996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

800 hp on K16 Billets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #181  
Old 01-18-2014, 10:18 AM
GT996's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 429
Rep Power: 59
GT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond repute
Wait...wait...wait...

I am building my engine right now and have a lame A28 and some mild mods - nothing that you don't have (a crank, some rods, pistons - the necessary stuff, you know).

Can I come, too, please? I need these 10 grand

Andreas
 
  #182  
Old 01-18-2014, 10:27 AM
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 3,636
Rep Power: 254
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
TO AMS ,,this repeat question,
AMS,,Not to get off of this hot topic,,LOL,,
BUT do you guys still work with Tony/EPL on tuning 996Turbos OR do you do it yourselves now?
Thanks..
 
  #183  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:18 AM
AMS's Avatar
AMS
AMS is offline
Former Vendor
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 512
Rep Power: 0
AMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by johnspeed
TO AMS ,,this repeat question,
AMS,,Not to get off of this hot topic,,LOL,,
BUT do you guys still work with Tony/EPL on tuning 996Turbos OR do you do it yourselves now?
Thanks..
Hi John,

Yes we still work with Tony. We can physically tune the Porsche ourselves but we don't have the hardware/software package that Tony offers to easily flash these cars. We use EPL software/hardware and we've been involved in the logging/tuning process for all the tunes made for our packages. Tony knows what he's doing tuning wise and is also a smart software guy.

Hopefully that answers your question.

Best regards,

Martin
 
  #184  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:26 AM
AMS's Avatar
AMS
AMS is offline
Former Vendor
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 512
Rep Power: 0
AMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond reputeAMS has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by GT996
Wait...wait...wait...

I am building my engine right now and have a lame A28 and some mild mods - nothing that you don't have (a crank, some rods, pistons - the necessary stuff, you know).

Can I come, too, please? I need these 10 grand

Andreas
The A28 is not lame, at all. I'm assuming you're referring to our 997tt? The car's motor was never opened up when it ran 9.97 at 144mph, made all those dyo pulls, or ran many standing mile pulls. Same goes for the customers 997tt we built that has been running around for the last 9,500 miles at over 700whp on pump gas. He is on a stock engine also.

You don't have to build the motor when doing an A28 build but you will be safer and can push it harder if you do.

Sure you are welcome to come out to our shop anytime.

Do you have a 996 or 997? The 997 engine has a higher volumetric efficiency at higher RPM's than the 996, meaning it makes more horsepower up top. The 997 engine with the same turbo's will make more horsepower than the 996.

-Martin
 
  #185  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:35 AM
GT996's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 429
Rep Power: 59
GT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond reputeGT996 has a reputation beyond repute
Martin,

I was just joking aorund - I know that the A28 is not lame. Thought I can make some easy 10 grand quickly

I am located in Germany, so a trip to your shop needs some preparation

Andreas
 
  #186  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:43 AM
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 3,636
Rep Power: 254
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by AMS
Hi John,

Yes we still work with Tony. We can physically tune the Porsche ourselves but we don't have the hardware/software package that Tony offers to easily flash these cars. We use EPL software/hardware and we've been involved in the logging/tuning process for all the tunes made for our packages. Tony knows what he's doing tuning wise and is also a smart software guy.

Hopefully that answers your question.

Best regards,

Martin

HI,,Thanks...Just asking because at on time ,I believe someone told me from your shop in the recent past, that you guys are doing all your own tuning in house now..I know he developed the 16 billet package with you guys..
 
  #187  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:50 AM
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,846
Rep Power: 455
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
I had the car in my possession twice, it has a carpet, crazy stereo which I gave Randy **** about, 2wd but so is almost everyone else running fast, and he probably added 240lbs plus ( if you seen him you know).
The car dynoed 570rwhp I think, ran 5.87 sec on NON 7 blade hta wheels... these were blouch billets... I actually tuned it on the street ... no dyno needed..
What kind of boost and gas was he running in the car to get the 5.87? I have asked that numerous times but no one has been able or willing to answer that question. Is that some sort of a secret as it seems that is pretty relevant in the big scheme of things? 91, 93, 100, 109 octane, what? 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7 bar?? Not trying to stir the pot, just curious because without knowing that, the 5.87 number doesn't tell a lot.

I also just looked at the AMS ad for the billets and for anyone that can read English, it should be pretty clear cut that they advertise about 550whp on pump. Seems pretty realistic to me so I don't know what the hoopla is about. Maybe 800 crank (what is that 680whp?) would be attainable on a one time hero shot but common sense would dictate that would not be on a streetable repeatable set up. Don't all tuners advertise the big hero number (pretty much always a crank HP for obvious reasons) at the top to get your attention (basic marketing 101) and then you see the real numbers (generally WHP) in the smaller print? As long as one can read and comprehend the English language, one can generally weed through the bs. I certainly have no dog in the hunt nor am I taking any sides. It's just an observation after reading a thread that has turned out to be pretty embarrassing for some of the participants. Some of what has been said or stated make me cringe..
 

Last edited by pwdrhound; 01-18-2014 at 01:00 PM.
  #188  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:16 PM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHICAGO
Age: 55
Posts: 9,720
Rep Power: 601
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
I believe he openly discussed the boost and gas used. I think 101 and or ms109. Boost for sure wasn't more then 1.5 because he wasn't making anymore power on dyno just blowing hot air. Look up his thread it's all there I believe. And he did it on cheap street tires If my memory serves me right.
Mind you i spent a week on it going over some drama from previous installs. Missing check valves, major boost leaks, etc. We spent slot of time getting it 100%. I harp on that often because members buy kits and think they will automatically go fast.
There was no magic here. None.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




  #189  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:51 PM
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,846
Rep Power: 455
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
I believe he openly discussed the boost and gas used. I think 101 and or ms109. Boost for sure wasn't more then 1.5 because he wasn't making anymore power on dyno just blowing hot air. Look up his thread it's all there I believe. And he did it on cheap street tires If my memory serves me right.
Mind you i spent a week on it going over some drama from previous installs. Missing check valves, major boost leaks, etc. We spent slot of time getting it 100%. I harp on that often because members buy kits and think they will automatically go fast.
There was no magic here. None.
Ok, thank you for the reply. I didn't read his thread (didn't know there was one) but directly asked the question earlier in this thread and received no reply so I thought maybe he didn't want to share that info for some reason. It seems that when people start quoting numbers they should always include boost and gas type used as that is key in the whole equation. I'd be curious what his set up would have run on pump at a normal 1.2 or 1.3 bar of boost as that is what 99% of people run and thus would probably be most relevant. Once again, this goes back to tuners and people posting one time super numbers on high boost race gas set ups. When the 5.87 was run, was it done on a road that was verified perfectly flat? As you know even a 1 or 2% gradient will wildly skew the numbers one way or the other. Was headwind/tailwind taken into account? Ideally you'd want to run the car in one direction and then immediately run it in the opposite direction and average the two figures to arrive at a factual number.

Also, doesn't the ECU do a throttle body shutdown at 1.4 bar? I always thought that was a built in feature by Porsche. Are people bypassing this safety device in order to run glory boost?
 

Last edited by pwdrhound; 01-18-2014 at 01:05 PM.
  #190  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:54 PM
mod mike's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: calif
Posts: 854
Rep Power: 50
mod mike has a spectacular aura aboutmod mike has a spectacular aura aboutmod mike has a spectacular aura about
as a psychotherapist i've always said Porsche owners are a personality type, not just car owners.. this tread shows that is not about the data, its about being right. i question the longevity of any high HP engine and everyone is entitled to their own opinion. thank buddha that i've had a lifetime love affair with Porsche from the age of eight, otherwise my ego maybe driving the car... peace and love to you all!!
 
  #191  
Old 01-18-2014, 01:03 PM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHICAGO
Age: 55
Posts: 9,720
Rep Power: 601
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
Ok, thank you for the reply. I didn't read his thread (didn't know there was one) but directly asked the question earlier in this thread and received no reply so I thought maybe he didn't want to share that info for some reason. It seems that when people start quoting numbers they should always include boost and gas type used as that is key in the whole equation. I'd be curious what his set up would have run on pump at a normal 1.2 or 1.3 bar of boost as that is what 99% of people run and thus would probably be most relevant. Once again, this goes back to tuners and people posting one time super numbers on high boost race gas set ups. When the 5.87 was run, was it done on a road that was verified perfectly flat? As you know even a 1 or 2% gradient will wildly skew the numbers one way or the other. Ideally you'd want to run the car in one direction and then immediately run it in the opposite direction and average the two figures. Also, doesn't the ECU do a throttle body shutdown at 1.4 bar? I always thought that was a built in feature by Porsche. Are people bypassing this safety device in order to run glory boost?
Yes of course It was verified. He ran 6.3 and 6.4 I believe at 1.3 bar. Again you can ask him. But I do have some files he sent somewhere.
1.5 bar is not considered glory boost. Most guys run .35 bar on pump gas which I disagree with. I run 1.25 bar max. On race gas ( depending which grade ) I tune for 1.4 to 1.55 max. That's my limit. I've seen others run 1.7 bar on stock motors. There are plenty of those members that had done it. The has a ebc too. Most guys that want to control boost do that - nothing new.
Randy did many 60 to 130s. His numbers match and wasn't one lucky run.
Ecu doesn't shut the TB down if you know how to let the limit off. That's easy.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




  #192  
Old 01-18-2014, 01:19 PM
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 1,215
Rep Power: 116
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by AMS
Finally some information out of you so we can sort through your BS. So you're saying that when you were making 650crank HP on your K16 based turbos you were making 900+ ft lbs? Well well, the person saying that running these K16 turbo's to death and maxing them out isn't realistic and people don't run them like that. That's how you got your quick 6-130 time on those K16 (besides your car being light weight and 2wd), you ran the most boost those thing could put out to get that torque. 900ft-lbs.. lets see. you were probably spiking close to 30psi and then boost dropped like a rock to low 20's as the turbo's were maxed out. 900 ft-lbs..650hp.. congrats, you just gave your Porsche a diesel powerband.

If you've looked at the internals of a diesel, which make lots of torque, you'll see how beefy and heavy it all is. It needs that to put up with all the cylinder pressure to make that torque. making more HP up top is much easier on the engine than making lots of torque down low. How many headgaskets did you go through playing with your car?

And that's why you have no quarter mile time or mph.. because you make lots of torque and little HP. Your speed would show that, and anything in the higher RPM range would show up as crappy MPH or crappy high speed pulls (on your claimed 900+ ftlbs and 650hp)

I'll be glad to race your car with a GTR or a Porsche, let's set something up.

-Martin

No, you misunderstood me. I wasn't running 900 ft lbs torque with K16s!
I was referring to my current build. Is it even possible to make 900 tq on
K16s? I don't know but I wouldn't think so.

I was making 600 wheel torque and 550 wheel hp on ms109 @ 1.5 bar on
K16s.

I'm making 1000 hp crank and about a 1000 crank tq on 3073s on e85
and 28 lbs boost.
 
  #193  
Old 01-18-2014, 01:43 PM
Tim941NYC's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Long island NY
Posts: 3,319
Rep Power: 379
Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !Tim941NYC Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by layinback
No, you misunderstood me. I wasn't running 900 ft lbs torque with K16s!
I was referring to my current build. Is it even possible to make 900 tq on
K16s? I don't know but I wouldn't think so.

I was making 600 wheel torque and 550 wheel hp on ms109 @ 1.5 bar on
K16s.

I'm making 1000 hp crank and about a 1000 crank tq on 3073s on e85
and 28 lbs boost.

I am making..... more popcorn..
 
  #194  
Old 01-18-2014, 01:46 PM
Because_R4CEC4R's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 25
Because_R4CEC4R has much to be proud ofBecause_R4CEC4R has much to be proud ofBecause_R4CEC4R has much to be proud ofBecause_R4CEC4R has much to be proud ofBecause_R4CEC4R has much to be proud ofBecause_R4CEC4R has much to be proud ofBecause_R4CEC4R has much to be proud ofBecause_R4CEC4R has much to be proud of
How is this virus of a thread still going days later? Martin, honestly you have nothing less to prove to anyone. People are trolling trying to get a reaction, clearly there's no one here who has had a bad experience with AMS work.

All of this discussion is about the ad so let's actually look at the two components:

"Bolt-on turbo's capable of 800 hp while retaining stock spool up! Quicker spool and power on par or exceeding the K24/18G"

Note it says capable of, not "producing 800 hp". This is similar to Nissan saying the car GT-R is capable of 0-60 in 2.7s. If you go out on any given day, the time will vary depending on temperature, traction surface, quality of the tires, life in the cars fluids etc etc.

Are we expecting Nissan to produce an add saying "0-60 in 2.7 seconds if you're lucky but probably more consistently in the low threes!". Nope cause damn it all I want to tell people my car can do it in the mid to high twos, that's part of what I'm paying for.

The second part is the clarification portion:

"Estimated horsepower output
550-580 hp / 570-600 lb/ft of torque on pump gas
600-630 hp / 660-690 lb/ft of torque with optional AMS Fuel Upgrade Kit
660-690 hp / 750-780 lb/ft of torque on race gas.
800 hp Capable with supporting modifications (AMS intake pipes, AMS intercooler upgrade, etc...)"

Clearly the power output is Estimated. It also leads with 550-580 on pump gas, then if you purchase more you can get up into the 600-630 range. Now if you're ready to throw in some race gas you can get it up to 660-690 hp, not bad. Now assuming you would like to cause your accountant more stress you can then build up further to a car capable of 800 hp. Capable of again is not stating a guarantee every day.

I love 6SpeedOnline, I stop by a dozen times a day to read things see what people are doing etc. I've been impressed with the community. I only recently became a Porsche owner, previously I owned an Evo X then an e46 M3. Those forums were filled with people name calling, trolling, bad mouthing respected vendors and making up BS stories about making tens of thousands of dollars a day and being to cool for school etc etc. It's disturbing that such a great community is degrading like this for no reason than they intentionally or unintentionally misinterpreted an ad.

Martin / Markski,

I get that you guys have had issues in the past. And for whatever reason it keeps coming up in different threads (I've seen it a few times now). Remember Pepsi compares themselves to Coke because Coke is the big boy. Coke doesn't compare itself to Pepsi.

As a potential buyer with some assemblance of financial wherewithal and a love burning the liquid dinos this is turning me off both companies. Can we not just let this issue die and focus on business? The points have all been made.
 
  #195  
Old 01-18-2014, 02:12 PM
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 1,215
Rep Power: 116
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MCGT3
Once again proof that intelligent men can act like fools.

What a giant pile of drivel you've created here Randy, I really thought you'd grown a bit as a person, or at least forum participant.

It was a thread much like this where we had our first interaction, and I'm sure you remember the outcome of that.

It's funny to me that you make fun of Martin for making offers to pay for flights, show you empirical data, pay for the whole thing - because that's exactly the kind of **** you were talking on the thread when we became acquainted. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT YOU WERE THE ONE GOING TO SHOW ALL US BIG HP GUYS THAT WE COULDN'T DRIVE, THAT WE WERE ALL A JOKE ETC, ETC. I then offered to race you on a Road Course of your choosing anywhere in the country and, *chirp, chirp*. Things got REAL quiet. Then there were PM's in which you basically stated ALL tuners/builders suck (except Marksi apparently) and they were all out to screw us. I still have them here somewhere I'm sure. In the PM you name EVOMS, VIVID, SWITZER and OTHERS as "BUZZARDS" who are merely here to feed off us poor dumb car enthusiasts.

Now its AMS' turn I guess? I'm all for a good open discussion regarding products (sub par exhausts & cats for example), but when you start telling a person, or a business that they are flat out lying and then start the schoolyard BS - it's enough. It's really enough. You have had a "run in" at one time or another with almost everyone in the thread, I get it, its your thing. To go on a "smear campaign" (remember that quote?) against a vendor is just bull****. If you don't believe their numbers - feel free to question them, but please do so in a respectful manner.

FULL DISCLOSURE: I just had a BIG build finished at AMS, a BIG build. They are without a doubt the most straightforward, transparent, no bull**** builder/tuner I have ever dealt with. I consider Eric a friend, and I respect Martin for the business and business culture he has created. As far as you ranking on them about "Jap" this and "Jap" that - its firstly an OFFENSIVE RACIST term and secondly attempts to discount the achievements they've made - you are better than that man, try to show it.

If AMS wants to do well in the Porsche game, they will on their own merits. The amount of engineering, modeling, finite element analysis, and street R & D that they are willing to do is second to none - except maybe Stuttgart.

Happy New Year everyone!

Mike

Mike, I was very clear, early on in this thread regarding AMS's reputation in the
Japanese tuning arena. My use of the term "Jap tuner" wasn't meant to be racist.
I was under the assumption that the term was innocuous when used in the context
of tuning. I am not a racist.

I did not discount ANY of their previous achievements. Love 'em or hate 'em, these
fellows have built some of the fastest street cars in the world. I'm saying that
I suspect that they're using their previous achievements to make exaggerated
horsepower claims in the Porsche world. I am also saying that they don't know
Porsche cars.

I have said it in this thread and I will say it again, I DON'T MIND BEING SOLD!!!
I don't mind folks stretching the facts.........that's part of sales sometimes. I
don't think that this board is comprised of predators and victims. I do however
believe that a lot of bs goes unchecked here. The back and forth about flying
me up to shy town and all of that...........I was giving him a hard time. It was
already a ridiculous situation and I was being ridiculous.

But 800 hp on a k16? 900 hp on a alpha 28? I'm sorry Mike, do YOU believe that?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 800 hp on K16 Billets?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 AM.