A host of changes
Thanks guys. I like this car more everyday. And that's not like me at all. Roving eyes and all...
Just drove some 30 miles on the freeway. All I have to say is, if you have Pss9s, you should definitely try it 1" higher. It makes a world of difference in absorption and ride. This is the way it SHOULD be.
Just drove some 30 miles on the freeway. All I have to say is, if you have Pss9s, you should definitely try it 1" higher. It makes a world of difference in absorption and ride. This is the way it SHOULD be.
Originally Posted by ari
if you have Pss9s, you should definitely try it 1" higher. It makes a world of difference in absorption and ride. This is the way it SHOULD be.
Not directed at you Ari, but just a thought on the intake:
Putting the waffle back in may solve maf issues but will also reduce the hp gain.....Why not go with the stock box and a K&N then?
Originally Posted by Shark01
Doesn't that defeat the purpose of having them? How does that improve handling?
Not directed at you Ari, but just a thought on the intake:
Putting the waffle back in may solve MAF issues but will also reduce the hp gain.....Why not go with the stock box and a K&N then?
Not directed at you Ari, but just a thought on the intake:
Putting the waffle back in may solve MAF issues but will also reduce the hp gain.....Why not go with the stock box and a K&N then?
My understanding is that waffle does impose a meaningful restriction and power output is supposed to be the same. I felt the V-Flow had better power when I installed it last year. The waffle didn't hurt butt-dyno performance.
I posted this in July 06: https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...highlight=comb
Last edited by Turbo Fanatic; Feb 5, 2007 at 11:27 AM.
Originally Posted by wross996TT
Nice pics ARI...great combo interior. So more evidence it is not the MAF, but the air flow (turbulence)?
This added restriction just reduces the effectiveness of the filter setup. Of course a MAF that handles more flow is the answer.
My hypothesis is that the "turbulence" causes uneven airflow over the MAF causing temperature spikes in the filament that it was not engineered to withstand.
I doubt the waffle causes an airflow restriction. After all, RUF has up to 590 kits with a stock airbox and EVO recommends the MAF fix for up the GT700s.
It is even possible that the car will run better A/F ratios with the waffle in place due to even airflow detection. That may make more power than a car that is a little lean, then a little rich, etc...
I will dyno my car again and post results. The dyno facility is near my office, so I can do it on whim...
I doubt the waffle causes an airflow restriction. After all, RUF has up to 590 kits with a stock airbox and EVO recommends the MAF fix for up the GT700s.
It is even possible that the car will run better A/F ratios with the waffle in place due to even airflow detection. That may make more power than a car that is a little lean, then a little rich, etc...
I will dyno my car again and post results. The dyno facility is near my office, so I can do it on whim...
Last edited by Turbo Fanatic; Feb 5, 2007 at 11:34 AM.




. Kevin

