler. You can disconnect their and test. This cuts out the line back to the tank. If it is flowing there you know its after that.
I am pretty sure it is the stock fuel cooler. Looks like it anyway. That's a good heads up. Thanks

The pump is an under-car setup. We will check to see how much flow it should put out.
 
Old Oct 31, 2013 | 05:20 PM
  #5  
joetwint's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,566
From: new york
Rep Power: 604
joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !
no disrespect as i know you didnt set it up but that setup looks like garbage.The union,the way it is ran the clamps at the swell pot all looks hastily done which is why your probably having problems.
 
Old Oct 31, 2013 | 07:29 PM
  #6  
Swole Powell's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 635
From: Houston
Rep Power: 111
Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !
That setup looks extremely dangerous!
 
Old Oct 31, 2013 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
FlyingGuy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 528
From: Bakersfield, CA
Rep Power: 52
FlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant future
My understanding is this originally had the Evoms gt700 fueling.
What need to be done to rectify this? And what makes it "dangerous"?!

If this could be the cause if my issue, I need to fix it... NOW!
 
Old Nov 1, 2013 | 12:28 AM
  #8  
Powell's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,475
From: Friendswood, TX
Rep Power: 385
Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !
In my opinion what does make it dangerous is the transition on the return line has a union for no obvious reason other than the fact the original line was cut to short. This could possibly be from the initial fuel system install. This being a fitting that does not need to be there and could start leaking in the future. If it worked before than that's fine. Though I've never seen a EVOMS setup on the 700 car that was done by Sharkworks/EVOMS/Imagine Auto/etc. that was setup like that.

What FPR did you have in before the 80# injectors/2nd pump? Factory or a 5bar?
 
Old Nov 1, 2013 | 06:30 AM
  #9  
joetwint's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,566
From: new york
Rep Power: 604
joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !
that is not an Evoms fuel system of any kind......this i am sure of.
 
Old Nov 1, 2013 | 08:08 AM
  #10  
Mark @ AIM Performance's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,584
From: S.Plainfield, NJ
Rep Power: 856
Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !
if car is rnning very rich check for njectors stuck open. get rid of your fuel cooler , its very restrictive. i would not worry about union fittings, not the cleanest way but if you assembled them correctly they should not leak. i do not like all the 90s you are using for no reason, not good for flow. you can make this setup way cleaner by routing the lines over the back of the tank and into the driveshaft tunnel if you are RWD, you can also put the filter down there too.
 
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
Old Nov 1, 2013 | 03:44 PM
  #11  
Swole Powell's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 635
From: Houston
Rep Power: 111
Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !
I am not a fan of the hose clamps on top of the tank, these lines were designed for an an-fittings. It can work but I would feel much safer with an an-bulkhead out of the top. I also would replace the filter cartridge for safe measure, but I am thinking the issue is your bored out FPR, I would replace it with a stock unit since you have aftermarket injectors.
 
Old Nov 1, 2013 | 05:50 PM
  #12  
FlyingGuy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 528
From: Bakersfield, CA
Rep Power: 52
FlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant futureFlyingGuy has a brilliant future
Before this setup, I had stock FPR with 60# injectors.

We ran this setup on that FPR. Then, purchased a new OEM fpr. THEN, bored out that FPR per Todd's suggestion. Same issue.

I know nothing about fuel lines or connections or unions... But If we have unnecessary bends, I don't like that.
Also, how can we "eliminate" the fuel cooler completely? What doe we clamp or remove? Is it a straight forward removal? I don't want to be spraying fuel or coolant all over the back of my car!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Evan5469
996 Turbo / GT2
13
Oct 29, 2015 06:39 PM
cm09578
991 Turbo
17
Sep 22, 2015 06:07 AM
ModBargains
Mercedes/AMG Vendor Classifieds
0
Sep 10, 2015 12:00 PM
studlee
991
1
Sep 6, 2015 11:19 PM
m_motorsport
996 Turbo / GT2
0
Sep 2, 2015 12:53 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 PM.