60-130 results for my EPL K16/16g kit = 7 flat
SubscribeQuote:
505awhp on a mustang dyno! Originally Posted by Seal Grey Matte
Actually, we ran it again after I got the exhaust on. It cranked out about 505 awhp on Tony's heartbreaker mustang. We never posted the graph because no one was believing us as it was.

Isn't that close to 530-540awhp on a dynojet type dyno?

Good to see great numbers... the no shift ( 4th gear) only helped a bit but that is a 16g for you 
best
markski

best
markski
Quote:
.
How that possible?Originally Posted by Tony@epl
I know the tuner pretty well....and he says upto 1.4 on this set up on 93 is fine
.
I know 9ff also ran high boost 1.4 with pump gas.....HOW???!!
Quote:

best
markski
No shift? I thought he short shifted 3rd? Is there another graph out there I don't know about?Originally Posted by MARKSKI
Good to see great numbers... the no shift ( 4th gear) only helped a bit but that is a 16g for you 
best
markski
Quote:
He does not have the Gs plotted so hard to tell for sure... but from the look of the gragh its a no shifter... otherwise the red line would flatten.... even during a shift... The Gs would drop between shifts to somewhere around 0... Originally Posted by TXGold
No shift? I thought he short shifted 3rd? Is there another graph out there I don't know about?
markski
Quote:
markski
yea, Im pretty sure this is 1shift...Originally Posted by MARKSKI
He does not have the Gs plotted so hard to tell for sure... but from the look of the gragh its a no shifter... otherwise the red line would flatten.... even during a shift... The Gs would drop between shifts to somewhere around 0... markski
Quote:
markski
Hey Markski. I remembered one shift, but I took a look at the .dbn file to confirm. There was one shift that started at 89 mph and was done at 91.7mph (.38 secs). The longitudinal g's drop from .6 to .169 at the shift. Originally Posted by MARKSKI
He does not have the Gs plotted so hard to tell for sure... but from the look of the gragh its a no shifter... otherwise the red line would flatten.... even during a shift... The Gs would drop between shifts to somewhere around 0... markski
The posted graph is plotted on a large spread of long. g values so it's a little hard to read.
Best,
Michael
That explains it... that's even more impressive.. 

Quote:
I know 9ff also ran high boost 1.4 with pump gas.....HOW???!!
Boost is not the only factor that needs to be taken into consideration while tuning. If a car is tuned with the intent of running higher boost on pump gas, ignition timing, fueling and requested load and torque all need to be mapped accordingly. The factory knock control system needs to be altered (sensitivity turned up and rpm ranges scales) so that additional safe guards can be added to the programing. Originally Posted by Shotcaller
How that possible?I know 9ff also ran high boost 1.4 with pump gas.....HOW???!!
There is no such thing as a truely "self adjusting map" this is why it is important to run a file that has been tuned for your specific octane level, boost level and in some cases environmental conditions.
We now have numerous k16/16g kits and k24/18g kits running 1.3 bar + daily.
Quote:
Correct. This is the limits of the stock fuel system, producing 610-620 crank hps.Originally Posted by rosesplus
Michael and Tony, this is a fantastic time congratulations!! It makes me question going to an 18/24 set up. Was this done without fueling or intake mods?
Congrats Michael and great job Tony! Glad to see such positive results.




