Pics Posted-Some Mods put on-997 S
Car looks amazing! I love the look of the GT3 bumper with the stock rear-end.
But like "TD in DC" was saying, have you noticed anything different by only using the GT3 front bumper?
I have heard mixed opinions on the necessity of a rear wing to balance stability of the car at high speeds.
But like "TD in DC" was saying, have you noticed anything different by only using the GT3 front bumper?
I have heard mixed opinions on the necessity of a rear wing to balance stability of the car at high speeds.
To be honest I really am not that crazy when I am driving. I drive around 70-90 on the highway and have not really noticed anything different. I have only really had the car 2 weeks though...
I figured the stock rear spoiler that comes up would be sufficient if i needed drag over the rear.
I never really thought about adding a rear spoiler and have a hard time justifying the 3K for the spoiler I somewhat like.
I figured the stock rear spoiler that comes up would be sufficient if i needed drag over the rear.
I never really thought about adding a rear spoiler and have a hard time justifying the 3K for the spoiler I somewhat like.
To be honest I really am not that crazy when I am driving. I drive around 70-90 on the highway and have not really noticed anything different. I have only really had the car 2 weeks though...
I figured the stock rear spoiler that comes up would be sufficient if i needed drag over the rear.
I never really thought about adding a rear spoiler and have a hard time justifying the 3K for the spoiler I somewhat like.
I figured the stock rear spoiler that comes up would be sufficient if i needed drag over the rear.
I never really thought about adding a rear spoiler and have a hard time justifying the 3K for the spoiler I somewhat like.
Again, my comments are meant to be helpful and not arrogant or condescending.
Sorry guys but aerodynamics DO NOTHING under 100 mph. Well in terms of "evasive manueveurs" A slippery car is ideal under 100 and one with some balanced downforce is ideal above. So yes in short the best setup is to have the car balanced front to rear with a proper wing BUT you will not EVER lose control because of it under 100 mph. Thats silly. Thats science. I vote for rear wing and wouldnt do it any other way on my car. My advice to WIZO is to see for himself. A couple of 120-140 mile runs should tell him. Once again im all about the rear wing but if your not going those speeds does it matter???? It's all relative : )
Sorry guys but aerodynamics DO NOTHING under 100 mph. Well in terms of "evasive manueveurs" A slippery car is ideal under 100 and one with some balanced downforce is ideal above. So yes in short the best setup is to have the car balanced front to rear with a proper wing BUT you will not EVER lose control because of it under 100 mph. Thats silly. Thats science. I vote for rear wing and wouldnt do it any other way on my car. My advice to WIZO is to see for himself. A couple of 120-140 mile runs should tell him. Once again im all about the rear wing but if your not going those speeds does it matter???? It's all relative : )
It is not silly at all. Aero is not some kind of magic switch that only comes on at a certain speed. If what you were saying were true, then the rear spoiler coming up at 70 mph and retracting at 45 would be a total farce. You are correct that the aero factor increases with speed, but you are incorrect to state that there is no impact at 80 mph and above, which is what I posited. It is all a question of balance. Just as I did not say you would definitely spin, you cannot reasonably say that "you will not EVER lose control because of it under 100 mph." That is silly.
Again, though, I say to you. If the aero packages were developed ofter extensive testing in wind tunnels, who are we to say that 1/2 of the entire package is irrelevant. That is not logical.
I agree with you that it is all relative. And keep in mind that I said merely that "you would not really know that it was a problem until it is too late," which I firmly believe. Now, if you were talking about putting on the rear wing without the front bumper, I would be less concerned because If you got understeer, you could slow down and deal with it. But oversteer is an entirely other matter.
Last edited by TD in DC; Sep 6, 2007 at 08:21 AM.
How long does it take for the car to get to 100 from 70. Wouldnt it make sense for the spoiler to already be fully up and ready. Thats why it STARTS to come up at 70. Losing control at 80 becasue of aerodynamics im sticking to my guns and what Ive seen and heard at and around the racetrack. Above 100 is where the magic happens.
How long does it take for the car to get to 100 from 70. Wouldnt it make sense for the spoiler to already be fully up and ready. Thats why it STARTS to come up at 70. Losing control at 80 becasue of aerodynamics im sticking to my guns and what Ive seen and heard at and around the racetrack. Above 100 is where the magic happens. 

), and I'm here to tell you that the aero effect builds gradually, not at some magic switch at only above 100 mph. I agree that the magnitude of importance increases with speed, but if you regularly go 80, as the original poster said, then is it really a stretch of the imagination to believe that you might hit triple digits once in awhile? Also, what if you want to take the car to a DE, WHICH I HIGHLY RECOMMEND and imagine you would as well? There you will hit triple digits and it could matter.To me, again, the most important point is that you will not know there is a problem until it is too late. Driving for a year without a problem doesn't confirm that you never would have a problem. Your car, your risk.
Agreed good point. I dont want to start a pissing match either and yes aerodynamics do gradually change with speed. Drivers ed I would say is a great idea and a wing would definetly be a welcome add.
I just did my first mod last night. Not nearly as pretty but very important if you drive in areas where you might bottom out. Plus, the price is right at below $90. Cracking an oilpan would not be cool.
I also got this cool new flashlight that recharges in the cigarette lighter. It glows blue while it is charging.
But still not as cool as a front bumper or rear wing.
I also got this cool new flashlight that recharges in the cigarette lighter. It glows blue while it is charging.
But still not as cool as a front bumper or rear wing.



