Upgrade Turbos Dyno Numbers
#23
Because a tuner claimed that the stock headers " design " really bad. So that's about +650whp on Dynojet?
#24
Originally Posted by Thunder915
Nice!
Because a tuner claimed that the stock headers " design " really bad. So that's about +650whp on Dynojet?
Because a tuner claimed that the stock headers " design " really bad. So that's about +650whp on Dynojet?
#26
Yes more or less... The big factor in this "packg" is the COBB custom tune
Last edited by webcarconnection; 12-26-2015 at 08:20 AM.
#28
Happy holidays everyone! Thunder, I don't think I ever made any quotes about anything being really bad. The Kline Innovation equal length headers produce a pretty amazing sound and have proven to be beneficial. Can you max out the fuel system with upgraded turbochargers and no manifolds? Yes you can. I love the Kline manifolds as does every one who is running them. Sounds outstanding! There's always several factors like budget and such that may dictate what a customer gets and when. First people wanted coating. Now it seems they don't LOL. The good thing is we have a System for everyone. Just like the exhaust. Several guys have switched to the Kline and they have been very pleased. If not I would take it back. Customers always have a choice and I stand behind everything as always
Last edited by SamboTT@ByDesign; 12-26-2015 at 04:20 PM.
#29
I must agree that the AP is the instrumental key here. I have been able to work with other tuners along with Cobbs support to make even the other headers out there which were losing power work better through custom tuning.
#30
So you traded losing 50hp and 80tq at 3300 rpm for gaining 80hp and 65tq at peak? It looks like the car loses power and torque everywhere under 4k rpm. I will be interested in seeing if there's any benefit to that in your acceleration times. Please keep us posted!
- Patrick
- Patrick