6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource

6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/)
-   996 Turbo / GT2 (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/996-turbo-gt2-2/)
-   -   Dyno - SRM K24's (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/996-turbo-gt2/432343-dyno-srm-k24s.html)

Sourcerock Jun 27, 2019 06:49 PM

Dyno - SRM K24's
 
I posted a thread back in Sep 2016 with the following chart (stock K16's, 3" catless, UMW tune, 91 octane, RWD).


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.6sp...fb488796d1.jpg




Since then (2018) installed SRM K24's, Injectors, GT2RS I/C's, Marski mafless tune, filters on turbo's. The mafless tune has run flawless for a year.

Finally got around to getting it Dyno'd this week.

Same: shop, dyno, operator, 91 pump gas & RWD. Here are the results :

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.6sp...e92bd088cd.jpg

More on the red run vs. green run later.


I asked the operator for a overlay from my baseline . . . still waiting . . . quicker to draw it on the new graph.


https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.6sp...54399da2e6.jpghttps://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.6sp...d671dcb8bc.jpg

Green run was with Super 10 mufflers on the UW 3" catless.

I removed the mufflers for the red run and slipped on the original end pipes (resulting in the standard UW 3" SS catless).

I was surprised the Super 10's back pressure helped a little up to 4250 rpm and only cost 10-15 hp above 5250 rpm.

The super 10's quiet down the car noticeably, huge difference at cold start-up.

Ignore the electric cut-outs, the cold start-up is very reasonable, so I removed them.





Sveina Jun 28, 2019 10:20 AM

At what boost levels are the different runs?

Sourcerock Jun 28, 2019 01:16 PM

All runs are at 1.2 bar.

brnrdtns Jun 29, 2019 09:22 AM

Those are solid numbers for 91 octane.

TheDeckMan Aug 14, 2019 09:07 AM

That is a nice hike in power!

Sourcerock Aug 14, 2019 02:11 PM

Anyone have any thoughts about how safe my stock rods are with this set-up ?

JSBear Aug 15, 2019 12:34 PM

If the torque curve was shifted 5-600 rpm or more to the left, I would be more concerned. The SRM turbos seem to spool faster than my K24-18g's, I would prefer that power curve over what I have now.

rennteche55 Aug 15, 2019 11:29 PM

Seems like a lot of extra mods for only 30rwhp? Or is it the change to the curve that’s what matters more so than peak power?!

brnrdtns Aug 16, 2019 10:31 AM


Originally Posted by rennteche55 (Post 4796128)
Seems like a lot of extra mods for only 30rwhp? Or is it the change to the curve that’s what matters more so than peak power?!

450 to 580 hp.

Sourcerock Aug 16, 2019 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by rennteche55 (Post 4796128)
Seems like a lot of extra mods for only 30rwhp? Or is it the change to the curve that’s what matters more so than peak power?!

HP went from 453 ((K16's) to 580 (SRM's)
TQ went from 550 (K16's) to 590 (SRM's)


Huge improvement. Hoping the rods are not over-stressed with the way the power comes on.

brnrdtns Aug 16, 2019 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by Sourcerock (Post 4796193)
HP went from 453 ((K16's) to 580 (SRM's)
TQ went from 550 (K16's) to 590 (SRM's)


Huge improvement. Hoping the rods are not over-stressed with the way the power comes on.

Don't mash it at low rpm, like when trying to pass someone. Hard to do though because it is fun to feel that boost come on from low rpm.

Sourcerock Aug 16, 2019 03:20 PM


Originally Posted by brnrdtns (Post 4796210)
Don't mash it at low rpm, like when trying to pass someone. Hard to do though because it is fun to feel that boost come on from low rpm.

The Torque curve has shifted 750 rpm to the right. It used to make 550 WTQ @ 3500 rpm -> it now it needs 4250 to make 550 WTQ.

At 4250 the bigger turbos are working, the SRM's make 100 WTQ from 4500 -7000 over the K16's

If I mash the gas at a low rpm, in a big gear, the turbos don't spool as hard as the K16's below 4250. You would think there would be less cylinder pressure with the SRM's below 4250 and therefore lower chance of bending rods.

What am I missing ?

brnrdtns Aug 16, 2019 04:10 PM


Originally Posted by Sourcerock (Post 4796277)
The Torque curve has shifted 750 rpm to the right. It used to make 550 WTQ @ 3500 rpm -> it now it needs 4250 to make 550 WTQ.

At 4250 the bigger turbos are working, the SRM's make 100 WTQ from 4500 -7000 over the K16's

If I mash the gas at a low rpm, in a big gear, the turbos don't spool as hard as the K16's below 4250. You would think there would be less cylinder pressure with the SRM's below 4250 and therefore lower chance of bending rods.

What am I missing ?

Could be true. You're probably in good shape. I'm just saying that is where you want to be a little more cautious.

rennteche55 Aug 16, 2019 08:43 PM


Originally Posted by Sourcerock (Post 4796193)
HP went from 453 ((K16's) to 580 (SRM's)
TQ went from 550 (K16's) to 590 (SRM's)


Huge improvement. Hoping the rods are not over-stressed with the way the power comes on.


Ahh my bad , couldn’t zoom in far enough on my phone screen. Can post up some pics of what air filter setup you’re running? I know it’s maff less just wonder what you went with.

Sourcerock Aug 17, 2019 10:29 AM


Originally Posted by JSBear (Post 4796004)
If the torque curve was shifted 5-600 rpm or more to the left, I would be more concerned. The SRM turbos seem to spool faster than my K24-18g's, I would prefer that power curve over what I have now.

Do you have filters on your turbos or the stock intake system?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands