6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource

6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/)
-   996 Turbo / GT2 (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/996-turbo-gt2-2/)
-   -   6speedonline's official 60-130, 1/4 Mile, and Standing Mile list (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/996-turbo-gt2/55163-6speedonlines-official-60-130-1-4-mile-standing-mile-list.html)

joetwint Apr 22, 2008 09:04 PM

Congrats Ryan! Nice runs.:cool:

Powell Apr 22, 2008 09:09 PM

Just like I said on the phone earlier.. Those times are insane!

Lets get that beast to the track and see if we can set a K16 record ;)

KPG Apr 22, 2008 09:19 PM


Originally Posted by Powell (Post 1810869)
Just like I said on the phone earlier.. Those times are insane!

Lets get that beast to the track and see if we can set a K16 record ;)

There was a 1/4 mile trap speed in that file....:cool:

Jean Apr 22, 2008 10:05 PM

Yes those graphs look much better. Have to be blind not to see what looked like a second shift on the previous ones due to the cr@ppy long G lines. Divexxtreme also thought the same.

Maybe this makes the Einsteins out there feel better? :cool:

heavychevy Apr 22, 2008 10:35 PM


thanks for looking that up.


who's the naysayer, speak up.

heavychevy Apr 22, 2008 11:06 PM

The more I read about the LSD, the less I like it. Added understeer? WTH!?!?! Makes it even more pointless on an AWD car. Now you have both power understeer and forced understeer to dial out. May work for some, but if you arent pulling your hair out or have tons of front downforce, you've modded beyond your driving capability.

And if I go RWD then I essentially add back the understeer I was trying to get rid of. Or am I reading to much into it? This is terrible. Screw it, I'm going to go about 3.5 degrees negative camber in the front and see how that does.

TXGold Apr 22, 2008 11:09 PM

KPG I am flattered and thank you. Thanks Joe and Chris.

Jean, how could you think there was a shift involved when there is a positive increase in G's. The little I know about this stuff leads me to believe that a positive G would not be present because of a shift. BTW, why don't you go get some 60-130 or 1/4 times for us to ridicule.

:hilarious:

Jean Apr 23, 2008 03:17 AM


Originally Posted by TXGold (Post 1811107)
Jean, how could you think there was a shift involved when there is a positive increase in G's.

Do you not see the negative -0.2 G?

Originally Posted by TXGold (Post 1811107)
BTW, why don't you go get some 60-130 or 1/4 times for us to ridicule.

:hilarious:

Why do you think you could ridicule them and why is it funny?

b29pb Apr 23, 2008 04:40 AM

wow.. 7 sec on stock z06 i never know it goes that fast..

Divexxtreme Apr 23, 2008 05:30 AM


Originally Posted by Jean (Post 1810977)
Yes those graphs look much better. Have to be blind not to see what looked like a second shift on the previous ones due to the cr@ppy long G lines. Divexxtreme also thought the same.

:confused:

Jean,

Just for clarification, I never once thought it was a second shift. As I told you via PM's, I assumed that due to the speed in which it ocurred and the unlikeliness that TXGold would lie...it was either caused by engine hesitation during acceleration, or another similar anomaly.

I never thought for a moment that there was any dishonesty on the part of TXGold about his runs, nor did I ever tell you anything of the like.

Divexxtreme Apr 23, 2008 05:33 AM


Originally Posted by KPG (Post 1810831)
Congrats Ryan, you must have "Real" Porsche HP.


Couldn't have said it better myself (those that follow Rennlist will understand). hilarious

Divexxtreme Apr 23, 2008 05:36 AM


Originally Posted by b29pb (Post 1811339)
wow.. 7 sec on stock z06 i never know it goes that fast..

I didn't either until I did it. The car is deceptively quick.

I'm going to try 100 octane in her to see if it makes any difference. I don't think it will do much in a bone stock car, but I'm going to try anyway.

Divexxtreme Apr 23, 2008 05:39 AM


Originally Posted by TXGold (Post 1811107)
KPG I am flattered and thank you. Thanks Joe and Chris.

Jean, how could you think there was a shift involved when there is a positive increase in G's. The little I know about this stuff leads me to believe that a positive G would not be present because of a shift. BTW, why don't you go get some 60-130 or 1/4 times for us to ridicule.

:hilarious:

I would like Jean to go out and get some 1/4 mile times with his car as well, but in all honesty...his 60-130 times are very quick.

b29pb Apr 23, 2008 05:41 AM

i dont think it will as well unless you do some settings.

b29pb Apr 23, 2008 05:42 AM

well good luck anyway, dont blow up the car. and be safe in the track !

cheers


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands