996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

K24's Or K16/24's Hybrids Pro's & Con's Which Are Better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 07-25-2006, 03:48 PM
sharkster's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 49
Posts: 23,889
Rep Power: 1515
sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Craig
Ryan, I'm sorry to nit pick, but you spelled "his" incorrectly.

Craig
That's why I always carry one of these with me everywhere I go/type
 
Attached Images  
  #32  
Old 07-25-2006, 04:40 PM
iLLM3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SOFLA/NYC
Posts: 16,297
Rep Power: 715
iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by sharkster
That's why I always carry one of these with me everywhere I go/type
 
  #33  
Old 07-25-2006, 05:11 PM
alevine's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,032
Rep Power: 62
alevine has a spectacular aura aboutalevine has a spectacular aura about
Holy crap, you guys are cruel!
 
  #34  
Old 12-29-2006, 01:12 AM
DEANWYSOCKI's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Avon, CT
Age: 48
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 0
DEANWYSOCKI is an unknown quantity at this point
nice question, anyone who experienced these got an answer

[quote=ebaker]All things being equal, for instance a stage 2 car with aftermarket muffler and ECU, stock intake and stock headers, what would be the power difference (93 octane) between K16's VS k16/24's VS Kevin's stage 2 K16/26's?

=-=

i am looking to do kevins hybrid k16/24's non-zero clr

my goal is to get 600hp at crank... I was told they spool faster then my stock k16s on giac and better for my goal then garrett's gt640

looking forward to see what happens with them.. oh yea, i will consider buying a pre-owned set of kevins 16/24's if anyones selling em : ?

dw
 
  #35  
Old 12-29-2006, 01:59 AM
ze_shark's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SF Bay Area / Switzerland
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 34
ze_shark is just really niceze_shark is just really niceze_shark is just really niceze_shark is just really niceze_shark is just really nice
Could use a word or two of clarification.
I am shopping for a 996TT, and have two cars in sight, an '02 and an '04 X50. Considering that I would only very mildly tune the car (GIAC flash, PSS9), am I better off with the standard TT's K16 or with the X50's K24 ?
Is the lag difference noticeable in real world terms ?
Is an X50 worth any premium ?
 
  #36  
Old 12-29-2006, 02:18 AM
Ray's Avatar
Ray
Ray is offline
Former Vendor
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 4,115
Rep Power: 0
Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !Ray Is a GOD !
Here is a video I've took last summer. The camera car "Black TT" is K24 GIAC, V-flow, Mine "Yellow TT" is K16, GIAC, V-Flow, Ruf exhaust. You can clearly see the turbo lag between K24 and K16

http://tunertrader.vidiac.com/catego...120018f997.htm
 
  #37  
Old 12-29-2006, 08:11 AM
cpu77's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: On the East Coast
Age: 50
Posts: 685
Rep Power: 45
cpu77 is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
I had the k16/26 ( stage5s)... it was pulling crazy even at low rpms...
I know that k16/24s duno around 570 hp(crank)- plus 25 hp or so) and the stage 5s ZC dunoed at 580 rwhp with ICs, 76 mm TB, intake, 5 bar FPR.
Was the lag any worse on the k16/26 over the k16/24's. I have wondered this for a while?
 
  #38  
Old 12-29-2006, 09:05 AM
Indykid's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hot town
Posts: 591
Rep Power: 43
Indykid is a jewel in the roughIndykid is a jewel in the roughIndykid is a jewel in the rough
I had this dilemia as well. I decided to go with the k16/24.
 
  #39  
Old 12-29-2006, 09:25 AM
JWC's Avatar
JWC
JWC is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Powhatan, VA
Posts: 520
Rep Power: 38
JWC will become famous soon enough
Just to add another option. I went with the Protomotive 24/18G hybrid turbos on my 02 X50 car. With the other mods from Protomotive my car rolls. As far as lag: the stock 2001 TT with the 16's I test drove had less lag than the 02 X50 car I purchased. It also had less power. I knew keeping the car stock was not going to be an option for me. So I started with a little more lag, more stock power (X50), and a better starting point for the mods. My hybrid turbos with exchange and new WG's pre set was $1,400.00. Now I have less lag than the stock X50 and a lot more power. I drove the car with the ECU, 5 bar reg, Fabspeed, BMC filter, and new BOV's for a few days then had the Hybrid Protomotive 24/18G's installed. The 24/18's ROCK! I can tell you from my experience If you start with more you will end up with more for less money. ZE shark get the X50. Test drive both but in the "real" world the lag difference is not much and in a short sprint you would still pull past a stock K16 car. Oh..... and like my friend Markski, I didn't realize helping fellow members was an english test.
 
  #40  
Old 12-29-2006, 09:54 AM
kiko's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Porto/Portugal
Age: 46
Posts: 429
Rep Power: 36
kiko will become famous soon enough
For me, worse than turbo lag is the turbo threshold, they're obviously related but many confuse these two aspects.
 
  #41  
Old 12-29-2006, 10:01 AM
oak's Avatar
oak
oak is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,742
Rep Power: 140
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
you can get a smoothed over k24/26 with vitually no difference in lag in comparison to the k16/24's and have gobs of torque through the mid and top end. I tried all three and hands down the k24/26 have much more to offer.
 
  #42  
Old 12-29-2006, 10:31 AM
WOODTSTER's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MPLS, MN USA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
Rep Power: 464
WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !
+1

I think the "fear of lag" is overated, and I do believe that large turbos
combined with the correct programming will work beautifully!!
(i.e., you can have different lag characteristics using the same turbos on a
car by changing a group of elements within a program). This is one of the things Todd K (Protomotive) will ask a customer; where do you want your power ???

You need these (K24/K26)...
 
  #43  
Old 12-29-2006, 11:06 AM
rwm514's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,085
Rep Power: 63
rwm514 will become famous soon enoughrwm514 will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by oak
you can get a smoothed over k24/26 with vitually no difference in lag in comparison to the k16/24's and have gobs of torque through the mid and top end. I tried all three and hands down the k24/26 have much more to offer.
Oak, can you give some more details about the k24/26 turbos? Such as whp and torque figures, do you happen to have a dyno? thx
 
  #44  
Old 12-29-2006, 12:40 PM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHICAGO
Age: 55
Posts: 9,720
Rep Power: 601
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
I have said this before and Ill say it again... how come no one complains about GT2s being laggy... and yet it comes with k24s...
You guys don't get one thing... smaller turbos spool up quick but have a short power band via the rpm range... whats the use of having a turbo that has 1700 rpms of power?
I want a turbo that will pull from 3rd gear on forward..... so who cares about an extra 500 rpms of lag? Im already in the power band by then anyways..
markski
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




  #45  
Old 12-29-2006, 03:47 PM
ze_shark's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SF Bay Area / Switzerland
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 34
ze_shark is just really niceze_shark is just really niceze_shark is just really niceze_shark is just really niceze_shark is just really nice
Can someone kindly point me to references on K16/24, K24/26, 24/18 and other models ? I am not too sure I understand this hybrid turbo thing.
Perhaps no one complains about GT2s having more lag because customers have different expectations and usage patterns ?
Is an X50 really a better base for light tuning ?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: K24's Or K16/24's Hybrids Pro's & Con's Which Are Better



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 PM.