996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

6speedonline's official 60-130, 1/4 Mile, and Standing Mile list

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old May 3, 2009 | 04:13 PM
  #1786  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by art4iza
I assume you did not go with HSF if it's 100% Meth. Were you guys able to look at the dyno at that boost with and without Meth, just curious. Also interested to know the intake temp. variance. Great results!
I think I know where you're going with this.... the NEW hsf1 pump that started shipping ~1 month ago is rated for 100% meth!!
 
Old May 3, 2009 | 04:15 PM
  #1787  
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tony@epl
I think I know where you're going with this.... the NEW hsf1 pump that started shipping ~1 month ago is rated for 100% meth!!

...and that the one I have...pumps 165psi instead of 125psi, right.
 
Old May 3, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #1788  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by ttboost
...and that the one I have...pumps 165psi instead of 125psi, right.
Correct.
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #1789  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
We had a break in the rain so I took the Z06 out and got some 60-130 runs in.

I ran a 5.86 on a slight incline in 87% humidity with 93 octane. That's exactly 2 seconds faster than my best stock time of 7.86...which was done on a perfect dry, cool day.

I noticed that with this setup and the stock gears, the car is definitely not optimized for 60-130 runs. The best run was made with 1-shift from 3rd to 4th, but the stock gearing is so tall that I'm still very low in the powerband in 3rd by the time I hit 60 mph. So....I'm going to get a 3.90 diff for the car. Based off what Jamie (ohiogt2) has told me it will significantly improve the car's acceleration (he has the 3.90 diff in his car).

Below is a graph of the 5.86 run, and well as an overlay comparison to my best stock run of 7.86 with 2-shifts.
 
Attached Images   

Last edited by Divexxtreme; May 6, 2009 at 08:42 PM.
Old May 6, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #1790  
Powell's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,475
From: Friendswood, TX
Rep Power: 385
Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
We had a break in the rain so I took the Z06 out and got some 60-130 runs in.

I ran a 5.86 on a slight incline in 87% humidity with 93 octane. That's exactly 2 seconds faster than my best stock time of 7.86...which was done on a perfect dry, cool day.

I noticed that with this setup and the stock gears, the car is definitely not optimized for 60-130 runs. The best run was made with 1-shift from 3rd to 4th, but the stock gearing is so tall that I'm still very low in the powerband in 3rd by the time I hit 60 mph. So....I'm going to get a 3.90 diff for the car. Based off what Jamie (ohiogt2) has told me it will significantly improve the car's acceleration (he has the 3.90 diff in his car).

Below is a graph of the 5.86 run, and well as an overlay comparison to my best stock run of 7.86 with 2-shifts.
Now you see the downfall Matt (Lil Powell) has with the Vette on a 26" tire That is why his 5.2 pass has 2 shifts. With a 28" tire you SHOULD be able to do a 60-130 using just 2nd and 3rd. That's what we figure should work on his Vette.

Regardless that's def. a HUGE improvement over stock. Glad to see you are back in the states and that you stayed safe! Have fun with it bro!
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 08:54 PM
  #1791  
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Congrats Scott. Thats a great start. It seems the gearing on the Corvette doesn't lend itself to the 60-130. But 3.90's should fix that. GL
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #1792  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Powell
Now you see the downfall Matt (Lil Powell) has with the Vette on a 26" tire That is why his 5.2 pass has 2 shifts. With a 28" tire you SHOULD be able to do a 60-130 using just 2nd and 3rd. That's what we figure should work on his Vette.

Regardless that's def. a HUGE improvement over stock. Glad to see you are back in the states and that you stayed safe! Have fun with it bro!
Thanks, bro. This 1-shift stuff is new to me, as I always got better times in my P-car with 2-shifts.

That said; my 345/35/18 Mickeys are actually 27.5" tall. The M&Hs in the same size are 28" tall. But...I think 3rd to 4th will be the best gears to use after I go to a 3.90 rear. I'm ordering it first thing tomorrow.

The car has a lot left in it, and I don't believe the current 60-130 times are an accurate indication of it's abilities.

Also, I have to go back and look at all of my graphs, but I think my best stock time with humidity close to as high as it is tonight was around 8.4...so it's a definite improvement.

Thanks again.
 

Last edited by Divexxtreme; May 6, 2009 at 09:00 PM.
Old May 6, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #1793  
TXGold's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,817
From: Houston, TX
Rep Power: 238
TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !TXGold Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
We had a break in the rain so I took the Z06 out and got some 60-130 runs in.

I ran a 5.86 on a slight incline in 87% humidity with 93 octane. That's exactly 2 seconds faster than my best stock time of 7.86...which was done on a perfect dry, cool day.

I noticed that with this setup and the stock gears, the car is definitely not optimized for 60-130 runs. The best run was made with 1-shift from 3rd to 4th, but the stock gearing is so tall that I'm still very low in the powerband in 3rd by the time I hit 60 mph. So....I'm going to get a 3.90 diff for the car. Based off what Jamie (ohiogt2) has told me it will significantly improve the car's acceleration (he has the 3.90 diff in his car).

Below is a graph of the 5.86 run, and well as an overlay comparison to my best stock run of 7.86 with 2-shifts.
Hope you're loving it! Welcome home, skipper.

Ryan
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 09:59 PM
  #1794  
germeezy1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,571
From: Kirkland
Rep Power: 179
germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !
Because of the Z06's really tall gearing the 1/4 mile typically shows alot more of its performance envelope. I bet your car traps mid to high 130's as it sits right now.

Are you shifting at the factory redline or did you raise the rev limiter?
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #1795  
germeezy1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,571
From: Kirkland
Rep Power: 179
germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !
Ok maybe in the 140's with the DR's?
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 10:01 PM
  #1796  
AtomicZ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,015
From: MN
Rep Power: 277
AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
We had a break in the rain so I took the Z06 out and got some 60-130 runs in.

I ran a 5.86 on a slight incline in 87% humidity with 93 octane. That's exactly 2 seconds faster than my best stock time of 7.86...which was done on a perfect dry, cool day.

I noticed that with this setup and the stock gears, the car is definitely not optimized for 60-130 runs. The best run was made with 1-shift from 3rd to 4th, but the stock gearing is so tall that I'm still very low in the powerband in 3rd by the time I hit 60 mph. So....I'm going to get a 3.90 diff for the car. Based off what Jamie (ohiogt2) has told me it will significantly improve the car's acceleration (he has the 3.90 diff in his car).

Below is a graph of the 5.86 run, and well as an overlay comparison to my best stock run of 7.86 with 2-shifts.
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Guys,

Mike (TTboost) ran a very quick 6.24 with 1-shift on a 2.28% decline in his AWD car on pump gas with meth injection.

He also ran a very solid 11.54 @ 129.4 1/4 mile with a 2.02 short time.

Great job, Mike!!
Scott -

Z06 gears do not seem to be optimal for 60-130 times. Compare the 1/4 mile and 60-130 time of TTboost to my 60-130 of 6.9 with a 1/4 mile time of 10.72 @ 134.56.

I would have to agree that 2 shifts seem to be the fastest even with all the torque the engine produces down low.

Have you looked into the difference between a 3:90 & a 4:10 diff?

Still very good times and good to have you back in the states.
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 10:16 PM
  #1797  
art4iza's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,190
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 276
art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !
Great start Scott. I think the car has more power left in it also. GL
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #1798  
Swole Powell's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 635
From: Houston
Rep Power: 111
Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !Swole Powell Is a GOD !
Scott very nice times glad your getting traction, these cars dont like the road like the P cars. 60-130 is a good measurement but doesnt always show every cars true potential. Like Atomic was saying his car traps better then some porsche running faster 60-130 time, and I know my car will trap easy 15X mph but I cant get a 60-130 time because the car isnt set up for it. Trap speed is the true number to judging hp.
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 10:35 PM
  #1799  
AtomicZ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,015
From: MN
Rep Power: 277
AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !AtomicZ Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Based off what Jamie (ohiogt2) has told me it will significantly improve the car's acceleration (he has the 3.90 diff in his car).

.
Jamie -

Thanks for showing me your tail-lights in Houston. Did you look into getting 4:10's instead of 3:90's? If so, what was the difference maker?
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 10:38 PM
  #1800  
germeezy1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,571
From: Kirkland
Rep Power: 179
germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Lil Powell
Scott very nice times glad your getting traction, these cars dont like the road like the P cars. 60-130 is a good measurement but doesnt always show every cars true potential. Like Atomic was saying his car traps better then some porsche running faster 60-130 time, and I know my car will trap easy 15X mph but I cant get a 60-130 time because the car isnt set up for it. Trap speed is the true number to judging hp.

I think trapping 150 puts you in the big boy club regardless of what your car runs 60-130!
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 AM.