Any 2016 GTS owners? Appreciate your thoughts.
#16
just picked up a 2016 GTS last week, quite impressed with the interior worksmanship, along with the feedback from air suspension.
the PCM screen resolution is a bit dated IMO, and i'm coming from a 2011 BMW F10 535..
apparently the front side markers are different for the 2016, so my dealer wasn't able to order them yet...
the PCM screen resolution is a bit dated IMO, and i'm coming from a 2011 BMW F10 535..
apparently the front side markers are different for the 2016, so my dealer wasn't able to order them yet...
#19
Because the computer will detect a burnt out bulb and prompt a replacement. Yeah euro cars don't have it at all I know. Just want the cleaner "look" with it off at night. For daytime I'm plasti dipping it black for now. My dealer is getting me the clear or smoke ones whenever they come out.
You would have to check the resistance of the bulb to see which resistor would be needed.
#20
just picked up a 2016 GTS last week, quite impressed with the interior worksmanship, along with the feedback from air suspension.
the PCM screen resolution is a bit dated IMO, and i'm coming from a 2011 BMW F10 535..
apparently the front side markers are different for the 2016, so my dealer wasn't able to order them yet...
the PCM screen resolution is a bit dated IMO, and i'm coming from a 2011 BMW F10 535..
apparently the front side markers are different for the 2016, so my dealer wasn't able to order them yet...
#21
Thinking of making change from 2014 Range Rover Sport Supercharged to a 2016 GTS.... drove it today. Handles much better than RRS. Power seemed okay, quick, but not fast... didn't go past 5000 rpm as car was brand new. Worried that I will be "disappointed" coming from 500+ HP... but it's lighter and feels it. RRS is very "trucky"....
Thoughts on the GTS are appreciated. I like the torque increase over the prior GTS'.... clearly doesn't sound as good.
Thoughts on the GTS are appreciated. I like the torque increase over the prior GTS'.... clearly doesn't sound as good.
I think it will out handle most GTS's without those options. I love it, been driving it to work instead of my 997. Don't get me wrong I'm keeping the 911 too.
#23
Nice pic.
So went to the LA auto show and now they have a gloss black option for the front air scoops on the bumper and the horizontal grills in front . They also have the rear letters Porsche cayenne GTS in gloss black. It looked really good. Especially since all the rage is now gloss black vs Matte black.
So went to the LA auto show and now they have a gloss black option for the front air scoops on the bumper and the horizontal grills in front . They also have the rear letters Porsche cayenne GTS in gloss black. It looked really good. Especially since all the rage is now gloss black vs Matte black.
Last edited by jtorrebl; 12-25-2015 at 01:46 AM.
#25
I've had the 2016 GTS since April '15 - 6,000 miles on the clock including a (pushbike) towing run into upper Michigan and a week-long return trip from Chicago to southern Florida. Overall the GTS is a great GT - you can pull 800 mile (shared driving) days and feel fresh when you get to your destination. I switched from a 2013 Panny GTS and REALLY miss the NA V8 soundtrack, but would really recommend both the PDLS and ACC - I've used both extensively and they work a treat....
#26
#28
I've had some seat time in both the RRSSC and GTS. We built exhaust components for and tuned the RRSSC, and once you add extra power it's a really impressive machine. That said, the handling of the GTS is really crisp. Porsche did a great job. Head to the dealership and drive them back to back!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WheelB
Other British Cars
0
10-16-2015 10:48 AM