997 TT beats GT-R at Ring. Nissan accused of cheating.
Banned
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 192
From: UK
Rep Power: 0
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
996/997/CGT:
In order of E.T.:
09.67 @ 149.8 – ToddZ / RWD
09.79 @ 146.4 - dk996tt / 997TT AWD
09.91 @ 145.6 - Markski / RWD
10.45 @ 146.8 - Divexxtreme / RWD
10.50 @ 140.6 - Joetwint / AWD
10.62 @ 132.5 - Sharky / AWD
10.66 @ 132.6 - Achicchelli / 997TT AWD TIP
10.74 @ 131.7 - Hamann7 / AWD
10.75 @ 135.3 - Chris Green / RWD
10.77 @ 131.5 - RenntechV12 / GT2
So a GT-R with an intercooler pipe, ecu flash, exhaust, meth injection kit, and intake filters ran in the top 11 on this Porsche list!
Another GT-R with exhaust, wheel bearings and, pulleys and ecu flash also ran in the top 11 on this list. With the car being our for only 3 months I would say that is very impressive.
In order of E.T.:
09.67 @ 149.8 – ToddZ / RWD
09.79 @ 146.4 - dk996tt / 997TT AWD
09.91 @ 145.6 - Markski / RWD
10.45 @ 146.8 - Divexxtreme / RWD
10.50 @ 140.6 - Joetwint / AWD
10.62 @ 132.5 - Sharky / AWD
10.66 @ 132.6 - Achicchelli / 997TT AWD TIP
10.74 @ 131.7 - Hamann7 / AWD
10.75 @ 135.3 - Chris Green / RWD
10.77 @ 131.5 - RenntechV12 / GT2
So a GT-R with an intercooler pipe, ecu flash, exhaust, meth injection kit, and intake filters ran in the top 11 on this Porsche list!
Another GT-R with exhaust, wheel bearings and, pulleys and ecu flash also ran in the top 11 on this list. With the car being our for only 3 months I would say that is very impressive.Your math is as bad as your trolling. The GT-R has only been out for 3 months??? Who cares? You keep trying to change the thread subject to drag racing with the meth injected GT-R when it has nothing to do with this thread.
Banned
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 36
From: NYC
Rep Power: 20
After reading all the posts, I've decided to wait for the 998TT and picked up an obsidian black GTR. It's just sooooo much cheaper than a 911 Turbo. You guys prolly knew I was headed that way anyways. I know there are great deals on used 911tt's but it's so much nicer to have new 
I'll tell you this thing is fast and fun to drive. The ride is really harsh and the interior cheap compared to Audi, BMW and Porsche but man it's so easy to go fast. And yes, I had to sign all the docs about the noise, warranty and all that so I'm terrified to to disable anything. I just throw everything into R mode and step on the pedal. You guys may find this funny. When I was at the bank and asked for the certified check to Nissan, they were like "Are you buying three cars?" haha. I felt kinda silly laying down that much for a Nissan but what the hell. I'll be the first to post a tranny issue when it happens but for now I'm having too much fun with it. Pics soon.
I'll tell you this thing is fast and fun to drive. The ride is really harsh and the interior cheap compared to Audi, BMW and Porsche but man it's so easy to go fast. And yes, I had to sign all the docs about the noise, warranty and all that so I'm terrified to to disable anything. I just throw everything into R mode and step on the pedal. You guys may find this funny. When I was at the bank and asked for the certified check to Nissan, they were like "Are you buying three cars?" haha. I felt kinda silly laying down that much for a Nissan but what the hell. I'll be the first to post a tranny issue when it happens but for now I'm having too much fun with it. Pics soon.
Last edited by HUGH JASS; Dec 15, 2008 at 12:27 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,028
From: Houston
Rep Power: 201
How is my math bad? Do tell.....
I am not trying to turn this thread into anything. Other members keep saying the GT-R is slower in the 60-130 times, which I showed was inaccurate. A lot of the times posted on this forum for those runs were probably using a G-Tech? The Car and Driver times are accurate using a GPS tracking system. SO no my math is not bad at all.
I am not trying to turn this thread into anything. Other members keep saying the GT-R is slower in the 60-130 times, which I showed was inaccurate. A lot of the times posted on this forum for those runs were probably using a G-Tech? The Car and Driver times are accurate using a GPS tracking system. SO no my math is not bad at all.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 552
From: San Francisco, CA
Rep Power: 43
Oh wow, the 997tt is way faster because according to the graph.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,028
From: Houston
Rep Power: 201
Since this has clearly escaped Galactose,
all the 60-130mph figures posted on 6speed:
all the 60-130mph figures posted on 6speed:
GPS based performance computer/accelerometer times (V-Box, Drift Box or Performance Box )
PLEASE NOTE: Only GPS based, datalogger times from V-box equipment (Driftbox, performance box, or V-box) will be accepted for this list. No extrapolated times from 1/4 mile time-slips. Also, all submitted data must be reviewed for accuracy and approved by a Subject Matter Expert (SME) before the time is posted.
Current SME's are:
Divexxtreme - Divexxtreme@hotmail.com
Accichelli - acicchelli@hotmail.com
KPG - Kpgtdg1@aol.com
*NOTE: The maximum allowed downhill slope over the course of the run is 3.00%. Any run that exceeds 3.00% will not be posted on the list.
PLEASE NOTE: Only GPS based, datalogger times from V-box equipment (Driftbox, performance box, or V-box) will be accepted for this list. No extrapolated times from 1/4 mile time-slips. Also, all submitted data must be reviewed for accuracy and approved by a Subject Matter Expert (SME) before the time is posted.
Current SME's are:
Divexxtreme - Divexxtreme@hotmail.com
Accichelli - acicchelli@hotmail.com
KPG - Kpgtdg1@aol.com
*NOTE: The maximum allowed downhill slope over the course of the run is 3.00%. Any run that exceeds 3.00% will not be posted on the list.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,028
From: Houston
Rep Power: 201
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 590
From: Chicago
Rep Power: 70
I pulled up to a GTR on Friday night, he revved his engine and then put a sign up in his drivers window. It read " I can not race you no matter how much I want to, my tranny will blow and so does my warranty" I laughed and drove away.
Nissan will pull this car from the market just give it a few more months.
Nissan will pull this car from the market just give it a few more months.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 886
From: Florida
Rep Power: 63
I pulled up to a GTR on Friday night, he revved his engine and then put a sign up in his drivers window. It read " I can not race you no matter how much I want to, my tranny will blow and so does my warranty" I laughed and drove away.
Nissan will pull this car from the market just give it a few more months.
Nissan will pull this car from the market just give it a few more months.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,774
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1007
How is my math bad? Do tell..... I am not trying to turn this thread into anything. Other members keep saying the GT-R is slower in the 60-130 times, which I showed was inaccurate. A lot of the times posted on this forum for those runs were probably using a G-Tech? The Car and Driver times are accurate using a GPS tracking system. SO no my math is not bad at all. If you bothered to actually READ my previous post another GT-R WITHOUT METH did the same 10.8 @ 133mph without LC. Again very impressive times for a brand new car with an exhaust and a reflash. I don't see many 997TT going 10.8@133+ with an exhaust and a reflash. 
I am not trying to turn this thread into anything. Other members keep saying the GT-R is slower in the 60-130 times, which I showed was inaccurate. A lot of the times posted on this forum for those runs were probably using a G-Tech? The Car and Driver times are accurate using a GPS tracking system. SO no my math is not bad at all. If you bothered to actually READ my previous post another GT-R WITHOUT METH did the same 10.8 @ 133mph without LC. Again very impressive times for a brand new car with an exhaust and a reflash. I don't see many 997TT going 10.8@133+ with an exhaust and a reflash. 
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 560
From: Sydney
Rep Power: 41
996/997/CGT:
In order of E.T.:
09.67 @ 149.8 – ToddZ / RWD
09.79 @ 146.4 - dk996tt / 997TT AWD
09.91 @ 145.6 - Markski / RWD
10.45 @ 146.8 - Divexxtreme / RWD
10.50 @ 140.6 - Joetwint / AWD
10.62 @ 132.5 - Sharky / AWD
10.66 @ 132.6 - Achicchelli / 997TT AWD TIP
10.74 @ 131.7 - Hamann7 / AWD
10.75 @ 135.3 - Chris Green / RWD
10.77 @ 131.5 - RenntechV12 / GT2
So a GT-R with an intercooler pipe, ecu flash, exhaust, meth injection kit, and intake filters ran in the top 11 on this Porsche list! Another GT-R with exhaust, wheel bearings and, pulleys and ecu flash also ran in the top 11 on this list. With the car being our for only 3 months I would say that is very impressive.
In order of E.T.:
09.67 @ 149.8 – ToddZ / RWD
09.79 @ 146.4 - dk996tt / 997TT AWD
09.91 @ 145.6 - Markski / RWD
10.45 @ 146.8 - Divexxtreme / RWD
10.50 @ 140.6 - Joetwint / AWD
10.62 @ 132.5 - Sharky / AWD
10.66 @ 132.6 - Achicchelli / 997TT AWD TIP
10.74 @ 131.7 - Hamann7 / AWD
10.75 @ 135.3 - Chris Green / RWD
10.77 @ 131.5 - RenntechV12 / GT2
So a GT-R with an intercooler pipe, ecu flash, exhaust, meth injection kit, and intake filters ran in the top 11 on this Porsche list!
Another GT-R with exhaust, wheel bearings and, pulleys and ecu flash also ran in the top 11 on this list. With the car being our for only 3 months I would say that is very impressive.A stock Corvette ZO6 driven by our own Jamie Furman (10.981) with stock tires ran mighty close to the highly modified Nissan GTR.
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
How is my math bad? Do tell..... I am not trying to turn this thread into anything. Other members keep saying the GT-R is slower in the 60-130 times, which I showed was inaccurate. A lot of the times posted on this forum for those runs were probably using a G-Tech? The Car and Driver times are accurate using a GPS tracking system. SO no my math is not bad at all. If you bothered to actually READ my previous post another GT-R WITHOUT METH did the same 10.8 @ 133mph without LC. Again very impressive times for a brand new car with an exhaust and a reflash. I don't see many 997TT going 10.8@133+ with an exhaust and a reflash.
I am not trying to turn this thread into anything. Other members keep saying the GT-R is slower in the 60-130 times, which I showed was inaccurate. A lot of the times posted on this forum for those runs were probably using a G-Tech? The Car and Driver times are accurate using a GPS tracking system. SO no my math is not bad at all. If you bothered to actually READ my previous post another GT-R WITHOUT METH did the same 10.8 @ 133mph without LC. Again very impressive times for a brand new car with an exhaust and a reflash. I don't see many 997TT going 10.8@133+ with an exhaust and a reflash. Yes, it does show your lack of intelligence. 60-130 times are not anything like 1/4 mile times. There are a lot more cars on that list that will waist that GT-R in a 60-130.
Last edited by heavychevy; Dec 15, 2008 at 06:21 PM.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 112
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 0
I pulled up to a GTR on Friday night, he revved his engine and then put a sign up in his drivers window. It read " I can not race you no matter how much I want to, my tranny will blow and so does my warranty" I laughed and drove away.
Nissan will pull this car from the market just give it a few more months.
Nissan will pull this car from the market just give it a few more months.
True story.