997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Downshifting

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 01:25 AM
  #1  
ICN2U's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 150
From: Newport Beach, CA
Rep Power: 27
ICN2U is infamous around these parts
Downshifting

I took a buddy of mine for a ride (he's a corvette driver) and he saw me downshift into 1st gear and he freaked out. He said that it's bad for the transmission...muttering something about "snycromesh" or some such thing. He said you're "supposed" to pop it from 2nd into neutral then coast to a stop?
Pardon my ignorance but am I hurting my car? What's the deal?
Thanks!
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 02:05 AM
  #2  
mishref's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,096
From: Michigan / Kuwait
Rep Power: 64
mishref is infamous around these parts
From what I know (could be wrong ), you shouldn't downshift into first to slow down. It puts unnecessary pressure on the tranny and you run the risk of over-revving. As for the 'syncromesh'; I think means that you are putting needless wear on the synchros by going through the gears.

I wouldn't say your 'hurting' your car .. just putting stress that can be avoided.
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 02:21 AM
  #3  
smistry007's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 550
From: Palos Verdes, California
Rep Power: 72
smistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond reputesmistry007 has a reputation beyond repute
If you are just trying to slow down, use the brakes- after all, changing pads is cheaper than changing a tranny....on the other hand if you are downshifting to trying to maintain revs/ boost, that is a different story....

Sameer
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 04:02 AM
  #4  
cynicali's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 718
From: Ballard, baby.
Rep Power: 49
cynicali is infamous around these parts
^^^ what he said ^^^

go to first if your pullin your *** out of a nasty situation but if the light just turned red, use the brakes.
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 07:40 AM
  #5  
JoeyG's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,778
From: Philly Suburbs
Rep Power: 143
JoeyG has much to be proud ofJoeyG has much to be proud ofJoeyG has much to be proud ofJoeyG has much to be proud ofJoeyG has much to be proud ofJoeyG has much to be proud ofJoeyG has much to be proud ofJoeyG has much to be proud ofJoeyG has much to be proud of
Your brakes are much stronger than the transmission for stopping, so there's really no reason NOT to use them. I'd say coast in whatever gear you're in if you're coming up to a red light and clutching just prior to stopping. Whatever you do, enjoy your car!
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #6  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
I don't touch the brakes until I am already downshifted to first. It puts no additional wear and tear on the car as does downshifting to 3rd, or 2nd or any other gear. Obviously, the abruptness is engine speed dependent. There are synco's in all forward gears, so this guys arguement would dictate that you never downshift...period....inyto any gear.

Brakes are ment to be used to STOP and NOT slow down.


Maybe you guys who suck down the oil would benefit from some regular high rpm engine braking.
 

Last edited by 1999Porsche911; Apr 16, 2006 at 08:51 AM.
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 09:12 AM
  #7  
BBGT2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,338
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 241
BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !BBGT2 Is a GOD !
I personally never would use 1st gear to slow the car down, it does not make any sense to do so. Brakes are meant to slow a car down and stop it.
There is no way engine braking can come close to slowing a car down versus downshifting it just not possible, on a race track you do downshift and rather quickly apply the correct amount of brake pedal. Downshifting into 1st is creating unnecesary wear and tear to your engine/driveline.

Bajo
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #8  
Gramicci101's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,725
From: Delawhere?
Rep Power: 230
Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !Gramicci101 Is a GOD !
I've seen people downshift to first while racing, and it freaked me out. I guess it depends on your car, though. My first and reverse gears don't have synchros, so I would have to double clutch to even get into first while moving. I usually downshift into second and then use the brakes to stop the rest of the way.
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #9  
MichaelL's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 418
From: Florida
Rep Power: 38
MichaelL is infamous around these partsMichaelL is infamous around these parts
Downshifting into first coming to a complete stop makes little sense. You should only shift down from second if you are will be able to resume speed without stopping in traffic. The car will pull away cleanly in second from 5 to 10 mph with smoothly applied partial throttle. If the engine is lugging, it will tell you.
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #10  
synergy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 857
From: San Jose, CA
Rep Power: 63
synergy is a splendid one to beholdsynergy is a splendid one to beholdsynergy is a splendid one to beholdsynergy is a splendid one to beholdsynergy is a splendid one to beholdsynergy is a splendid one to beholdsynergy is a splendid one to behold
I agree with the majority here....use the brakes not 1st gear to stop. Replacing the brakes is much better then replacing the clutch or tranny down the road.
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #11  
bpanos's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 528
From: Cali
Rep Power: 46
bpanos is a jewel in the roughbpanos is a jewel in the roughbpanos is a jewel in the roughbpanos is a jewel in the rough
I agree with Synergy and Smistry007..
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #12  
dstrimbu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 72
From: Chicago Area, USA
Rep Power: 23
dstrimbu is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by bpanos
I agree with Synergy and Smistry007..
Yah, I agree with them also. I'll double-clutch (it's sooooo easy on this car!) my way down to third, or maybe second (just to hear the PSE brrrraaaap)... but not first. First is so short in the 997 that I don't think it makes sense.

Automobile Mag projected 75,000 mile brake pad life on their long-term 997 - for the fronts. They projected 100,000 for the rears. With brakes like this, there's no reason to stress the trans and engine, IMHO.

And I haven't used any oil in 1,200 initial miles, thanks...

Seriously - check out any _normal_ automatic transmissioned car - they never shift into first until you come to a full stop.

But, hey - what do I know?

-don
 
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #13  
Kevin034's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 280
Rep Power: 34
Kevin034 is infamous around these parts
i rev-match, i don't double clutch.

once the car gets moving, i never shift it back into 1st unless i'm at a complete stop.
 
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #14  
PMac's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,000
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 108
PMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to behold
Is the issue not to do with spinning up the input shaft, rather than the engine revs? The synchros match the speed of the input shaft to the new gear, then you blip to match the speed of the engine to the speed of the input shaft (unless you double-clutch).

The ratio of gear ratios is greatest going from 2nd to 1st, so that shift places more of a stress on the synchros.

That said, the only time I downshift to 1st is if I'm coasting to a stop, and the light turns green while I'm going less than 10 mph.
 
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 10:22 PM
  #15  
gdctus997's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 747
From: Orange County CA
Rep Power: 0
gdctus997 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Kevin034
i rev-match, i don't double clutch.

once the car gets moving, i never shift it back into 1st unless i'm at a complete stop.
Ditto.

I was taught to NEVER downshift into 1st gear unless you are still or damn near it. Downshifting is the most dangerous action you take (for your car's health) because there is NO rev limiter for downshifting. This when most people who blow up their engine, blow it up. Rev matching will increase the life of your clutch. Brakes should be used for slowing down, not gears. If you ever drive a Ferrari, Maserati or some other car with an auto clutch, you will notice that the computer rev-matches on downshifts, so it does NOT slow you down.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:58 AM.