It's the CHIT talking thread.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 829
From: Fargo, ND
Rep Power: 76
Not saying street racing is a good thing but when there is only 1 drag strip and no road courses in the state, that's what people do.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,236
From: NY
Rep Power: 110
The sticker is an inside joke within my group of friends who have lambos........see now pulling stuff from someones life and posting it on a public forum is doing what?
Also the stock motor comment was to mess with Mark and majority I wrote about my car in this thread is BS, thats kind of the way things work on the streets, you down play "stuff", and both Mark and I spoke off the forum and nipped this whole thing in the butt.
......noted to the admin.......
Also the stock motor comment was to mess with Mark and majority I wrote about my car in this thread is BS, thats kind of the way things work on the streets, you down play "stuff", and both Mark and I spoke off the forum and nipped this whole thing in the butt.
......noted to the admin.......
Last edited by Wealth Manager; Jan 8, 2016 at 06:33 PM.
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 15,090
From: California
Rep Power: 1002
As long as you guys were just having fun this thread was left to run...but now some of you are using it to harm or personally attack others...knock that chit off or this thread will be closed
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,321
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 134
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 456
Rep Power: 71
I'm actually sensitive to chit being deleted altogether - I got upset when the 'Upgraded IC ducts" thread dissapeared because the guy contacted to manufacture them wasn't a sponsor and posted a couple of times, but here... As far as I am concerned, delete it. Make it go away. No qualms from my side.
Last edited by stevemfr; Jan 9, 2016 at 01:00 PM.
Banned
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,551
From: tn
Rep Power: 628
Thank you Chuck!!!
I'm actually sensitive to chit being deleted altogether - I got upset when the 'Upgraded IC ducts" thread dissapeared because the guy contacted to manufacture them wasn't a sponsor and posted a couple of times, but here... As far as I am concerned, delete it. Make it go away. No qualms from my side.
I'm actually sensitive to chit being deleted altogether - I got upset when the 'Upgraded IC ducts" thread dissapeared because the guy contacted to manufacture them wasn't a sponsor and posted a couple of times, but here... As far as I am concerned, delete it. Make it go away. No qualms from my side.
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
whatever happened to the concept of.. "if one doesn't like something in "print"? then one isn't/wasn't/cannot be?! forced/coerced or otherwise somehow pressured into having it enter even into ones sphere of conscious thought? i can see it now! "wait! i read that, you allowed the subversive thought to enter my head!" where's my attorney! civil action! coming right up! subsequent lawsuit and claim for damages taken on spec!, but of course LOL
if i understand the core concept of bylines and web based "editorial" whether "sanctioned" or open to contribution to and from the general public? and taking into very real account the very real legal "TOS" and concurrent responsibilities that go along with that, commercial sites have to abide by and members through participation either tacitly or even by signing up tacitly adhere to?? ( or "should"!? though i'm certain that some would question that claim that I by way of example do? vigorously adhere to same?! ) but i suppose what i'm asking is, no one here has come to harm! or have they??!, or had their personal reputation questioned ( or. again.., have they!? ) so why do we need MORE occurrence of censorship if the thread is itself entitled "chit taking" etc etc" or whatever it called? i mean it's title alone spells it all out! no?
i just dont get the infringement upon written "speech" that causes no genuine or definitive harm to an individual!? because this is all just that! chit talk! what can possibly be the harm in that? has anyone's reputation been impugned?? beyond repair? have "aspersions been cast??" that can/can't be proven and arguments/conversations that revolve around that very truth? come anywhere near "defamatory and malignant" or serious harm to ones reputation to the degree that "it" threatened their livelihood, and given them the right to seek compensatory damage(s) for said defamatory comments? i think not!
so, what IS the fuss about? is "chit talking" now also in jeopardy and soon to fall the way of something as seemingly inoccuous as wishing someone "merry christmas"? rather than the less offensive to some?! the more generic "happy holidays" is not ok? GOD forbid we should offend someone who wishes to celebrate the incorrect date of a religious and famous persons birthdate with "presents" and candles, and ceremonies, galore?
i mean, why don't we just outlaw "speech" that has not be run past "standards and practices" to ensure NO group or individual might potentially be "offended"! there, that should do it.
sheesh, but i do enjoy my typing practice. in the immortal words of an old favorite rock group; SUPERTRAMP: "better watch what ya "say"? they'll be calling you a radical, criminal, oh intellectual".
lol "and the beat goes on?" - sonny and cher LOL
/rant off lol.
if i understand the core concept of bylines and web based "editorial" whether "sanctioned" or open to contribution to and from the general public? and taking into very real account the very real legal "TOS" and concurrent responsibilities that go along with that, commercial sites have to abide by and members through participation either tacitly or even by signing up tacitly adhere to?? ( or "should"!? though i'm certain that some would question that claim that I by way of example do? vigorously adhere to same?! ) but i suppose what i'm asking is, no one here has come to harm! or have they??!, or had their personal reputation questioned ( or. again.., have they!? ) so why do we need MORE occurrence of censorship if the thread is itself entitled "chit taking" etc etc" or whatever it called? i mean it's title alone spells it all out! no?
i just dont get the infringement upon written "speech" that causes no genuine or definitive harm to an individual!? because this is all just that! chit talk! what can possibly be the harm in that? has anyone's reputation been impugned?? beyond repair? have "aspersions been cast??" that can/can't be proven and arguments/conversations that revolve around that very truth? come anywhere near "defamatory and malignant" or serious harm to ones reputation to the degree that "it" threatened their livelihood, and given them the right to seek compensatory damage(s) for said defamatory comments? i think not!
so, what IS the fuss about? is "chit talking" now also in jeopardy and soon to fall the way of something as seemingly inoccuous as wishing someone "merry christmas"? rather than the less offensive to some?! the more generic "happy holidays" is not ok? GOD forbid we should offend someone who wishes to celebrate the incorrect date of a religious and famous persons birthdate with "presents" and candles, and ceremonies, galore?
i mean, why don't we just outlaw "speech" that has not be run past "standards and practices" to ensure NO group or individual might potentially be "offended"! there, that should do it.
sheesh, but i do enjoy my typing practice. in the immortal words of an old favorite rock group; SUPERTRAMP: "better watch what ya "say"? they'll be calling you a radical, criminal, oh intellectual".
lol "and the beat goes on?" - sonny and cher LOL
/rant off lol.
Last edited by '02996ttx50; Jan 9, 2016 at 02:16 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,077
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 174
