996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

K24 turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #61  
Old 10-19-2012, 11:08 AM
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ga
Posts: 8,934
Rep Power: 550
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
I agree. Plus K24's are pretty flaky turbos anyway and with so much more to be gained with the simple (K24/18g or 20g) to the exoctic Alpha 28's turbo swap. Just do the turbo swap and get less lag and way more power. IMHO
What is flaky about them?
 
  #62  
Old 10-19-2012, 11:15 AM
WOODTSTER's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MPLS, MN USA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
Rep Power: 464
WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by heavychevy
What is flaky about them?
Hey Dez,

That is acutally words right out of Todd Knighton's mouth back when I was looking to replace my K16's. They just do not do anything particularily well and their spooling was referred to as "Flaky" by Todd.
So many fantastic turbos out there now that it seems like K24's is an odd choice.

cheers,

Marty
 
  #63  
Old 10-19-2012, 12:06 PM
Mark @ AIM Performance's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.Plainfield, NJ
Posts: 6,589
Rep Power: 853
Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !
I dont agree with a lot of tuner hp consipracy junk being thrown around in this thread, even though there are bogus tuner dynos floating around mainly from dyno dynamics and mustang dynoes since they are teh easiest to rig. plain jane K24s with exhaust and proper 1-1.1 bar tune have no problem making 500whp. Nicely running K24 cars have trapped 125-127mph which perfectly corresponds to the 500whp mark. i trapped 125.5mph on my K24s with just tune, exhaust, and 5bar fpr.

On dynojet that we use:
- Stock K16 996tt makes 360whp rwd
- Tune, Exhaust, intercoolers K16 car makes 430whp
- tune, exhuast, k24 996tt make 500-515whp
- Stock C6 Z06 makes 420whp for comparison
 
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
  #64  
Old 10-19-2012, 12:23 PM
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ga
Posts: 8,934
Rep Power: 550
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
Hey Dez,

That is acutally words right out of Todd Knighton's mouth back when I was looking to replace my K16's. They just do not do anything particularily well and their spooling was referred to as "Flaky" by Todd.
So many fantastic turbos out there now that it seems like K24's is an odd choice.

cheers,

Marty
I haven't had the chance to really drive anything extensively other than maybe Al Norton's old GT28's (I think that's what they were) and those had a good bit of lag to them. Rode in some 18g cars and they certainly don't spool faster. You can get decent 60-130, trap speed or mile power with some 18g, 20g type turbos, but those are not good for the track. Many of the fast road racing Turbo's or GT2's have been K24's (Topspeed, One Lap Davia, One Lap Stewart) have been K24's. That is no coincidence.

My hangup has been losing spool going to a hybrid K24 or having too much torque (driveability and rods) from some of the billet 16's out there. Ultimately I think the A28 would be ideal. I just don't trust any tuners in my area.
 
  #65  
Old 10-19-2012, 12:40 PM
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 6,453
Rep Power: 437
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by heavychevy
I haven't had the chance to really drive anything extensively other than maybe Al Norton's old GT28's (I think that's what they were) and those had a good bit of lag to them. Rode in some 18g cars and they certainly don't spool faster. You can get decent 60-130, trap speed or mile power with some 18g, 20g type turbos, but those are not good for the track. Many of the fast road racing Turbo's or GT2's have been K24's (Topspeed, One Lap Davia, One Lap Stewart) have been K24's. That is no coincidence.

My hangup has been losing spool going to a hybrid K24 or having too much torque (driveability and rods) from some of the billet 16's out there. Ultimately I think the A28 would be ideal. I just don't trust any tuners in my area.

I agree with this for the most part, but the TUNE plays a small part with spool. When I first started building my car, I rode in, drove, and roll raced a GT28 car. My car was faster in every way, including spool. To add to that, when I added Meth, I lost a little spool. All about heat in the turbine housing...
 
  #66  
Old 10-19-2012, 01:12 PM
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 3,636
Rep Power: 254
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
Hey Dez,

That is acutally words right out of Todd Knighton's mouth back when I was looking to replace my K16's. They just do not do anything particularily well and their spooling was referred to as "Flaky" by Todd.
So many fantastic turbos out there now that it seems like K24's is an odd choice.

cheers,

Marty
Hi,When I was down by Todd last year getting my car retuned by him,he said he liked the K24 turbos because there were alot of options for them and they were easy to work with to make power..
 
  #67  
Old 10-25-2012, 06:23 PM
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 1,215
Rep Power: 116
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
I have a 16g car. Exhaust, headers, Y pipe, injectors, Markski intercooler
and tune. Actually spent a week with Markski in Chicago and he had to
fix the previous work performed on the car lol! He bench tuned and
massaged the car into a street monster. Mark and his mechanic said
the car felt more like a 3071 then a K16. He also said no one would
believe it's a 16 car when I post numbers. Btw, he converted the car
to rwd. I had the car dynoed on the dream killer and it posted 493 hp
and 523 ft. lb tq 1.2 bar. At 1.4 bar it put down 535 hp and 593 tq. No V box
yet but it's definitely low 6's 60-130 and 0-100 is low 6's. Real world
proof is I smoked a Z06 with heads, throttle body tune and exhaust.
We're not talking car lengths, I mean I left him setting still. God bless
the Polish Porsche genius in Chicago.
 
  #68  
Old 10-25-2012, 07:28 PM
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ga
Posts: 8,934
Rep Power: 550
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Those are some good numbers.
 
  #69  
Old 10-25-2012, 08:09 PM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHICAGO
Age: 55
Posts: 9,720
Rep Power: 601
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Those numbers are on a mustang dyno. He did previously a dunojet and that was 570whp. Told him to go back now after the car is finally fixed.
 
  #70  
Old 10-25-2012, 08:27 PM
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 3,636
Rep Power: 254
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
[QUOTE=MARKSKI@911tuning;3675152]Those numbers are on a mustang dyno. He did previously a dunojet and that was 570whp. Told him to go back now after the car is finally fixed.[/QUOTE)
That's great numbers for those turbo's, good job.
 
  #71  
Old 10-25-2012, 10:49 PM
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ga
Posts: 8,934
Rep Power: 550
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Race gas?
 
  #72  
Old 10-26-2012, 02:09 AM
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 1,215
Rep Power: 116
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
[quote=johnspeed;3675174]
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Those numbers are on a mustang dyno. He did previously a dunojet and that was 570whp. Told him to go back now after the car is finally fixed.[/QUOTE)
That's great numbers for those turbo's, good job.
Thanks John. The car is significantly faster now at 1.2 bar than it was at
1.4 pre Markski and as Mark said, the car put down 570 on a dynojet.
570 with boost/ vacuum leaks, fouled plugs, flattened headers and a
half dozen other problems lol. I'm bettin it hits 620 on the same dyno
now. I think those mustang's dyno a tad low.
 
  #73  
Old 10-26-2012, 02:23 AM
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 1,215
Rep Power: 116
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by heavychevy
Race gas?
Yep, 100 octane for 1.4 and 93 pump for 1.2. Btw, I read some of your
post making reference to Barber. Are you local? If so, you must know
David from Speedsouth. I think he has the record at Barber. I had the
car dynoed on his mustang at Speedsouth. He butt-dynoed the car at
630 to the wheels!!! He was shocked to see 535 but he maintained
that the 600 tq rw and the power across the band accounted for the
otherworldly acceleration! This guy builds 1000 hp street machines
and zr1 race cars on a daily basis and he said this is the fastest street
legal car he'd driven in. I assured him there are some fellows out there
with 996's that would leave me in the dust. He had a hard time believing
that.
 

Last edited by layinback; 10-26-2012 at 02:43 AM. Reason: misspelled word
  #74  
Old 10-26-2012, 02:38 AM
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 1,215
Rep Power: 116
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Those numbers are on a mustang dyno. He did previously a dunojet and that was 570whp. Told him to go back now after the car is finally fixed.
I'll be heading up to Huntsville next week for a repeat dyno on the
dynojet. Once I bag the 60-130 record for a k16 based car I'll be looking
for a 997 GT2 and you'll be getting a call. I read where some guys are
worried about the GT2's lack of safety and all the hoopla about the moniker
"widow maker." Obviously they've never driven a 2700 lb/ 500 hp 930 lol.
 
  #75  
Old 10-26-2012, 04:27 AM
32krazy!'s Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: tn
Age: 62
Posts: 5,551
Rep Power: 626
32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !
let me know when your heading to huntsville. i live about 2 hrs away and would love to see your car on the dyno. are you rwd now?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: K24 turbos



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM.