Guys, I decide to run without VTG's so I decide to sell my modified GT2 turbines.
Modification was made by KKK Borg Warner (development department) in Germany which I paid for 4760 Euro.
There is few things done on it, one of them is 2 mm bigger air wheel.
I run with this set 1,400 kilometers from Germany to Poland.
We measured 640 German PS on the maha dyno.
I paid for the turbines 8568 euro and 4760 for modifications which is together 13,328 euro.
I would like to have 8700euro for both.

 

What would be the difference between the turbos in my EVOMS 700 TT car and those re-worked GT2 TT's ? Quicker spool ? More HP ?

 

Off-topic and sorry to hijack, but goddamn is the car in your avatar sexy as hell.
Is that a GT3 RS with TT wing and custom color or the opposite variant?

 

He started a thread a little while ago with very impressive pics...
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...-pictures.html

It is a 997TT with a GT3 front end, bumper, and Techart wing. He uses a water cooled system so he doesn't need the side intakes.

Very impressive.

 

Thanks and I agree. I originally thought TT with GT3 bumper, but the center exit exhaust led me to believe RS with TT wing...either way, gorgeous.

 

you should ask evoms, I believe they know everything about vtg's.

As I said some time before there is no chance to reach more than 580-590 Ps with modified 997 tt turbines.
Some of tuners in europe offer 600 or 630 Ps but it's lie.

with turbines I offered you will have the highest possible vtg's power but later responce. The power is raising up to rev cut.

I believe Us tuners will call it 850HP kit with this turbines
9ff used this turbines in 670PS kit.

 

Look at the trap speeds and you can see the power those cars making...trap speeds and 60-130 times prove everything...

 

don't know this us numbers.
BTW you are from Russia or Us, why you care about this tests?
I measured 0-200 in 10,2 second. 0-300 in 28,7second.
most of 0-100 was in 3,4s. I used racelogic.

 

I am from Russia but tune my car in US...

I dont care about any results except mine...

Here info on my previous car with SPI 700/750 VTGr kit:

I was able to get 7.23 seconds on a 60-130mph run on a 2.7% decline. The car should run in the 6s when I run race gas.

I also did a 0-60 and 0-100mph run (same run) on a very flat road, and the results are as follows:

0-10 0.2
0-20 0.7
0-30 1.1
0-40 1.5
0-50 2.2
0-60 2.9
0-70 3.6
0-80 4.5
0-90 5.4
0-100 6.4

For that run I brake boosted up to about 2500 rpms and flew off the line. Sport mode on, PSM off. I let the the transmission shift completely on its own. 60ft was 1.7 seconds, 1/8 mile was 7.0 @ 105.3mph. Max long G during the run was 1.207 Gs @ 34 mph. Very impressive.

 

GT RUS, how much your 0-200km/h time? It's 0-124mph...

The 0-200km/h measurement is something I would Like to get from US tuner Porsches!

That acceleration is usually tested in European articles (so the 0-200km/h time can be found for many EU tuned Porsches) but we usually don't have that kind of data from the States...That would reduce critisism...

 

I disagree. If you are looking for acceleration as a primary measure of power, I would think that 100-200 KPH is a better measure, as it eliminates any variability in launch technique, wheel spin, etc.

I believe eclou posted data on his AWE kit...100-200 KPH in 6 seconds...which I believe is on par with the RT12 650. Karol's car ran 6.8s if my calculation is correct.

 

Someone has done especially the 100-200 run with the RT12? Has or not, I believe your claim, because I have seen those 700hp beasts being fast!! (I have a old 996TT with 530hp and additional downforce, PBOX shows 7 seconds..not fast but can keep up at the track )

Of course a better measurement is the 100-200 you talk about, BUT at least with all the data I have seen you should not compare a dedicated/optimal 100-200 run to a one that has been just calculated from the 0-200 run. I usually see 100-200 runs "calculated" from magazine tests and they do not tell the whole truth because on most cars the use of 2nd gear hurts the 100-200 time...

And one good point is that there is a lot of 0-200 data available...(Well actually this claim is a bit poor because most cars are simply too slow in 0-200 when compared to this forums cars so the data isn't useful! The magazine test cars are usually too slow for this audience )

Some examples though:

- One could compare a much modded car to this:
Manthey 996 GT2 685hp: 9.3 seconds (test by Autobild, street tires, additional downforce)

- One could compare a bit modded car to this:
Wendland 997 Turbo 530hp: 11.1 seconds (test by Sport Auto, MPSC, otherwise car very stock with steel brakes, manual etc.)

- This tested by the owner:
RS-Tuning 997 Turbo 544hp: 10.4 seconds

(if someone goes to measure the same acceleration, don't worry about the start, the Germans are not fast off the line either.. )

 

In my opinion 0-200km/h acceleration test is the most important one. You can see all the data's like lag on first two gears etc....
Of course there is a lot of launch technique but at the end of the day who cares let's believe that people interested in this measurements know how to drive the car.

 

one more thing you can watch 0-60km/h parametr so you know should you accelerate up to 200 or start again.
0-60km/h I have in 1,4s when is more you can try again.

 

I have friend of mine who owns 997 GT2 might be interested in these VTG's. Does it require different ECU?