Need opinions and advice on potential 997S purchase
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,190
From: Benton County, AR
Rep Power: 147
You pay a premium for a lower mileage car but the premium evaporates as you add the miles. IOWs, the car depreciates.
A well maintained higher mileage car suffers less depreciation as the miles accumulate.
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
A higher mileage car can be the better choice for a daily driver.
You pay a premium for a lower mileage car but the premium evaporates as you add the miles. IOWs, the car depreciates.
A well maintained higher mileage car suffers less depreciation as the miles accumulate.
You pay a premium for a lower mileage car but the premium evaporates as you add the miles. IOWs, the car depreciates.
A well maintained higher mileage car suffers less depreciation as the miles accumulate.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,230
From: Long Island, New York
Rep Power: 78
These cars are meant to be driven (hard). Garage queens tend to have more problems than cars that are driven on a regular basis. I would not shy away from a higher mileage car provided that all of the maintenance has been kept up to date (and documented).
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 16
From: SF Bay Area
Rep Power: 0
I noticed no one answered this for you. 996 and early 2005 997.1s had a single row IMS bearing. These were much more susceptible to the IMS issue. Mid 2005 and newer 997.1s had a dual row IMS bearing that were much improved. Failure of either one would be catastrophic. 997.2 did away with this altogether. There's a website that describes which engine numbers got the dual row bearing in 2005 but I can't find it.
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
I noticed no one answered this for you. 996 and early 2005 997.1s had a single row IMS bearing. These were much more susceptible to the IMS issue. Mid 2005 and newer 997.1s had a dual row IMS bearing that were much improved. Failure of either one would be catastrophic. 997.2 did away with this altogether. There's a website that describes which engine numbers got the dual row bearing in 2005 but I can't find it.