The Video bellow shows whos faster. GTR or Aventador.

 

What this shows is the GTR wins the 1/4 mile race and looses the 1 mile top speed.
Now lets run the same race with an Alpha 10 that still costs 50,000 dollars less than the Lambo and OOOPPPss
The gtr kills it .
The GTR kills the Lambo on any road race course stock or whatever.
Straight line racing is for Red Necks, they have a show for you with 7 liter and up BOW TIE blocks.

 

I'm sorry but even with a Alpha whatever, comparing a GTR to an Aventador is plain ridiculous. GTR is obviously very fast, but I wouldn't even compare a GTR with a Porsche less alone an Aventador. You can make any car fast. You can make a turd go 200mph around a turn and its still a turd. A GTR is an amazing performer with questionable looks and a reasonable low price... Excellent value. However, an Aventador is a limited production, über expensive piece of Italian awesomeness. It's like comparing a really nice Casio to a Rolex, AP or Patek. ****, my IPhone keeps better time than my Rolex; doesn't mean that I'll take the IPhone over it.

 

You know so little about performance Sub-zero.
I would never own a rolex because it keep terible time.
Do some research some day and we can have an informed chat

 

Yes, you are right.

 

Yeah, drag racing these cars is like comparing which is faster around Laguna Seca - a Chevy Volt or Toyota Prius.

At some point - people stop caring.

(Inevitably, though, there are those that tune their Prius, in the hopes of beating a GT-R or Porsche... not making this up - check out Prius forums)

 

I think you'd be the only one in history of all people that ever saw a car, ever.

 

No, you won't ever own a Rolex because usually you have to know grammar and spelling before you can afford one. Go do some research, an Aventador is $250K more than a Alpha 10 genius. A GT-R is almost a second slower to 1320 and the Aventador ran a 3 second faster lap on Top Gear and an identical 7:24 around the Ring, so consider yourself "informed".

 

 

This much hostility over super cars and their respective perfomance?

 

Cool video thanks for sharing

 

01:16.5 Lamborghini Aventador
01:17.8 Nissan GT-R

???

Don't mean to take anything away from the Lambo, as 1 sec is still a pretty wide gap, but it is a little less than the 3sec implied raping...

Also - DBA R35's run about 10.8-9 (11.0 is normal) in the 1/4 stock. If the Lambo is running a second faster in the 1320, that would mean they are running 9 seconds stock.

That is extremely impressive. Please point me in that direction.

 

I was looking at this older list where the 2nd Gen GT-R was listed at 1:19.7.
http://twinrev.com/cars/top-gear-track-times-6202468

Didn't see the 3rd Gen time. The quarter times I looked at were from Road and Track. 10.4 for the Vent (I have seen 10.2 elsewhere) and 11.2 for a 2013 Premium GT-R which is why I said almost a second (.8). Just correcting the statement about the GT-R being faster in the quarter. As you stated, this whole comparison is pretty useless. I was just bringing up the fact that the Aventador wouldn't get killed by a GT-R on any road course.

 

Roger. I'd speculate the average GT-R owner will push their vehicles a lot harder on a road course than the average Aventador owner.

I'm actually lost on what some refer to the generations of each GT-R. Each year, there are incremental improvements that keep raising the bar. I'm just waiting for the new refresh (MY2015), and see what the real R35 is supposed to be (~MY2017).

 

WOw, this is pretty interesting! but one problem. GTR was not modded. if it was, then the results would be different...sorry lambo...