991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Porsche 991S 0-60 5.96 sec

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 06:24 AM
  #1  
cmelb's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
From: USA
Rep Power: 0
cmelb is infamous around these parts
Porsche 991S 0-60 5.96 sec

Just came across this YouTube showing the 991s doing 0-60 in 5.96 sec with 2 passengers.


I wonder if the 991s times could achieve 0-60 in 4.1sec with 2 people on board.

Unlike many other cars or turbos which are not greatly effected by the extra weight it seems that all the NA Porsches 0-60 is dramiltcallty effected with a passenger on board
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 06:33 AM
  #2  
hepmonk's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 51
From: Seattle
Rep Power: 17
hepmonk is infamous around these partshepmonk is infamous around these parts
More importantly, cars are slower at elevations of 1 mile above sea level.
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 06:52 AM
  #3  
cmelb's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
From: USA
Rep Power: 0
cmelb is infamous around these parts
I wonder what times you would see at sea level with a passenger on board. I know in my 997.2 4s you can feel the difference in acceleration from a full tank of petrol and 1/4 tank. And I'm 30 meters above sea level.
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 07:30 AM
  #4  
mtbscott's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 55
From: Houston, TX
Rep Power: 17
mtbscott is infamous around these partsmtbscott is infamous around these parts
It goes without saying that power to weight ratio is one of the major factors affecting standing start acceleration. So obviously adding weight to ANY car (i.e. extra passengers) will make it slower in 0-60. It may appear to you that some cars are not affected, but it might be that they are more traction limited than power/weight limited, another important factor.
All of the current/latest Audi RS cars put down some spectacular 0-60 times that seem to defy physics, mostly because of their quattro AWD systems superior traction. Same reason Panamera Turbos and 911 Turbos do the same. All of these cars have big power but proper AWD really helps too.
All this said, 0-60 times are more for bragging rights than real world use. I can count on one hand how many times I've "launched" my car from a stop since I got it.
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 08:35 AM
  #5  
aerogt3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 114
From: Stuttgart, Germany
Rep Power: 0
aerogt3 is infamous around these partsaerogt3 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by mtbscott
It goes without saying that power to weight ratio is one of the major factors affecting standing start acceleration. So obviously adding weight to ANY car (i.e. extra passengers) will make it slower in 0-60. It may appear to you that some cars are not affected, but it might be that they are more traction limited than power/weight limited, another important factor.
All of the current/latest Audi RS cars put down some spectacular 0-60 times that seem to defy physics, mostly because of their quattro AWD systems superior traction. Same reason Panamera Turbos and 911 Turbos do the same. All of these cars have big power but proper AWD really helps too.
All this said, 0-60 times are more for bragging rights than real world use. I can count on one hand how many times I've "launched" my car from a stop since I got it.
Don't forget that the manufacturer times are with the combination of options that add the least amount of weight. All the full leather, super power sport seats, etc. add weight too.
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 09:02 AM
  #6  
CarreraPete's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 505
From: Airmont Village, NY
Rep Power: 47
CarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud of
Weight, Heat, Atmospheric conditions, fuel, tire pressure, and most of all, the nut behind the wheel all come into play when chasing a number.

It's a canard to say that a F/I car has less problems with weight, as that is not the case.

As far as the Youtube video goes, it's ridiculous. You don't chase a number at high altitude in the heat with two junk-food commandos in the ****pit.

You can clearly see the car was running rich and bogged off the line during the launch.

Also be aware that "launch Control" doesn't always obtain better results than a skilled driver. Case in point: the fastest 0 to 60 time recorded to date was accomplished with a Manual Transmission: 2012 Porsche 911 Carrera S (Manual) 0-60 mph 3.7 Quarter Mile 12.1

http://www.zeroto60times.com/Porsche...mph-Times.html
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #7  
Naaranha's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 90
From: New Jersey
Rep Power: 19
Naaranha has a spectacular aura aboutNaaranha has a spectacular aura aboutNaaranha has a spectacular aura about
Pretty amazing the 2013 911 PDK C4S 0-60: 3.5 Sec!

http://www.zeroto60times.com/Porsche...mph-Times.html
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 11:50 AM
  #8  
CarreraPete's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 505
From: Airmont Village, NY
Rep Power: 47
CarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud of
Knowing how to drive the car is key

Originally Posted by Naaranha
Pretty amazing the 2013 911 PDK C4S 0-60: 3.5 Sec!

http://www.zeroto60times.com/Porsche...mph-Times.html
Yes, it is impressive. It just goes to show what these cars are capable of when driven correctly. The all-wheel drive is killer for traction, but with enough practice, similar results can be realized with the two-wheel drive model. Practice makes perfect.

Case in point: Our hero in the ZO6 community is a fellow called ranger. He subscribes to the theory that modifying the driver is more important than speed modifications.

He is seen here turning a 10.7 with a bone stock ZO6 on drag radials. The stock ZO6 normally runs high elevens. Ranger runs 11.02 on street tires.


Ranger has a web page that explains his years of research on launching and shifting techniques, which can be applied to all sport cars.
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 01:12 PM
  #9  
ChuckJ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,806
From: Dallas
Rep Power: 176
ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !ChuckJ Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by hepmonk
More importantly, cars are slower at elevations of 1 mile above sea level.
There's the key! You go for speed there. BTW is also seems the clutches are grabbing at less than 3500 like mine. It lugs down like my old 2009S.

ChuckJ
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 08:10 PM
  #10  
KonaKai's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 972
From: New York City
Rep Power: 68
KonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by CarreraPete
The all-wheel drive is killer for traction, but with enough practice, similar results can be realized with the two-wheel drive model.
Indeed. Road & Track took the 991C2S from 0-60 in 3.5 seconds as well and quarter mile in 11.8:

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-revi...-911-carrera-s
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 08:56 PM
  #11  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by CarreraPete
Yes, it is impressive. It just goes to show what these cars are capable of when driven correctly. The all-wheel drive is killer for traction, but with enough practice, similar results can be realized with the two-wheel drive model. Practice makes perfect.
...
How do the 997 Turbo S and GT2 times compare? 0-60?

Re: launching daily. Why not?
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 10:54 PM
  #12  
Fester's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,293
From: Silicon Valley, California
Rep Power: 152
Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !Fester Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
How do the 997 Turbo S and GT2 times compare? 0-60?

Re: launching daily. Why not?
It should be all in here... http://www.zeroto60times.com/Porsche...mph-Times.html
 
Old Dec 18, 2012 | 07:55 AM
  #13  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Fester
Well that link can't be right.

Because it lists:
2011 Porsche 911 Turbo S 0-60 mph 2.9 Quarter Mile 10.6
2011 Porsche 911 Turbo GT2 RS 0-60 mph 3.4 Quarter Mile 11.1

Perhaps the manufacturer should ask our internet friend, Ranger, how to launch a car.

Orrrrrrrrrr

AWD is superior on take off than a more powerful, lighter RWD car, in a straight line race.
 
Old Dec 18, 2012 | 08:55 AM
  #14  
mtbscott's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 55
From: Houston, TX
Rep Power: 17
mtbscott is infamous around these partsmtbscott is infamous around these parts
Interwebz racing.....
 
Old Dec 18, 2012 | 09:41 AM
  #15  
KonaKai's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 972
From: New York City
Rep Power: 68
KonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud ofKonaKai has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
Well that link can't be right.

Because it lists:
2011 Porsche 911 Turbo S 0-60 mph 2.9 Quarter Mile 10.6
2011 Porsche 911 Turbo GT2 RS 0-60 mph 3.4 Quarter Mile 11.1

Perhaps the manufacturer should ask our internet friend, Ranger, how to launch a car.

Orrrrrrrrrr

AWD is superior on take off than a more powerful, lighter RWD car, in a straight line race.
Once the HP gets high enough, AWD is a decided advantage in putting down the power off the line. Look at the list of streetcars that go 0-60 in under 3 clicks: GTR, Turbo, Veyron, Aventador. All 4WD.
BUT, re GT2 vs Turbo S times, it wouldn't be fair to mention another major factor at work here -- PDK!
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 PM.