TPC or EVOMS supercharger??
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 330
From: Denver, Dallas, Chicago
Rep Power: 32
So,
Running a dyno test takes more than simply driving a car onto the rollers and connecting a computer. Most customers will accept the results without question. Few people that I know even attempt to eliminate any of the several variables that are criticle to get accurate results. Transmission lube temperature can make as much as a 5% difference in results. This fact alone may account for most of the gains you show.
Running a dyno test takes more than simply driving a car onto the rollers and connecting a computer. Most customers will accept the results without question. Few people that I know even attempt to eliminate any of the several variables that are criticle to get accurate results. Transmission lube temperature can make as much as a 5% difference in results. This fact alone may account for most of the gains you show.
He does have you on that one my friend.
Maybe I should post up my dyno action for you guys.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 120
From: fullerton, ca
Rep Power: 23
already in process of this . Just saw the posts that were being made somewhat question the itegrity of my shop,,would not stand for even the hint of that. just wanted to make things perfectly clear. During initial testing man things were consisdered and the swap was done back and forth various times. All the information isnt for this thread
Last edited by Denis GTPRO; Aug 25, 2008 at 08:41 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,538
From: North Dakota
Rep Power: 504
Your words
If the quality of your dyno testing was similar to those that were posted by RSS, that may where your problems is. You should post the air/fuel ratio chart captured during your dyno tests. It will show all of us on this board exactly what a gimmick it is.
I find it so funny that no one, not RSS or anyone else can explain where the additional power comes from when in fact the intake has done nothing but change the velocity of the air passing into the intake. There is no increase in the amount of air getting to the engine as measured by the sensor. I guess some people don't like to hear experiences contrary to what they believe.
I can and have gotten 20+ hp more out a stock 996 by installing a 50 cent resister.
Voodoo is still probably the best word to explain this awesome power increase. But, if you THINK you got more power, then you should be happy."
If the quality of my dyno tests were similar to the ones posted by RSS.......uh ALL RSS IPD plenum numbers were on my dyno ....i think my reading conprehension is fine.
If the quality of your dyno testing was similar to those that were posted by RSS, that may where your problems is. You should post the air/fuel ratio chart captured during your dyno tests. It will show all of us on this board exactly what a gimmick it is.
I find it so funny that no one, not RSS or anyone else can explain where the additional power comes from when in fact the intake has done nothing but change the velocity of the air passing into the intake. There is no increase in the amount of air getting to the engine as measured by the sensor. I guess some people don't like to hear experiences contrary to what they believe.
I can and have gotten 20+ hp more out a stock 996 by installing a 50 cent resister.
Voodoo is still probably the best word to explain this awesome power increase. But, if you THINK you got more power, then you should be happy."
If the quality of my dyno tests were similar to the ones posted by RSS.......uh ALL RSS IPD plenum numbers were on my dyno ....i think my reading conprehension is fine.
If so, I saw decent gains immediately after the install. We gave the ECU zero time to "relearn" the new component. We strapped it on the dyno, ran it, installed the plenum, then ran it again. I have the charts posted on here somewhere.
Before you question the dyno, it was on a dynapack. I'm not sure you can get more consistent back to back runs on any other dyno, with it being hooked up to the hubs. The dynapack removes most variables (strap tension, tire pressure, drum weight, etc) that are problematic on other measuring systems.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
I haven't been following the posts between you two that closely, but are referring to RSS' "plenum"?
If so, I saw decent gains immediately after the install. We gave the ECU zero time to "relearn" the new component. We strapped it on the dyno, ran it, installed the plenum, then ran it again. I have the charts posted on here somewhere.
Before you question the dyno, it was on a dynapack. I'm not sure you can get more consistent back to back runs on any other dyno, with it being hooked up to the hubs. The dynapack removes most variables (strap tension, tire pressure, drum weight, etc) that are problematic on other measuring systems.
If so, I saw decent gains immediately after the install. We gave the ECU zero time to "relearn" the new component. We strapped it on the dyno, ran it, installed the plenum, then ran it again. I have the charts posted on here somewhere.
Before you question the dyno, it was on a dynapack. I'm not sure you can get more consistent back to back runs on any other dyno, with it being hooked up to the hubs. The dynapack removes most variables (strap tension, tire pressure, drum weight, etc) that are problematic on other measuring systems.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smac
Automobiles For Sale
0
Sep 26, 2015 05:55 PM
