997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Just got a wheel alignment

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #16  
EvilBoffin's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
From: Middle of Redneck Hell, NC
Rep Power: 0
EvilBoffin is infamous around these parts
Thanks for posting Michael, but now I'm more confused then ever about what a supposed 'performance' alignment is for a stock C2S. Could you please clarify these specs, per my questions in red below:

FRONT
camber before -.2 after -.09 <-- PLEASE tell me you meant -0.9 after, NOT -.09 !!
(-.09 is almost NO camber in the front of course, which surely would not help turn-in feel or understeer on any 911.)

toe before 0.09 after 0.07 <-- is this a "per wheel" toe measurement, or Total Toe per axle?
-- Is it TOE-IN or TOE-OUT?
-- Did it change FROM toe-IN before to toe-OUT after, the other way around, or just change ever so slightly as shown?
(a .02-inch change is NOT going to be noticeable to the driver, and is barely within adjustability & the tolerances of typical alignment systems).


REAR
toe before 0.20 after 0.17 <-- Same questions as above... is it Total toe per axle or per wheel?
-- Is that Toe-IN or Toe-OUT after?


I appreciate the info...

.
 
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 10:58 PM
  #17  
EvilBoffin's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
From: Middle of Redneck Hell, NC
Rep Power: 0
EvilBoffin is infamous around these parts
One other question Michael -

How do you like the Hankooks - especially compared to the PS2's ???


Thanks again...
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 06:41 AM
  #18  
Michael2364's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 272
From: New York
Rep Power: 29
Michael2364 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by EvilBoffin
Thanks for posting Michael, but now I'm more confused then ever about what a supposed 'performance' alignment is for a stock C2S. Could you please clarify these specs, per my questions in red below:


FRONT
camber before -.2 after -.09 <-- PLEASE tell me you meant -0.9 after, NOT -.09 !!
(-.09 is almost NO camber in the front of course, which surely would not help turn-in feel or understeer on any 911.)

toe before 0.09 after 0.07 <-- is this a "per wheel" toe measurement, or Total Toe per axle?
-- Is it TOE-IN or TOE-OUT?
-- Did it change FROM toe-IN before to toe-OUT after, the other way around, or just change ever so slightly as shown?
(a .02-inch change is NOT going to be noticeable to the driver, and is barely within adjustability & the tolerances of typical alignment systems).


REAR
toe before 0.20 after 0.17 <-- Same questions as above... is it Total toe per axle or per wheel?
-- Is that Toe-IN or Toe-OUT after?


I appreciate the info...

.
I noticed that typo on the camber after I posted it, and congrats, your the first to catch it. Yes it sould read -.9... The toe was set at .07 per side, with a total toe of 13 degrees on the front. These numbers are positive so it would be toe out. As for the rears, total toe is +.33( toe out ) per axle is +0.17.
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #19  
Michael2364's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 272
From: New York
Rep Power: 29
Michael2364 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by EvilBoffin
One other question Michael -

How do you like the Hankooks - especially compared to the PS2's ???


Thanks again...
Umm they're different. Not in a bad way, just in a characteristics way.I've had them on for about 2 weeks now. The most immediate point I noticed was that they are extreamly quiet. They are great in the rain, and at the public free, police free industrial park where we mess around at on the weekends, they corner very well right out of the box. It was 45 degrees when we first went over there and i have a 15 min drive on slow streets to get there. Not much heat in the tire and on the faster areas,they were great. I'll let you know when I'm 1k into the tires if I still like them.
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 07:46 AM
  #20  
tejoe's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 707
From: Florida & Indiana
Rep Power: 56
tejoe has much to be proud oftejoe has much to be proud oftejoe has much to be proud oftejoe has much to be proud oftejoe has much to be proud oftejoe has much to be proud oftejoe has much to be proud oftejoe has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Michael2364
Umm they're different. Not in a bad way, just in a characteristics way.I've had them on for about 2 weeks now. The most immediate point I noticed was that they are extreamly quiet. They are great in the rain, and at the public free, police free industrial park where we mess around at on the weekends, they corner very well right out of the box. It was 45 degrees when we first went over there and i have a 15 min drive on slow streets to get there. Not much heat in the tire and on the faster areas,they were great. I'll let you know when I'm 1k into the tires if I still like them.

Thanks; yes, please do the 1000 mile follow-up.
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #21  
mdrums's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,800
From: Tampa
Rep Power: 234
mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !
OK there is some mis-information going on here.

1st- negitive camber can make the inside of your tires wear faster....but....massive amounts of toe is what scrubs and wears tires a lot more than camber

2nd- you do not want more than .5 degrees of difference between front and rear camber settings

Here is a good all around street/track setting for stock 2005-09 PASM cars. (*note Sport PASM on 09 cars will allow for more front negitive camber)

FRONT
-1 camber PER SIDE
.02..no more than .04 te PER SIDE
Caster on these car can not be adjusted

REAR
-1.4 to 1.5 PER SIDE(...note keep front and rear camber with in .5 or less degrees)
.12 to .14max toe PER SIDE

Any more toe than what I listed will EAT the tires. I ran these settings for years on the street and get over 15,000 miles from my rears. My fronts did not wear all that much. These settings also work for the track with Toyo R888's with OK wear but depend on the track you drive and your skill level.
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #22  
toddbee's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 0
toddbee is infamous around these parts
Anyone have the factory alignment settings for a 2009 carrera s? i know my gt3 had them listed in the back of the manual, but the carrera s doesnt. Anyone have a print out from the tech manual?
thanks,
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 01:13 PM
  #23  
ryans4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 181
From: San Francisco CA
Rep Power: 29
ryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of light
Originally Posted by mdrums
1st- negitive camber can make the inside of your tires wear faster....but....massive amounts of toe is what scrubs and wears tires a lot more than camber
I want to put a huge 2nd on this. The misconception (and it makes sense) that tilting the top of the wheel inboard (negative camber) from 0.5 to 1.5 degrees seems like a drastic change, at Zero toe on that wheel, the change in tire wear will be minimal.

Now if you go from 0.5 to 7.0 degrees negative, we are talking about something else.

However, if you take toe from Zero to say 1/8" on that wheel, now you've created a huge wear situation, and this will surface on the inside edge since you have the wheel leaning in 1.5 degrees.

As to the original post' alignment, I can see how adding that toe out in the back changed the car quite a bit. I'm curious how common rear toe out in the 997 is?
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #24  
Michael2364's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 272
From: New York
Rep Power: 29
Michael2364 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by mdrums
OK there is some mis-information going on here.

1st- negitive camber can make the inside of your tires wear faster....but....massive amounts of toe is what scrubs and wears tires a lot more than camber

2nd- you do not want more than .5 degrees of difference between front and rear camber settings

Here is a good all around street/track setting for stock 2005-09 PASM cars. (*note Sport PASM on 09 cars will allow for more front negitive camber)

FRONT
-1 camber PER SIDE
.02..no more than .04 te PER SIDE
Caster on these car can not be adjusted

REAR
-1.4 to 1.5 PER SIDE(...note keep front and rear camber with in .5 or less degrees)
.12 to .14max toe PER SIDE

Any more toe than what I listed will EAT the tires. I ran these settings for years on the street and get over 15,000 miles from my rears. My fronts did not wear all that much. These settings also work for the track with Toyo R888's with OK wear but depend on the track you drive and your skill level.
I don't know who your directing this to, but all I did was list the settings they put on the car and I was happy with it. Run your car however you like. I have not read a post on this thread that misinformed anyone of anything. Just a bunch of guys enjoying their cars and discussing what they like about them.
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 01:29 PM
  #25  
Michael2364's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 272
From: New York
Rep Power: 29
Michael2364 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by ryans4
I want to put a huge 2nd on this. The misconception (and it makes sense) that tilting the top of the wheel inboard (negative camber) from 0.5 to 1.5 degrees seems like a drastic change, at Zero toe on that wheel, the change in tire wear will be minimal.

Now if you go from 0.5 to 7.0 degrees negative, we are talking about something else.

However, if you take toe from Zero to say 1/8" on that wheel, now you've created a huge wear situation, and this will surface on the inside edge since you have the wheel leaning in 1.5 degrees.

As to the original post' alignment, I can see how adding that toe out in the back changed the car quite a bit. I'm curious how common rear toe out in the 997 is?
The factory recommended rear toe setting range is 0.08 to 0.25 as per the porsche alignment sheet I got from the dealer when they did the car.
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #26  
ryans4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 181
From: San Francisco CA
Rep Power: 29
ryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of light
Originally Posted by Michael2364
The factory recommended rear toe setting range is 0.08 to 0.25 as per the porsche alignment sheet I got from the dealer when they did the car.
In our Out? I've not seen many factory alignment specs that call for toe out.
 
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #27  
toddbee's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 0
toddbee is infamous around these parts
any one have a factory alignment spec sheet?
 
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 07:31 AM
  #28  
Michael2364's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 272
From: New York
Rep Power: 29
Michael2364 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by ryans4
In our Out? I've not seen many factory alignment specs that call for toe out.
Unless you see a - it's positive or out.
 
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 08:21 AM
  #29  
ryans4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 181
From: San Francisco CA
Rep Power: 29
ryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of lightryans4 is a glorious beacon of light
Originally Posted by Michael2364
Unless you see a - it's positive or out.
This is not true, or at least not always true. In most cases on a modern alignment, Toe-Out is represented as a negative number, not a positive one. I asked because it seemed uncommon, but given the tech's autox experience, likely was used to more aggressive alignments.


Do a search, or use tirerack's explanation on toe:
"Toe is expressed in either degrees or fractions-of-an-inch, and an axle is said to have positive toe-in when imaginary lines running through the centerlines of the tires intersect in front of the vehicle and have negative toe-out when they diverge."

If you are certain it's positive, I think you're running rear toe in, which is more common. That said, still can't find a factory non GT3 alignment specification. Here is the GT3 spec though:

Front Left/Right Specified Range
-1.42d -1.25d Camber
7.50d 8.50d Caster
0d00' 0d05m Toe
-0.17d 0.17d Cross Camber
-0.67d 0.67d Cross Caster
0d05' 0d10' Total Toe

Rear Left/Right Specified Range
-2.08d -1.92d Camber
0d10' 0d15' Toe
-0.17d 0.17d Cross Camber
0d20' 0d25' Total Toe
-0.08d 0.08d Thrust Angle

I believe based on this though and common practice that your positive toe settings are Toe-In.
 
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 08:24 AM
  #30  
utkinpol's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,122
From: Natick, MA
Rep Power: 163
utkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ryans4
This is not true, or at least not always true. In most cases on a modern alignment, Toe-Out is represented as a negative number, not a positive one. I asked because it seemed uncommon, but given the tech's autox experience, likely was used to more aggressive alignments.
interesting numbers.

I spoke to a guy with gt3 rs at auto-x and he told me he runs -2.7 camber in front with -2.3 camber on rear, 0 toe in front and 0.03 positive toe in rear.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
audipwr1
Automobiles For Sale
30
Sep 25, 2021 01:31 PM
eclip5e
Automobiles For Sale
6
Jul 29, 2019 11:13 AM
The Oss
Automobiles For Sale
2
Aug 24, 2015 08:19 PM
Zero911
997 Turbo / GT2
4
Aug 24, 2015 06:51 PM
thegrillboy
Cayenne 958
2
Aug 22, 2015 09:24 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 PM.