Dude, That is simply mind boggling. Blows me away. I don't know how much these motors can take right out of the box but that's some serious numbers on any dyno (unless the numbers are inflated somehow, sometimes corrections factors will do this, not saying this is). I really like the shape of your tq/hp curves. Doesn't die off like many I've seen recently. That thing is tuned with precision. I guess it has to be at those levels. Good luck with it.

Sledge only recorded 915rwhp on a DJ when we retuned it, it would go into tire shake on the dyno, so we turned it up on the street, that is when we ran the 4.25 60-130, I think that is the only way we could compare these two cars.

Absolutely. Dynos are good for waving your d*ck around, but real world is where it's at:p

Dynapacks, while generally considered more accurate, ON AVERAGE read about 8%-10% higher than Dynojets and about 15%-20% higher than Mustang dynos, partially because the drivetrain loss of actually turning the wheels and the losses caused from transferring that power from the tires to the roller are no longer there. That said, Dynapacks can be calibrated to give Dynojet numbers, so those percentages up there aren't a given. You can make a Dynapack or Mustang read anything you want by changing the load values.

Also, when I say accurate it is not to say that the number it gives is better but rather that the results are more consistently repeatable, giving a better view of how much power you've actually added via mods or tuning when you dyno again and when comparing to other cars dynoed at the same place. Tuning is the only useful way to use a dyno plot given that the day's conditions and calibration of different dynos can result in wildly different numbers even for the same car, make comparing different dyno plots from across the country an inexact science at best.

So when will anyone understand that dyno numbers are arbitrary? Run it in the 1/4 mile to show actual power. Please no 60-130 times.

John H

Unless your junk is on the short end of the stick. hilarious Ultimately it wll boil down to real numbers but this dyno is the real deal. Maybe not as much as a Mustang but it is putting out some massive power. You can't deny that. You also have to look at the reputation of the tuner. How well known is the person, is he known to inflate numbers, validation with street times, etc....

Agreed on all points except the last. While a good indicator of power, 1/4 times are very operator dependent and certainly not as easily reproducible as a 60-130 time.

Looks good & welcome to the Proto E85 club how long before you get her back ?

Forget all the numbers because they just cause controversy in the end. Forget it all. If it is a number it is too easy to say it is larger or smaller than another, we have been taught this since grade school. Sometimes I wish I could just post a dyno graph with no HP or TQ readings, just the curve vs rpm.

How does the car feel, are you pleased with the end result when you are driving it? At the end of the day, for most people, that is what matters most.

Good one Ed. When I use the mens room, I have to warn the guys next to me that "OK gents, I'm shaking to the left and now I'm gonna shake to the right" hilarious
Where did you ever dig up that photo of me. hilarious

Good question. Todd sends me this dyno and then disappears for a few days--lol. I haven't talked to him since. He did say he needs to adjust the fueling. God knows why. Maybe he wants to break 1K on his dyno. hilarious

If you are already at 983, I would insist that he break 1K before he sends it back! hilarious

No emphasis on "break" mind you...

Push the easy button to 2.0 bar that should = 1001

You have a way with words. :p Point well taken, tho. :)

If anything, I'm moving the dial back.

Well said neil . :)

Great numbers. Stellar results for a stock block!!

E85 can get addicting. :)