Just got the Stage 2 installed (with hammer upgrade) HOLY MOTHER OF GOD
Originally posted by Gary (Fl)
I would like to see your dyno when you do it.. The stage 4 without headers is only about 580HP based on what is quoted.. That is with K24's also
I would like to see your dyno when you do it.. The stage 4 without headers is only about 580HP based on what is quoted.. That is with K24's also
If the above numbers are correct, stage II is definitely the biggest bang for the buck.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BCS996TT
[B]If stage II is at 550-560 and stage IV is at 580-600, where does Stage III fall in? 570?
That would be my question also... they can't be that close..
Maybe Steven can chime in...
[B]If stage II is at 550-560 and stage IV is at 580-600, where does Stage III fall in? 570?
That would be my question also... they can't be that close..
Maybe Steven can chime in...
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Gary (Fl)
[B]
The hammer program is supposed to dyno at 455 rwhp and 475rwtq. I believe the STage 3 is just over 500 at the wheels for both.
Lou
[B]
Originally posted by BCS996TT
If stage II is at 550-560 and stage IV is at 580-600, where does Stage III fall in? 570?
That would be my question also... they can't be that close..
Maybe Steven can chime in...
If stage II is at 550-560 and stage IV is at 580-600, where does Stage III fall in? 570?
That would be my question also... they can't be that close..
Maybe Steven can chime in...
Lou
Originally posted by Orli930
Guys,
You may want to check out my post "Dynoed my car".
I dynoed my car Wednesday night:
It Dynoed at 476 rwhp.
Thats with the standard K24's and the basic GIAC stage 4. That why I am upgrading to the STAGE 4 GT with the Garrett Turbos.
Are you sure you are putting out that much power with Stage 2 and K16?
Guys,
You may want to check out my post "Dynoed my car".
I dynoed my car Wednesday night:
It Dynoed at 476 rwhp.
Thats with the standard K24's and the basic GIAC stage 4. That why I am upgrading to the STAGE 4 GT with the Garrett Turbos.
Are you sure you are putting out that much power with Stage 2 and K16?
As I had previously mentioned in your thread, you need to double check to see if there's a baseline you can compare your numbers to from the people who own the dyno. There is absolutely no doubt that your 476rwhp is way underpowered.
You should find out what is wrong with your setup before going to the Stage 4GT. It could be a simple thing that may be wrong with your car... clogged cat, bad injector, clogged fuel filter, etc. If there is something wrong with your engine/etc, going to a 4GT ain't gonna solve anything.
Also, you may want to check with the people whom you purchased your Stage4 from. Someone else had previously dyno'd way below expected values as well. Some fine tuning was needed to wake the car back up, and now.
As I had mentioned... proof is in the dyno. If one hasn't spent time around powerful cars, than I highly doubt that they can tell the difference between 450rwhp vs. 550rwhp. It ALL feels "FAST AS HELL". Considering how much you guys are paying for your mods, it really should come with a dyno-proof or money-back guarantee.
Stephen
'01 Turbo Ti
455rwhp, 505rwtq - Dynojet
PS. Yo LSM... I never said it was your car... *my bad*...
Orlando's car is running rich because of the cat bypass and the program. The program is not allowing it to run as sharp as it can because the secondary 02s are throwing codes. It will run rich to stay safe.
Stage III should be about 560-575 at the crank and stage IV should be 600-620 at the crank. I have dynos for all of them somewhere if you search the net. I have posted every level and normally a base line to go along with it. All of the test have been done on a DJ 248C
Stage III should be about 560-575 at the crank and stage IV should be 600-620 at the crank. I have dynos for all of them somewhere if you search the net. I have posted every level and normally a base line to go along with it. All of the test have been done on a DJ 248C
OK -- I am a bone head and cannot post pix.
here are the urls --
http://hobbystage.net/porsche/media....4655611-012549
http://hobbystage.net/porsche/media....4658191-012554
http://hobbystage.net/porsche/media....4658075-012553
http://hobbystage.net/porsche/media....4658023-012552
here are the urls --
http://hobbystage.net/porsche/media....4655611-012549
http://hobbystage.net/porsche/media....4658191-012554
http://hobbystage.net/porsche/media....4658075-012553
http://hobbystage.net/porsche/media....4658023-012552
Last edited by deeroff; May 16, 2004 at 06:45 AM.
Beatiful car!!!
well I have the "Hummer" program too and is awesome. ( I have EVO D. Valves and I am waiting to go with Europipe or Fab)
My car stock was running 0.7 and some peaks of 0.8. Now with the hummer with 91 octanes was tunnin 1.1 bar. Well, I have a close gas station here in Colorado that sells 93.5 and I tryed...well I got 1.2 bar now......and I push the envelope even more, las week I put on a empty tank 3 gallons of 100 and 9 of 93.5.... app.= 95 well the car has some peacks of 1.3 bar.
Exhaust is comming soon, I am between Europipe or Fab.
Ciao!
well I have the "Hummer" program too and is awesome. ( I have EVO D. Valves and I am waiting to go with Europipe or Fab)
My car stock was running 0.7 and some peaks of 0.8. Now with the hummer with 91 octanes was tunnin 1.1 bar. Well, I have a close gas station here in Colorado that sells 93.5 and I tryed...well I got 1.2 bar now......and I push the envelope even more, las week I put on a empty tank 3 gallons of 100 and 9 of 93.5.... app.= 95 well the car has some peacks of 1.3 bar.
Exhaust is comming soon, I am between Europipe or Fab.
Ciao!
Is there a reason why it's called a "hammer" program? I hope it's not due to what your piston tops may look (hammered) like after running 1.1-1.2 on 91 after awhile.
Last edited by oak; May 17, 2004 at 03:14 AM.






