Wow, that's effin fast for a bone stock car. Awesome Scott!
Got a barrell of C16 sittin right here... mmmmmmm, P-cars looooove lead! :D |
Scott, WOW, that is NUTS, congrats!
I just grabbed my box and put it in my daily IS-F with 500 miles on it and busted a 13.29 60-130. Not bad for a new car and a first try in hot/humid weather. :) If we have any more cool weather I think she might have a 12.99 in her but we won't see cool for a LONGGGGG time. The MOST impressive thing about the IS-F is the shifting...there is NO perceived shift even though I was paddle shifting teh car... http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a35...S-F60to130.jpg Peter |
Originally Posted by houstonT
(Post 1793558)
Scott, WOW, that is NUTS, congrats!
I just grabbed my box and put it in my daily IS-F with 500 miles on it and busted a 13.29 60-130. Not bad for a new car and a first try in hot/humid weather. :) If we have any more cool weather I think she might have a 12.99 in her but we won't see cool for a LONGGGGG time. The MOST impressive thing about the IS-F is the shifting...there is NO perceived shift even though I was paddle shifting teh car... Peter |
They say the IS-F transmission in paddle mode shifts in 0.1 seconds...which makes it the fastest shifting tranny on the market (even faster than an F430, Enzo, 599, etc...) Based on the graph and the way it feels, i believe it...
Peter
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
(Post 1793673)
Very nice, Peter! That car has 12's in her for sure on a better day. That thing shifts like an automatic?! That's very impressive...
|
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
(Post 673327)
That said; because the AX-22 does not show height, elevation or slope angle...starting on 01 March '08, AX-22 data will no longer be allowed for submission. |
1 Attachment(s)
Scott's Z06 runs inspired me to go out and rerun my SL65 Renntech today in the 60-130mph. I turned off traction control this time and let the computer do all the shifting. I also had half a tank less gas this time and the temp was a little cooler. Anyways, as you can see on the attached graph I pulled a 7.78 seconds. Not bad for a 4500+ pound Mercedes.
Aaron |
Oh, it's on now, bro! I'm after that 7.7 time of your SL as soon we get some better atmospheric pressure! LOL...great run. I'll verify it later on....:)
|
I just ran a 4.40 60-130 . Just kidding.hilarious
|
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
(Post 1795536)
Oh, it's on now, bro! I'm after that 7.7 time of your SL as soon we get some better atmospheric pressure! LOL...great run. I'll verify it later on....:)
|
Aaron,
It's verified at 7.78. Nice job. I'll be gunning for that time before I install any mods, bro.:) |
Thanks, good luck with your Z06 runs. I owned a 2007 Z06 for 4 months, and it was a great car.
|
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
(Post 673327)
*NOTE: The maximum allowed downhill slope % over the course of the run is 3.0%. Any run that exceeds 3.0% will not be posted on the list.
That said; because the AX-22 does not show height, elevation or slope angle...starting on 01 March '08, AX-22 data will no longer be allowed for submission. BTW just as an FYI, not for the ranking, here is a picture of a 6.5s run with two normal (Gs going below zero) shifts that shows altitude..and power output as calculated by the tool. This has a 4ft drop in elevation. http://forums.rennlist.com/upload/65s_60130js.jpg |
Originally Posted by Jean
(Post 1796360)
Scott out of curiosity, how do you calculate the 3% elevation change?
BTW just as an FYI, not for the ranking, here is a picture of a 6.5s run with two normal (Gs going below zero) shifts that shows altitude..and power output as calculated by the tool. This has a 4ft drop in elevation. The P-box shows not only the slope angles, but also the start height, end height, and total difference in height (positive or negative) over the entire distance of the run. I simply divide the distance into the height for the percentage. If it exceeds a total downward slope angle of 3.0%, I won't allow the run to be on the list. IRT the AX-22 showing elevation/height...this is news to me. Non of the graphs you guys ever post on Rennlist ever show height/elevation (so for all we know, many of those runs might have occurred on 10% declines)....and TB993TT even stated in a thread that the AX-22 did not not measure slope or elevation (discussion begins at post #159 http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforum...+12DegC&page=5 ). Regardless, I'm simply not 100% comfortable with the accuracy of the AX-22. But I am with the D and/or P-box. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by acicchelli
(Post 1795571)
Haha, thanks Scott. I am at around 650 elevation and my barometric pressure was 29.71 today and humidity 50%. Temp was about 50 degrees. I am not sure how all that effects my runs though as I am no weather expert.
I just ran a 7.86 in the Z06 with 2-shifts on a 0.2% decline. I also have a in-car video that I'll post later.:) IRT the weather, the barometric pressure is extremely important when it come to N/A cars (even more than humidity). Since FI cars essentially create their own pressure environment, barometric pressure doesn't have as much of an affect on them...but there is still an effect. Today I had 30.06 inches of pressure, which gave the Z06 a little bit more power...as seen by my new time. |
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
(Post 1797047)
Aaron,
I just ran a 7.86 in the Z06 with 2-shifts on a 0.2% decline. I also have a in-car video that I'll post later.:) IRT the weather, the atmospheric presure is extremely important when it come to N/A cars (moreso than humidity). Since FI cars essentially create their own pressure environment, barometric pressure doesn't have as much of an affect on them (but there is still an effect). Today I had 30.06 inches of pressure, which gave the Z06 a little bit more power...as seen by my new time. Aaron |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands