996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Please stop opening threads 4 years old

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 07:58 PM
  #1  
wross996TT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,660
Rep Power: 254
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Please stop opening threads 4 years old

I don't know what is going on, but it seems there are a rash of threads being reopened from 3+ years ago. If you want to read them for their content great (no need to post on them). If you have a new question great, open a new thread. Perhaps it is just me that finds this annoying
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 08:02 PM
  #2  
joetwint's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,566
From: new york
Rep Power: 604
joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !joetwint Is a GOD !
Not just you........its driving me crazy.
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #3  
porschenut911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,696
From: Chitown, IL
Rep Power: 87
porschenut911 is infamous around these parts
Me too, open new threads.
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 08:10 PM
  #4  
LUISGT3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,073
From: Minneapolis, Mn
Rep Power: 1071
LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !
It has been really bad the last couple of days.
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #5  
TKDalumni's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,282
From: Down the street on the left
Rep Power: 155
TKDalumni is just really niceTKDalumni is just really niceTKDalumni is just really niceTKDalumni is just really nice
This thread is so 4 years ago...
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 08:34 PM
  #6  
sdorn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 326
From: Atlanta
Rep Power: 32
sdorn is infamous around these parts
You know, the forum administrator could set it so that threads are closed after they get x number of months old if this was really an issue for him/her.
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #7  
wross996TT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,660
Rep Power: 254
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Shane, we mostly police our own site here...feeling a bit guilty are we.
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #8  
sdorn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 326
From: Atlanta
Rep Power: 32
sdorn is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by wross996TT
Shane, we mostly police our own site here...feeling a bit guilty are we.
Not at all. I have read a few old threads. That is where a lot of the best information is found. If I feel like posting to them, I will do so. If I have a question I feel warrants a new thread, I will start one.
 
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 01:18 AM
  #9  
ard's Avatar
ard
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,981
From: N. California
Rep Power: 298
ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !
I mod elsewhere and find that adding to the old discussion is the most efficient instead of creating a new thread and expecting folks to regurgitate all the old background info, or - since the new thread lacks the background- it invites a retelling of old info.

It is worth the 'new poster' to acknowledge they know it is an old thread and placing the new request in context....


whatever I guess...

A
 
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 02:04 AM
  #10  
jimmer23's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,771
From: NYC
Rep Power: 136
jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !jimmer23 Is a GOD !
I agree with Shane on this. While the past few days have been annoying with nothing of value added to some of these old threads, I think posting to old in general is far better than writing a new thread. You keep the discussion rolling, make it easier on future searches, and avoid the dreaded warning to "use the search function dude".

I know I've revived a thread or two due to additional information to add, or questions that went unanswered then but the info is now available.

Not all of us were fortunate enough to be here 4 years ago. If it's an old and uninteresting thread for you maybe just moving on is the answer. Or maybe giving the tread-starters the ability to close their own threads would be better??
 
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #11  
Maximus's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 218
From: Illinois
Rep Power: 28
Maximus is infamous around these parts
Ditto , I have been the victim of this as well

Originally Posted by jimmer23
I agree with Shane on this. While the past few days have been annoying with nothing of value added to some of these old threads, I think posting to old in general is far better than writing a new thread. You keep the discussion rolling, make it easier on future searches, and avoid the dreaded warning to "use the search function dude".

I know I've revived a thread or two due to additional information to add, or questions that went unanswered then but the info is now available.

Not all of us were fortunate enough to be here 4 years ago. If it's an old and uninteresting thread for you maybe just moving on is the answer. Or maybe giving the tread-starters the ability to close their own threads would be better??
 
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 05:41 AM
  #12  
rhudeboye's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 388
From: USA
Rep Power: 34
rhudeboye is infamous around these parts
Stand by, I'll post my comments in 2010
 
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #13  
Bill W's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 273
From: NC
Rep Power: 33
Bill W is infamous around these parts
You know most forums if you ask the same questions that have already been asked before all the members will chime in with "use the search function".
 
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #14  
wross996TT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,660
Rep Power: 254
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Bill W
You know most forums if you ask the same questions that have already been asked before all the members will chime in with "use the search function".
Not quite sure why you post this? In my first post I indicated it is absolutely encouraged to read past posts...just no need to add posts to them and bring them back...I have looked over the new "added" posts for any value and there has been NONE. But it seems you like looking at 4 year old threads with absolutely nothing new added...I guess it saves server space
 
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #15  
kilrgt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
From: Toronto Canada
Rep Power: 82
kilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to behold
I agree most of the best info is found on older posts, I also agree that making a new post is sometimes valid....sometimes.Nothing pisses me off when i see someone ask a question that was covered in a previous post.Maybe some of the noobs are understandable but the search function is there for a reason.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 PM.