GT2 vs. 770RWHP Ford GT pt. II(video)
Originally Posted by houstonT
Hope you aren't referring to me as there was no doubting, rather a stating of the facts based on the video posted. As a matter of fact, if you look at this video that is posted (part II):
Race 1: the Porsche starts out a full car length out on the GT and therefore it's hard to tell (based on the GT's engine note) if the Porsche jumped or not, nevertheless, good race... It seems like the GT pulled on the top end...
Race 2: seems like a much more fair start but again it seems unreal that the GT is in it or that he fully knows how to race that car. In any event, in this race, it's clear that the Porsche won.
Just my 0.02 and observations based on the facts. Wish you were closer as I'd like to run you in my Supra!
Peter
Race 1: the Porsche starts out a full car length out on the GT and therefore it's hard to tell (based on the GT's engine note) if the Porsche jumped or not, nevertheless, good race... It seems like the GT pulled on the top end...
Race 2: seems like a much more fair start but again it seems unreal that the GT is in it or that he fully knows how to race that car. In any event, in this race, it's clear that the Porsche won.
Just my 0.02 and observations based on the facts. Wish you were closer as I'd like to run you in my Supra!
Peter
The is obviously a drivers race, a roll on race on the highway is always going to favor one of the cars gearing at the start, and inb this case the starting speed favors the Turbo, if the GT could be in a lower gear then maybe something would change and it could keep up on the start but as far as pulling they looked pretty even to me other than the mis shift.
Originally Posted by houstonT
In any event, I am VERY seriously thinking about making next year's TX2K8 Supra Nationals more of a joint effort b/w the Supra community and the 6speed community. ALL cars invited but it would be great to have a strong Supra and P-Car showing. Of course ALL OTHER CARS invited too! I guess the first thing I need to do is talk to someone here that could put me in contact with some of the forum sponsors. Can you tell me who "runs and administers" this board?
Thanks,
Peter
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ht=6speed+meet
Originally Posted by iLLM3
I dont know man, weird concept.. But in my old turbo i would instantly pull ahead of any Viper i raced, NA with nitrous/friend's Supercharged viper and so on, now even more so when i whooped a Ford GT on the highway last night in the RUF, throttle response is 30% better in this car and spool time.. I guess it's just having it in the right gear at the right MPH!
Originally Posted by dgussin1
Have you ever driven a positive displacement supercharged car? There is NO delay in throttle response, even at 2000 RPM.
In fact when I race my 775 RWHP Vette, it's vey hard to keep the launch even because I have rear mounted Turbos on it and very low compresion so it has some lag, but my turbo doesnt have much of that at all. I havent driven a FGT or Twin Screw if that's what positive displacement means but you have to drive both to eliminate the possibility of the Turbo getting to powerbad first.
Originally Posted by heavychevy
What does positively displaced mean?
Some like to think of the centrifugal supercharger and the turbocharger as the same thing except with the compressor wheel turned by different means. The centrifugal does experience lag at the lower end also. [also see the Centrifugal Superchargers page]
Or you could have split it between compressors and (positive displacement) non-compressors.
3. Of the two types of supercharger the second, commonly called a Roots blower, is a positive displacement air pump driven directly from the crank, injecting air it has NOT compressed. It delivers linearly increasing boost as rpm increases.
The great difference of the roots type blower is that it produces high boost at low end rpm, with no significant lag. [also see our Roots Superchargers page]
But now you have to split it between NON-positive displacement compressors, positive displacement NON-compressors, and the twin screw positive displacement compressor.
4. The twin-screw supercharger is a positive displacement air pump driven directly from the crank, injecting air it has ALREADY compressed. It delivers linearly increasing boost as rpm increases. The twin screw delivers full boost at low rpm, like the Roots, but also delivers compressed air, like the centrifugal and the turbo.
[also see our Twin Screw Superchargers page]
BTW, it's impossible for a turbo to get to it's powerband first, a PD blower is always in it's power band.
here is the dyno sheet from my gt500 and a twin screw gt500...notice that the second the car is spun on the dyno at 2000rpm, it's making 500+ ft lbs of torque, meaning it's always in it's power band.
Last edited by dgussin1; Jul 2, 2007 at 03:49 PM.
Joes car should be able to hang with him. Speaking from experience had one till about 100 -120 very strong but NOT A ROLL ON CAR!!! I have had my *** handed to me by alike toys it doesn't have the up stairs even with the blower! I had a kenne bell on mine dyno'ed about 760 whp. When I had my car in one piece Supra's, vipers and other alike things from 60-80 mph I would hang with if not pull away. All of them had atleast 100 whp more!! Where I would get into trouble was 6th not enough steam
Originally Posted by DMK
J60-80 mph I would hang with if not pull away. All of them had atleast 100 whp more!! Where I would get into trouble was 6th not enough steam

__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
I might be in for that. Can we see the Cowboys play too?
Originally Posted by LUISGT3
Sounds great Peter. PM Jeff (The Punisher) and he should be able to help you out with that. We had a 6speed meet in Vegas and although many of us drove our cars there, unfortunately, there were no car events (Just social/gambling/drinking which was fun as well). There is a thread here where we are discussing having it possibly in Dallas next year and have some real car events as well.
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ht=6speed+meet
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ht=6speed+meet
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
thats becasue the gt28s hybrids just dont have it up there... a little too small for those Supras....
Cheers, Robert
Originally Posted by ari
I might be in for that. Can we see the Cowboys play too?
Sincerely Robert
Originally Posted by robmd99
Yes, when I had my GT700 it ran out of steam at 4800 when being dynoed. But from a standstill to 4800 it felt like a big block chevy!!! I think this setup is preferable for most because of the lack of lag; however, when doing street racing you just start loosing acceleration around 110 to 120... which means you will loose.
Cheers, Robert
Cheers, Robert
I didn't "loose"...I think you meant to say lose.
Originally Posted by robmd99
Yes, when I had my GT700 it ran out of steam at 4800 when being dynoed.
Cheers, Robert
Cheers, Robert

How do you figure that the power "falls off" after 4800? That's when the HP takes over from the torque.
Don't turn this thread into an EVOMS/GT700 bash fest.
Originally Posted by RennTechV12
Watch the video again. We went to 150.
I didn't "loose"...I think you meant to say lose.
I didn't "loose"...I think you meant to say lose.
Fraternally, Robert
Originally Posted by robmd99
I was not referring to your car or your race but in general terms about the GT 700 Kit which utilizes GT28/60. This is a great kit; however, in Texas we have some really fast cars that just outpaced my GT 700. It seemed like my acceration would fall off slightly when compared to some highly tune small blocks or supras. If I did not enjoy street racing, I would not have changed my EVOMS GT 700 kit. I hope this clarifies my statement, additionaly that is a great video!
Fraternally, Robert
Fraternally, Robert





