996 Previous model naturally aspirated Porsche 911 community. Discuss C2, C2s, C4, C4s, Targa and Cabriolets.

Installed Aasco flywheel: my impressions

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #16  
nine9six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 561
From: OC, CA
Rep Power: 43
nine9six is infamous around these partsnine9six is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
you get it for a "freer" revving tranny/engine. you end up having to rev up a bit more from the get-go since the flywheel is lighter and you have to shift faster since the revs fall faster.
Why would you need to rev up a bit more from the get-go? With my lwfw, my car revs up a lot faster from the get go even from the bottom end.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #17  
mathism's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,171
From: Chicago, IL USA
Rep Power: 90
mathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond repute
FWIW - This older thread covered the lwfw issue with an article showing dyno results on a Z06.
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...highlight=lwfw
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #18  
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,103
From: Kirkland, WA
Rep Power: 147
Benjamin Choi is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by nine9six
Why would you need to rev up a bit more from the get-go? With my lwfw, my car revs up a lot faster from the get go even from the bottom end.
Less mass, less inertia

look fellas, my whole point is, if it adds power, it's hairsplit power. why some of you are so fanatical about every little hp especially on a normally aspirated car astounds me in a strictly sitcom entertainment kind of way.

get the lightweight flywheel if you prefer the changed up engine characteristics. i'd never do it for this because the flat6 is not the most free-revving engine in this world. look to ///M for that or get a 997GT3.
 

Last edited by Benjamin Choi; Jun 17, 2008 at 02:51 PM.
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #19  
nine9six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 561
From: OC, CA
Rep Power: 43
nine9six is infamous around these partsnine9six is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
Less mass, less inertia

look fellas, my whole point is, if it adds power, it's hairsplit power. why some of you are so fanatical about every little hp especially on a normally aspirated car astounds me in a strictly sitcom entertainment kind of way.

get the lightweight flywheel if you prefer the changed up engine characteristics. i'd never do it for this because the flat6 is not the most free-revving engine in this world. look to ///M for that or get a 997GT3.
We are not talking about hp gains here as there was no changes to the engine itself to gain any hp. What I am talking about is pure acceleration. I don't know what kind of experience you have had with lwfw but this is my 2nd experience with it and base on my own personal experience (not internet reading), the acceleration is better with the lighter flywheel. And in my opinion, the change is significant.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #20  
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,103
From: Kirkland, WA
Rep Power: 147
Benjamin Choi is infamous around these parts
then show us evidence of the gains v. common dyno butt remarks so many people make online claiming this and that about the additional hp/power that they feel from perf mods that i believe don't do jack to actually make your car faster.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #21  
nine9six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 561
From: OC, CA
Rep Power: 43
nine9six is infamous around these partsnine9six is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
then show us evidence of the gains v. common dyno butt remarks so many people make online claiming this and that about the additional hp/power that they feel from perf mods that i believe don't do jack to actually make your car faster.
Do you believe that lighter weight cars will go faster than heavier cars given the same power same gearing?

Lighter weight flywheel is just as common sense as that. The car will have less effort to accelerate due to less rotating mass at the flywheel. In this case, the mass is about 50% less.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #22  
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,103
From: Kirkland, WA
Rep Power: 147
Benjamin Choi is infamous around these parts
Hey man, i agree with you 10000000%. i don't mean to rag on your mod, but i'm just saying for the greater community it's a misnomer to do this mod because it's going to make your car faster. it's like debating how your 911 is faster than the chick's 911 because she outweights you by 100lbs.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #23  
nine9six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 561
From: OC, CA
Rep Power: 43
nine9six is infamous around these partsnine9six is infamous around these parts
Ben, I am a pretty skeptical guy myself when it comes to modding a N/A car. Most mods, I don't feel gains if any. For the most part its a placebo effect or a louder car that makes people think it is faster. But for this mod, I don't think my mind is playing tricks on me as I watch my RPM revs up while in first gear and I hit the limiter. I hardly ever hit the rev limiter unless I am not paying attention.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:20 PM
  #24  
mathism's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,171
From: Chicago, IL USA
Rep Power: 90
mathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond reputemathism has a reputation beyond repute
Ewwww.... fat chicks in a 911?
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #25  
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,103
From: Kirkland, WA
Rep Power: 147
Benjamin Choi is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by nine9six
Ben, I am a pretty skeptical guy myself when it comes to modding a N/A car. Most mods, I don't feel gains if any. For the most part its a placebo effect or a louder car that makes people think it is faster. But for this mod, I don't think my mind is playing tricks on me as I watch my RPM revs up while in first gear and I hit the limiter. I hardly ever hit the rev limiter unless I am not paying attention.
Revving up faster and more power to the ground are two very different things, man. Good to hear that you and I are playing in the same sandbox with regard to placebo awareness.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #26  
Ray S (Chicago)'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 314
From: North Carolina
Rep Power: 36
Ray S (Chicago) has a spectacular aura aboutRay S (Chicago) has a spectacular aura aboutRay S (Chicago) has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
i'd never do it for this because the flat6 is not the most free-revving engine in this world. look to ///M for that or get a 997GT3.
Ben, you know what kind of engine the 997 GT3 has right?

(hint, the answer is a flat-6)
(another hint, it can also benefit from a LWFW)
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #27  
nine9six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 561
From: OC, CA
Rep Power: 43
nine9six is infamous around these partsnine9six is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
Revving up faster and more power to the ground are two very different things, man. Good to hear that you and I are playing in the same sandbox with regard to placebo awareness.
Yup, reving up faster = faster acceleration.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #28  
nine9six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 561
From: OC, CA
Rep Power: 43
nine9six is infamous around these partsnine9six is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Ray S (Chicago)
Ben, you know what kind of engine the 997 GT3 has right?

(hint, the answer is a flat-6)
(another hint, it can also benefit from a LWFW)
I notice many of the 996 GT3 owners upgrade to the RS flywheel. I would have gone this route myself but the GT3RS flywheel have 9 bolts.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 04:16 PM
  #29  
DeAd-EyE's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,101
From: Toronto, ON
Rep Power: 65
DeAd-EyE is infamous around these parts
nine9six,
glad you're happy with the flywheel..i will be doing it as well when my clutch blows and its time to pull the gearbox and put a new one in.
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #30  
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,103
From: Kirkland, WA
Rep Power: 147
Benjamin Choi is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Ray S (Chicago)
Ben, you know what kind of engine the 997 GT3 has right?

(hint, the answer is a flat-6)
(another hint, it can also benefit from a LWFW)
it's a special flat6 and you know this. to compare the M96 to the GT1 based gt3 with all its special high-rev bits that even the turbo engine doesn't have is... like comparing the M3 S54 motor to the one in the 330i.

world's apart.

i've done my research on the lightweight flywheel here in the 911 world. all signs point to --> stick to stock.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.