Have you ever driven one??? raygr - if you put your stradale on a scale, you'll find it's notably heavier than that. what ferrari states and what ferrar builds don't always coincide :) great post jmmitias. doody. |
Originally posted by Hamann7 All Ferraris hold their value better due to their superior marketing strategy and "bling" factor. That has nothing to do with how good the cars are. Many people I know get out of their GT2's because the cars scare the **** out of them. This is why the resale values are low right now. But that's ok, when the real enthusiasts pick up the car and realize how great they are, prices will stabilize and perhaps even increase one day. If not, so what... it's one of the best buy secrets of the decade! You guys who rag on the GT2 obviously have not had much seat time in one. I used to think the GT2 was way overpriced until I drove one. Then I realized how superior it is to the Turbo. Ben based on your assessment of the CGT, the Stradale is perfect for you. I don't see how you guys can necessarily single out the GT2 as being overpriced. You actually think the 996 Turbo is a good value??? Especially with X-50? The GT3 is a damn bargain... but a GT2 is certainly worth more than $150K if that's what an X-50 Turbo retails for. Let's face it, all Porsches are massively overpriced, but so are Ferraris. If you use overall performance as an indicator, the GT2's price isn't that bad. WIth the market the way it is now, it is truly an unbeatable bargain. Just ask Watt. |
Originally posted by rockitman I have to respectfully disagree that a GT3 is overpriced for what it is. Considering it's not your ordinary Carrera motor or tranny, 50K for those components alone...100K base for that car is an exceptional value imho...Have you ever driven one??? :confused: BTW, got in another 250 miles today - a large portion of which was crazy fun mountain driving. |
Hey Ben,
There are a bunch of us who take off midweek and drive up to Palomar for the day. Email me if you want to be included. emailm3@aol.com |
Originally posted by cosmos Hey Ben, There are a bunch of us who take off midweek and drive up to Palomar for the day. Email me if you want to be included. emailm3@aol.com |
I too initially thought the GT3 was overpriced. Then I drove one and started to think about all the ways it was improved over the C2, no comparison between the two in my mind. I also thought about how the price and performance compares with the TT and GT2 as well as other brands. It didn't seem so expensive...it even looked reasonable relative to similar cars.
It's true that higher priced cars carry higher margins and the GT3 is no exception. They also sell in lesser numbers, so the R&D costs (and marketing, production, overhead, etc) get amortized over a smaller number of cars, hence the real profit margins may be lower. |
upon further reflection, i overspoke re: the GT3. that engine alone is a quite substantial cost component. for a car you can buy in the 90s, it's tough to find anything that comes close on a price-performance basis, so regardless of whatever margins might be like, it's still probably the best bang for the buck available today.
doody. |
Originally posted by Doody upon further reflection, i overspoke re: the GT3. that engine alone is a quite substantial cost component. for a car you can buy in the 90s, it's tough to find anything that comes close on a price-performance basis, so regardless of whatever margins might be like, it's still probably the best bang for the buck available today. doody. |
Originally posted by ben, lj at under 1/2 the $ of the GT3, the Z06 probably owns that title. |
The Ducati Principle
until someone drives a CS there is just no chance of understanding why and how it satisfies more even if slower
Interesting thread with no conclusions, but it does seem the wall of opinion from those lucky enough to have/had both favor the CS as a feeling. This reminds me of my many years as a two wheeler. My most favored bikes were my Ducati's, especially the Super Lights. They weren't as powerful or as fast as the big heavy Honda/Suzuki/Kawaski muscle bikes of the era, but they just felt so much sweeter to ride, and those power bikes were always left trailing them in the canyons and on the tracks back then. As I read more and more of these CS vs. the rest threads I am seriously reminded of the Ducati principle. Sadly a CS is outside my window of opportunity, so the GT3 is it for me, but it's nice to know there is something to step up to. Watt's quandary is an interesting one. Once you've climbed Mt Everest, where do you go from there? I have a big soft spot for the 575 boy racer they just announced, in the spirit of the ProDrive cars. It isn't really that expensive, and it (the Maranello) is a car that has been called the greatest car ever for years by all the journalists on both continents since it was first introduced. This the the best, at it's best. Watt, your next Everest? |
ray
what you say is true, but CS's actually weigh in at 3000 with fliuds, but still 175 lighter than gt2 and feel much lighter as you said. a gt2 leaves the umbrella price at a dealership and it isIMMEDIATELY valued by the market at 50k less; this is not occurring with CS. tyson a gt2 is worth 140 for a new 03 to me and 155 for an 04. i would never spend 04 gt2 window, i'd use the $ for a CS!!! markedy more value to me |
Originally posted by ben, lj Yes, the GT2 is a rip roaring bargain - in the after market. Yes, it's faster than a CS. Yes, based solely on overall performance, the GT2 wins. No, the GT2 is no where near as fun which is my criteria. http://jackspictures.com/images/360%...20together.jpg IMHO, the Gt3 is a relative bargain and a great car (as they all are), but it's still not as much of a thrilling/adrenaline pumping drive as the CS. Numbers, whether it be HP or track times, don't always correlate with the FUN factor of a car. ;) |
Your garage puts a smile on my face Jack...Are you getting another 4 post lift for the CGT??? or is the GT2 being replaced with it????
|
I've had my GT3 since February, it is a great car and I love drving it. I am on day #10 with my CS...I've been waiting for it since March. I've driven F355s and 360s before...I like them a lot, but they are not as engaging as the GT3. Somehow I didn't expect to enjoy the CS so much that if I had to choose just 1, I'd have to go with the CS. To me, the CS drives like a lesser version of the Enzo...same kind of fun, just not quite as monstrous.
Perfomance wise, the Z06 may deliver at half of the GT3 price...but I don't feel that the driving experience is even close to the GT3. There are always cars that can turn incredible lap times that better these GT3, GT2, CS and so on...at a fraction of the cost. I tend to think I love these cars because they are so fun on the street to cruise, tackle the windy roads or just ripping up and down a long stretch...and will hold its own pretty good on the track. There may be a lot of people who desires these cars...but really only the few that appreciate them for what they really are. I think that is why you see these cars come up for sale. Why else would you part with them? Terry |
One of the most common questions that people have always asked me when they see my cars is "so, which is your favorate?". I'd always have to go through a five minute speech as to the GT2 is faster , the Modena is funnier, the 993TT is a classic air cooled porsche and so on.
That all changed after I traded in the Modena for a CS. Now my answer is a two second response. Speed, power, torque, potential lap times all included, the CS is the most amount of fun you can have on four wheels! Just my .02. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands