997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Better Drive... 997TT or 997S?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 02:49 AM
  #16  
Gibbo205's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 272
From: UK
Rep Power: 28
Gibbo205 is a jewel in the roughGibbo205 is a jewel in the roughGibbo205 is a jewel in the rough
Hi there


You have got to drive both for sure. I've driven both and if you can afford the best solution is to take both, but for me I could not afford both and the Turbo was stretching it, so I went with a spec'd up 997 S, Aerokit, Ceramics, X51 etc.


Turbo Advantages:-
Incredible in-gear acceleration and acceleration full stop (0-100mph in 8s stock)
Hugely tunable on 997.1 TT, easy and affordable to get 600-650BHP (0-100mph in 6s region)
Great traction and safety from 4WD system.
Generally more reliable as derived from GT1 engine.
Sound of the turbos ripping up the road is rather cool.


997 S X51 aerokit Advantages:-
Zero lag, very sensitive throttle with instant pick up.
More rawer driving experience, as close to GT3 as it gets without been a GT3
Incredible sound, engine note/snarl really shines through.
Considered a more purist driving experience, sharper front end, quicker steering etc.
Weighs far less 1390kg vs 1550kg


For me in the twisties and on trackdays I find the 997 S a more purer and fun experience as its a lot more engaging and the engine wants to rev a lot more naturally and faster all in all making it the better drive on country/twisty roads and track days.

The turbo however, nothing can beat the grin on your face when those turbos spool up and propel you to warp speed. The additional traction can sometimes come into use on those really wet days or for more novice drivers, but if your a good driver a C2S or GT3 has more than enough grip. The turbo is the better cruiser and has incredible power and tuning it can see another 150-200BHP for relative little money at which point the performance on offer is truly amazing and internal organ re-arranging.

I'd say the 997 S is a more sharper precise tool and in the right spec is ideal for those who want but can't afford a GT3 or want a GT3 like car but with everyday usability.

The 997 TT is more for those who want great straight line power, enjoy tuning their cars to make them even quicker but still enjoy the twisties as its 90% as good as the C2S in such situations and for the novice driver has the more sure footedness though the power can still get you in trouble.

Like I said if you can afford both, get both.
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 05:55 AM
  #17  
Manifold's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,670
Rep Power: 195
Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !
Manifold -- I am totally with you on the Rs 4.0 .
Just to clarrify .. when I said "Gt3" I was splitting hairs over the models. The 4.0 was not out yet .
Understood.

The biggest snag isn't the car .. nor the price . i actually feel its decently priced for what the car offers . I just can't imagine owning one and driving it on the streets of South Florida . The road construction and carelessness amongst many of the drivers is not the ideal setting for any supercar . As it is .. I find myself driving my Porsches less than my M3 and Honda more .

Sadly .. even the M3 is too nice a vehicle for this place .
Agreed. Plus, the straight flat roads don't bring out the best in a Porsche, though Florida is nice for a cab.
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 06:05 AM
  #18  
Manifold's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,670
Rep Power: 195
Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by yrralis1
It's not a street car but can be a great weekend toy . some guys pound the pavement that they drive it daily .. much like some women who weigh 300 lbs wear high heels and say their knees are fine.
I can imagine having the GT3 as a DD, except that the huge wing in the back is a dealbreaker from an image standpoint. One of my important clients is in my building, so it feels like big brother is always watching.
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #19  
LambOfGod's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 158
From: Nashville, TN
Rep Power: 0
LambOfGod is infamous around these partsLambOfGod is infamous around these partsLambOfGod is infamous around these parts
I like the feel of a normally aspirated engine compared to a turbo because the torque curve is more linear. Turbo cars tend to come on very strong which tends to make the vehicle get away from you at times. The TT would be a sick car to own and I wouldn't kick it to the curb but if I had the money I'd buy a GT3 over a TT. I'd probably even pick the C2S over the TT.
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 08:09 AM
  #20  
sizquik's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 603
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 72
sizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Evoking
So I just drove an 08 997TT today. I recall reading all of these articles talking about how great the 996TT is but how the 997TT is even better - and how they all but eliminated turbo lag etc.

Well I beg to differ. The car was an absolute beast on boost. But it definitely had lag. On an NA 500hp car if you burry the gas from a dead stop (without dropping the clutch) you get an instant response. With the 997TT there is a few seconds before it rips your neck off!

Anyhow, I digress. So I'm wondering if the 997TT is a case of more is not always more. I have not driven a 997S yet but plan to. Seems like the NA while slower could be a purer driving experience - better sound, quicker throttle response etc.

Anyone driven or owned both? Or shopped both and can give some feedback on which they think is the better drive?
I agree that the NA would be a purer diving experience and that's it's more fun to drive a slow car fast rather than a fast car slow which is one the of the reasons I bought a Base C2.
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 01:37 PM
  #21  
Manifold's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,670
Rep Power: 195
Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by sizquik
I agree that the NA would be a purer diving experience and that's it's more fun to drive a slow car fast rather than a fast car slow which is one the of the reasons I bought a Base C2.
Good point. In the same vein, I think it's more important for a road car to feel fast rather than be fast. Since we're not racing, the point is to have fun, rather than to get from A to B as quickly as possible.
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 02:58 PM
  #22  
sizquik's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 603
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 72
sizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Manifold
Good point. In the same vein, I think it's more important for a road car to feel fast rather than be fast. Since we're not racing, the point is to have fun, rather than to get from A to B as quickly as possible.
Your point is why I bought the carrera instead of an M3. The Porsche felt much more "alive" to me.
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 03:13 PM
  #23  
Manifold's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,670
Rep Power: 195
Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by sizquik
Your point is why I bought the carrera instead of an M3. The Porsche felt much more "alive" to me.
Likewise for me. It came down to the 911S cab and M3 vert, and the Porsche was an easy winner based on the fun factor (despite the considerably higher cost).
 

Last edited by Manifold; Oct 10, 2011 at 06:00 PM.
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 03:25 PM
  #24  
LambOfGod's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 158
From: Nashville, TN
Rep Power: 0
LambOfGod is infamous around these partsLambOfGod is infamous around these partsLambOfGod is infamous around these parts
Wow...isn't this the truth. I went to the Gym yesterday and parked on a corner spot so I could hug the curb. Wouldn't you know it....some stepford wife parks so close to my car anyway. No door dings thank god but give me a break! Same thing happen at the store the other day...I actually went back out to my car to move it because some goofball parked so close to my car. I drive the F150 Truck or GTI more often now because I cannot handle the brain damage parking the PCar.

Originally Posted by yrralis1
Manifold -- I am totally with you on the Rs 4.0 .
Just to clarrify .. when I said "Gt3" I was splitting hairs over the models. The 4.0 was not out yet .

The biggest snag isn't the car .. nor the price . i actually feel its decently priced for what the car offers . I just can't imagine owning one and driving it on the streets of South Florida . The road construction and carelessness amongst many of the drivers is not the ideal setting for any supercar . As it is .. I find myself driving my Porsches less than my M3 and Honda more .

Sadly .. even the M3 is too nice a vehicle for this place .
 
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 05:06 PM
  #25  
ryem3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,335
From: Rye, NY
Rep Power: 202
ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by LambOfGod
Wow...isn't this the truth. I went to the Gym yesterday and parked on a corner spot so I could hug the curb. Wouldn't you know it....some stepford wife parks so close to my car anyway. No door dings thank god but give me a break! Same thing happen at the store the other day...I actually went back out to my car to move it because some goofball parked so close to my car. I drive the F150 Truck or GTI more often now because I cannot handle the brain damage parking the PCar.
Just one of the reasons I gave it up. Worry a lot less, although still some, with the M3.
 
Old Oct 11, 2011 | 02:50 PM
  #26  
DoninDEN's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,115
From: Denver, CO
Rep Power: 79
DoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by yrralis1
I am also a NA owner as i have both a 997tt and a 997S . hands down I'd pick the Turbo .. so much so that i bought the 997S in part to preserve the miles on the Turbo in order to keep it long term .

As for cost .. you are right .. the car should have been a 10 second car in stock form but perhaps porsche didn't want average drivers crashing them on public roads (so they made the car tame ) . They made a luxury power car much like an AMG Benz. (which BTW is expensive too)

When they revised the car with the 997.2tt they made significant improvemenrs yet the car can not be modified to the same levels as the 997.1tt. So it really boils down to whether the owner prefers getting a great stock car vs buildiing an amazing modded car .

As for the 997S .. it offers a balance . It's not a Gt3. It's not a Turbo . it's not even as fast as cars which cost less .
So in both categories it lacks the same greatness but what it does have is the versatilty that the others lack .

I have driven both of my cars back to back . There really is no comparison . Both are modded with quality parts .

I like my 997S .. but am in love with my Turbo . Big difference.
What about supercharging your 997S? That would be an interesting comparison since you have both.
 
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 06:37 AM
  #27  
slant83's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 326
From: South Florida
Rep Power: 33
slant83 has a spectacular aura aboutslant83 has a spectacular aura aboutslant83 has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by yrralis1
Manifold -- I am totally with you on the Rs 4.0 .
Just to clarrify .. when I said "Gt3" I was splitting hairs over the models. The 4.0 was not out yet .

The biggest snag isn't the car .. nor the price . i actually feel its decently priced for what the car offers . I just can't imagine owning one and driving it on the streets of South Florida . The road construction and carelessness amongst many of the drivers is not the ideal setting for any supercar . As it is .. I find myself driving my Porsches less than my M3 and Honda more .

Sadly .. even the M3 is too nice a vehicle for this place .
..I find myself doing the same thing here in S Florida. The carelessness and numerous drivers without insurance, licenses (and perhaps insurance), I drive my P cars mostly on weekends and use the 335 as a DD. Almost a crime but thats the world we live in..especially now in bad economic times with the "haters" out there there is almost a fear of driving a nice vehicle. True, even the BMW is too nice here in "little brown toyota" land.
 
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 09:21 AM
  #28  
terrence's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 566
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 47
terrence is a jewel in the roughterrence is a jewel in the roughterrence is a jewel in the rough
Had both.

If you want a faster, quieter and more comfortable car, get the turbo.

If you want a lighter, more agile car with a more pure driving experience and also sounds better, get the Carrera S, or better yet, get a GTS with a manual.
 
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 01:37 PM
  #29  
IslandS62's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 266
From: Honolulu
Rep Power: 30
IslandS62 is a glorious beacon of lightIslandS62 is a glorious beacon of lightIslandS62 is a glorious beacon of lightIslandS62 is a glorious beacon of lightIslandS62 is a glorious beacon of light
Only on this forum is a 997 C2S considered a "slow" car.
 
Old Oct 12, 2011 | 07:13 PM
  #30  
ryem3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,335
From: Rye, NY
Rep Power: 202
ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !ryem3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by terrence
Had both.

If you want a faster, quieter and more comfortable car, get the turbo.

If you want a lighter, more agile car with a more pure driving experience and also sounds better, get the Carrera S, or better yet, get a GTS with a manual.
OMG, your garage is to be worshipped!
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 PM.