996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Dyno - SRM K24's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-27-2019, 06:49 PM
Sourcerock's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: YYC
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 22
Sourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to behold
Dyno - SRM K24's

I posted a thread back in Sep 2016 with the following chart (stock K16's, 3" catless, UMW tune, 91 octane, RWD).







Since then (2018) installed SRM K24's, Injectors, GT2RS I/C's, Marski mafless tune, filters on turbo's. The mafless tune has run flawless for a year.

Finally got around to getting it Dyno'd this week.

Same: shop, dyno, operator, 91 pump gas & RWD. Here are the results :



More on the red run vs. green run later.


I asked the operator for a overlay from my baseline . . . still waiting . . . quicker to draw it on the new graph.




Green run was with Super 10 mufflers on the UW 3" catless.

I removed the mufflers for the red run and slipped on the original end pipes (resulting in the standard UW 3" SS catless).

I was surprised the Super 10's back pressure helped a little up to 4250 rpm and only cost 10-15 hp above 5250 rpm.

The super 10's quiet down the car noticeably, huge difference at cold start-up.

Ignore the electric cut-outs, the cold start-up is very reasonable, so I removed them.




 
  #2  
Old 06-28-2019, 10:20 AM
Sveina's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sweden
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 0
Sveina is on a distinguished road
At what boost levels are the different runs?
 
  #3  
Old 06-28-2019, 01:16 PM
Sourcerock's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: YYC
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 22
Sourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to behold
All runs are at 1.2 bar.
 
  #4  
Old 06-29-2019, 09:22 AM
brnrdtns's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boise, Idaho
Age: 40
Posts: 1,715
Rep Power: 147
brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !
Those are solid numbers for 91 octane.
 
  #5  
Old 08-14-2019, 09:07 AM
TheDeckMan's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: W.Mass
Age: 39
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
TheDeckMan will become famous soon enough
That is a nice hike in power!
 
  #6  
Old 08-14-2019, 02:11 PM
Sourcerock's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: YYC
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 22
Sourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to behold
Anyone have any thoughts about how safe my stock rods are with this set-up ?
 
  #7  
Old 08-15-2019, 12:34 PM
JSBear's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Laguna Hills, CA
Posts: 868
Rep Power: 71
JSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond reputeJSBear has a reputation beyond repute
If the torque curve was shifted 5-600 rpm or more to the left, I would be more concerned. The SRM turbos seem to spool faster than my K24-18g's, I would prefer that power curve over what I have now.
 
  #8  
Old 08-15-2019, 11:29 PM
rennteche55's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 263
Rep Power: 24
rennteche55 is on a distinguished road
Seems like a lot of extra mods for only 30rwhp? Or is it the change to the curve that’s what matters more so than peak power?!
 
  #9  
Old 08-16-2019, 10:31 AM
brnrdtns's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boise, Idaho
Age: 40
Posts: 1,715
Rep Power: 147
brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by rennteche55
Seems like a lot of extra mods for only 30rwhp? Or is it the change to the curve that’s what matters more so than peak power?!
450 to 580 hp.
 
  #10  
Old 08-16-2019, 10:34 AM
Sourcerock's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: YYC
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 22
Sourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by rennteche55
Seems like a lot of extra mods for only 30rwhp? Or is it the change to the curve that’s what matters more so than peak power?!
HP went from 453 ((K16's) to 580 (SRM's)
TQ went from 550 (K16's) to 590 (SRM's)


Huge improvement. Hoping the rods are not over-stressed with the way the power comes on.
 
  #11  
Old 08-16-2019, 12:20 PM
brnrdtns's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boise, Idaho
Age: 40
Posts: 1,715
Rep Power: 147
brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Sourcerock
HP went from 453 ((K16's) to 580 (SRM's)
TQ went from 550 (K16's) to 590 (SRM's)


Huge improvement. Hoping the rods are not over-stressed with the way the power comes on.
Don't mash it at low rpm, like when trying to pass someone. Hard to do though because it is fun to feel that boost come on from low rpm.
 
  #12  
Old 08-16-2019, 03:20 PM
Sourcerock's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: YYC
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 22
Sourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by brnrdtns
Don't mash it at low rpm, like when trying to pass someone. Hard to do though because it is fun to feel that boost come on from low rpm.
The Torque curve has shifted 750 rpm to the right. It used to make 550 WTQ @ 3500 rpm -> it now it needs 4250 to make 550 WTQ.

At 4250 the bigger turbos are working, the SRM's make 100 WTQ from 4500 -7000 over the K16's

If I mash the gas at a low rpm, in a big gear, the turbos don't spool as hard as the K16's below 4250. You would think there would be less cylinder pressure with the SRM's below 4250 and therefore lower chance of bending rods.

What am I missing ?
 
  #13  
Old 08-16-2019, 04:10 PM
brnrdtns's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boise, Idaho
Age: 40
Posts: 1,715
Rep Power: 147
brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !brnrdtns Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Sourcerock
The Torque curve has shifted 750 rpm to the right. It used to make 550 WTQ @ 3500 rpm -> it now it needs 4250 to make 550 WTQ.

At 4250 the bigger turbos are working, the SRM's make 100 WTQ from 4500 -7000 over the K16's

If I mash the gas at a low rpm, in a big gear, the turbos don't spool as hard as the K16's below 4250. You would think there would be less cylinder pressure with the SRM's below 4250 and therefore lower chance of bending rods.

What am I missing ?
Could be true. You're probably in good shape. I'm just saying that is where you want to be a little more cautious.
 
  #14  
Old 08-16-2019, 08:43 PM
rennteche55's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 263
Rep Power: 24
rennteche55 is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Sourcerock
HP went from 453 ((K16's) to 580 (SRM's)
TQ went from 550 (K16's) to 590 (SRM's)


Huge improvement. Hoping the rods are not over-stressed with the way the power comes on.

Ahh my bad , couldn’t zoom in far enough on my phone screen. Can post up some pics of what air filter setup you’re running? I know it’s maff less just wonder what you went with.
 
  #15  
Old 08-17-2019, 10:29 AM
Sourcerock's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: YYC
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 22
Sourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to beholdSourcerock is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by JSBear
If the torque curve was shifted 5-600 rpm or more to the left, I would be more concerned. The SRM turbos seem to spool faster than my K24-18g's, I would prefer that power curve over what I have now.
Do you have filters on your turbos or the stock intake system?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Dyno - SRM K24's



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 AM.