996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

10.11 sec.@ 142.46 mph(getting closer)

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 06:56 PM
  #136  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Im not in any 1/4 class... Im just trying to get in the 9s LOL
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Mar 14, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #137  
dgussin1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,129
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Rep Power: 68
dgussin1 is infamous around these parts
congrats on the fast pass...9's should't be too difficult with a decent 60'.
 
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #138  
MrBlonde's Avatar
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 611
From: Sydney, Australia
Rep Power: 0
MrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to all
Originally Posted by onelove
Using wheel speed sensors, there are ways to control the launch without using "traction control" aka individual wheel speed sensors. One example would be a driveshaft speed sensor with a slip comparison against engien RPM.
Nope, you are permitted data logging equipment but it is prohibited for any electronics to alter the performance. That means no traction control of any kind no matter how you package it.

The Top Fuellers log driveshaft speed vs wheel speed vs RPMs etc and use it after each pass to adjust lockup and trim etc .. but not in flight if you know what I mean.
 
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #139  
MrBlonde's Avatar
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 611
From: Sydney, Australia
Rep Power: 0
MrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to all
Originally Posted by Tito
I was not aware that Mr.MARKSKI was running in the NHRA, if that is the case I can ONLY assume that it will be in the NHRA Sport Compact, I also can only assume that it will be in the Sport Rear Wheel Drive Class, assuming that is the case at 3500 pnds minimum weight for a 6 cyl, I see the entire project a big task even with 900hp.

Same reason we dont run that class anymore...........
NHRA Sport Compact has a capacity limit of 3.5 litres anyway. Porsche 911s can't play!
 
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 10:33 PM
  #140  
Tito's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 576
Rep Power: 58
Tito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud ofTito has much to be proud of
NHRA Sport Compact has a capacity limit of 3.5 litres anyway. Porsche 911s can't play!

For Pro RWD the max is 3.5L we are not talking about a Pro class, we were talking about Sport Rear Wheel Drive, actually we are taking about helping the fellow go 9s. and by the way launch control and traction control are two different animals.

Launch Control

Fully flexible first gear launch capability.
Extensively tunable to individual vehicles.

Traction Control
Fully adjustable from the dashboard.
Measured from all 4 wheels
 
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:14 PM
  #141  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Im not going to do any NHRA stuff LOl just having some fun.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #142  
joetwint's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,566
From: new york
Rep Power: 604
joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
Im not going to do any NHRA stuff LOl just having some fun.
You mean alot of fun ........in a very short time!
 
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:20 PM
  #143  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by joetwint
You mean alot of fun ........in a very short time!

yes in 10 seconds or less
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:25 PM
  #144  
onelove's Avatar
Former Vendor
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,023
From: Orlando, FL
Rep Power: 0
onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MrBlonde
Nope, you are permitted data logging equipment but it is prohibited for any electronics to alter the performance. That means no traction control of any kind no matter how you package it.

The Top Fuellers log driveshaft speed vs wheel speed vs RPMs etc and use it after each pass to adjust lockup and trim etc .. but not in flight if you know what I mean.
Correct, they (top fuel) also run timers that alter the run throughout. Quite funny when they first started using the rev limiters to limit top end speed. They mandated a rev-limiter, but didn't say you couldn't put it on a timer Needless to say after a certain top fuel team elapsed the national speed record on a rev limiter, they started watching out for that too.

NHRA SC rules differ quite a bit from NHRA's rules as well, they are under the same umbrella, but there is a lot more team input and they're changing all the time. Also on a boosted car with a boost controller and wastegate, you're already modifying the engines performance during the run, it doesn't say anything about adding another variable to this correction table. Back on topic
 

Last edited by onelove; Mar 14, 2007 at 11:28 PM.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:26 PM
  #145  
joetwint's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,566
From: new york
Rep Power: 604
joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
yes in 10 seconds or less
Now your talkin.
 
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 12:25 AM
  #146  
MrBlonde's Avatar
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 611
From: Sydney, Australia
Rep Power: 0
MrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to allMrBlonde is a name known to all
Originally Posted by Tito
NHRA Sport Compact has a capacity limit of 3.5 litres anyway. Porsche 911s can't play!

For Pro RWD the max is 3.5L we are not talking about a Pro class, we were talking about Sport Rear Wheel Drive, actually we are taking about helping the fellow go 9s. and by the way launch control and traction control are two different animals.

Launch Control

Fully flexible first gear launch capability.
Extensively tunable to individual vehicles.

Traction Control
Fully adjustable from the dashboard.
Measured from all 4 wheels
I don't agree, launch control is just a specific example of traction control.
But as other have said the Sport Comapct world is encroaching on the electronics bans .. might be inevitable.

My understanding is that the 3.5 litre capacity limit is for all Sport Compact classes?

However for the purposes of getting a good number, I guess any and all aids are acceptable.
 
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 01:57 AM
  #147  
mclaren55's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 214
From: Markham, Ontario
Rep Power: 30
mclaren55 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by MrBlonde
NHRA Sport Compact has a capacity limit of 3.5 litres anyway. Porsche 911s can't play!
Sure they can, just not 993, 996, or 997's.
 
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 02:32 AM
  #148  
VRAlexander
Guest
Posts: n/a
Congrats on the run bro! Since we are 'skinning the same cat' with different approaches, I know your car should run a 9.6X with AT LEAST a 147MPH trap! It will come....
 

Last edited by VRAlexander; Mar 15, 2007 at 02:55 AM.
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 03:15 AM
  #149  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
ALex,
glad that ur in one piece after doing a cross country run in a truck LOL

I think a 9.7 with a 146 mph is doable... if we get a 1.5 60 ft. run full boost I think it will hit it. the 10.1 run was at 1.32 bars.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Mar 15, 2007 | 10:02 AM
  #150  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Guys,

I just reviewed the rulebook for the Sport Compact Class, and it says nothing about the Sport RWD class being restricted to 3.5L. It actually gives no maximum displacement limits at all for that class. Only that the engines must be 4-cyl, 6-cyl, or 2-rotor rotary.

Now, under the "Pro RWD" and "modified" classes, there are a maximum 3.5L displacement sizes listed for 6-cylinders, but those are totally seperate classes than Sport RWD.

Thread-jack complete.
 

Last edited by Divexxtreme; Mar 15, 2007 at 11:20 AM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 AM.