996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Vivid's 3 Inch Y Pipe

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 09:45 PM
  #16  
Racin Jason's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 226
From: LA
Rep Power: 42
Racin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant future
I have to agree that you can have an up pipe diameter that is too large.
I also wonder if doubling the intake volume would cause any noticeable increase in turbo lag.

Since the y pipe is on the pressure side of the turbo you are blowing air through the pipe not drawing air through the pipe like an intake. So a larger diameter pipe might not be that great of a benefit in terms of hp gain.

Unless you are planning on 4 digit rwhp numbers i have a hard time believing any advantage from 2.5" to 3" pipe diameter.


As an example:
My turbo hayabusa made 520+hp at 26psi with a single 2" up pipe. A competitor did a 2.5 inch up pipe with the same turbo and did not make any additional hp.

I realize that the 996 is 3 times the displacement as the busa but it also redlines at half of the rpm the bike runs.

It would be nice to see a back to back dyno
test of the 3" pipe vs. 2.5"
 
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 10:48 PM
  #17  
earl3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 823
From: Mojave, CA
Rep Power: 133
earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !
^ or even better, flow tests of the stocker vs aftermarket solutions at relevant flow rates to see what the pressure drop difference is. I agree that, in theory, this seems like pretty high hanging fruit but may be necessary on extremely high hp cars.

You can run some basic calcs here: http://www.pipeflowcalculations.com/...drop/index.htm The theoretical difference between a 2.5" and 3" pipe going around a fairly tight 90 deg bend at 700hp flow rates (I used 40lbs/min per side) is around 0.1 psi, between a 1.9" and 2.5" diameter it's around 0.4psi. Assume a couple 90s and a couple 45s for a typical y-pipe and there isn't a whole lot of total head loss with either option.

There's a reason Chris Green was able to trap 146mph with the stock y-pipe without the world imploding

...just my .02
 
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 11:00 PM
  #18  
Racin Jason's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 226
From: LA
Rep Power: 42
Racin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant future
Interesting specs Earl. It would be interesting to see the pressure drop from stock, gt2, Evo and other ic's. I think there is more to be had by going to a more efficient IC than large pipe diameters.
 
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 11:04 PM
  #19  
bad107's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,364
From: houston, TX
Rep Power: 96
bad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond repute
Doesn't Dan's dyno showing an improvement in hsp and tq of >20 prove it does help...

http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/a...5-p-87480.html

That is on a car with GT28 turbos...(not sure of the flow rate).

I imagine it wouldn't help that much on a stock k16 but i bet it would be an even greater improvement on a car with a larger throttle body and aftermarket plenum.
 
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 11:23 PM
  #20  
earl3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 823
From: Mojave, CA
Rep Power: 133
earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by bad107
Doesn't Dan's dyno showing an improvement in hsp and tq of >20 prove it does help...

http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/a...5-p-87480.html
I'd be interested to see boost & afr logs from these comparison dyno pulls (I would guess the pipe allowed boost to creep up a bit). I suggested the flowbench as an easier & more repeatable method of test since you can isolate the one component. but yeah, I'm sure it doesn't hurt.
 
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 11:45 PM
  #21  
Racin Jason's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 226
From: LA
Rep Power: 42
Racin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant futureRacin Jason has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by bad107
Doesn't Dan's dyno showing an improvement in hsp and tq of >20 prove it does help...

http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/a...5-p-87480.html

That is on a car with GT28 turbos...(not sure of the flow rate).

I imagine it wouldn't help that much on a stock k16 but i bet it would be an even greater improvement on a car with a larger throttle body and aftermarket plenum.
20hp better than stock intake piping, i wonder what the hp difference is between the 2.5" and 3"?

Whatever the hp difference the 3" definitely looks cool!!
 
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 11:54 PM
  #22  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Racin Jason
20hp better than stock intake piping, i wonder what the hp difference is between the 2.5" and 3"?

Whatever the hp difference the 3" definitely looks cool!!
Its more about getting rid of the kinks... like at the stock intercoolers which are 1.8" at the connections.... rather then 2.5" or 3." piping from the TB to the ICs.... but thats just my opinion....
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Sep 30, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #23  
unvmy996's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,481
Rep Power: 707
unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !unvmy996 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Its more about getting rid of the kinks... like at the stock intercoolers which are 1.8" at the connections.... rather then 2.5" or 3." piping from the TB to the ICs.... but thats just my opinion....
ding ding we have a winner !!! Mark hit the most important thing right on the head !!!

besides , robs car , marks own car , scotts old 996tt, put down crazy numbers with the very same diamete pipes .

hell scotts gt2 , my car and coreys put north of 700 to the wheels with these also.
 
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #24  
vividracing's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,404
From: Gilbert, AZ
Rep Power: 0
vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !
First - Thank you Richard for your review and I cannot wait to see pics. Thanks to Bad107. Thanks to Markski and others for the input.

Techs always ***** no matter the experience. In fact even my own guys ***** about something that is new to them. Nature of the beast. But everything does fit.

The fact that this is to large of diameter, FALSE. Get rid of the kinks and go straight 3inch from the intercoolers, ypipe, and throttlebody and you have just improved your power and flow. Calculations have nothing on real world testing such as the Texas Mile, Dyno, 60-130. If you have a stock K16 turbo with no flash, no exhaust, no DVs, etc, this is not the product for you. Building a car is like putting together a puzzle. You must have ALL the parts working together properly.

Here is an installed one for people to see -
 
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #25  
RCH's Avatar
RCH
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,704
Rep Power: 94
RCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really nice
I can report that the car pulls like a train, never had chance to push but did see 1.5 bar.
 
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 12:01 PM
  #26  
vividracing's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,404
From: Gilbert, AZ
Rep Power: 0
vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !
What turbos are you running.
 
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 12:08 PM
  #27  
RCH's Avatar
RCH
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,704
Rep Power: 94
RCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really nice
Billet K16's
 
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #28  
vividracing's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,404
From: Gilbert, AZ
Rep Power: 0
vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !
What octane are you running?
 
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #29  
RCH's Avatar
RCH
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,704
Rep Power: 94
RCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really nice
98, nothing is going to blow
 
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 12:17 PM
  #30  
RCH's Avatar
RCH
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,704
Rep Power: 94
RCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really niceRCH is just really nice
apart from the Billet K16's
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:30 PM.