67-69 Camaro or 70-72 Chevelle?
I'm looking into getting a 67-69 Camaro, or a 70-72 Chevelle. I just wanted some of your opinions, especially from some of you who might have owned both.
|
Go with whatever car appeals to you the most. With these older cars you have to spend some time and money to make them handle and ride well. Chevelles have been climbing more in value but are still cheaper than Camaros on average. There are more performance suspension options for the Camaro by a wide margin and the used OEM/performance part market is much bigger as well so that is something to consider. Nice Chevelles are more rare to see on the street usually as well.
|
yea, i'm looking for a project. something I can have custom, I've driven both, and like both designs, but I can have 2 projects going on at once. I have been checking craigslist and have found quite a few chevelles around my area for really cheap ($7500 for a decent one).
|
Chevelle's can be found really cheap, and they both look good. For the money go with the chevelle..but If money was not a problem Camaro! Just my opinion.
|
why not a '69 chevelle? they can be had for a lot cheaper than a '70
|
67 Camaro!!!
never been a big chevelle fan, always thought they were too bloated (esp. when comparing the rear to the front) 66 chevelle though...........that i'd rock the **** out of! |
1st gen Camaros are cool. '69 is the year to have resale value wise though.
I love '70 Chevelles, my buddies dad just sold a mint one hes had for years. Needed to be painted, but it sold in a matter of hours @ $10k on craigslist. He was getting calls for weeks, then we found it posted up on the internet for like $17k or something rediculous. I think I'd rather go '69 Camaro. Yeah they've been done before, but the aftermarket is crazy for them. It would be a lot of fun to build one nicely. |
2 Attachment(s)
I've owned 3 '69 Camaro's over the years, and can tell you that they do not ride nearly as well as a '70-'72 Chevelle does, since the Chevelle has a full frame under it (while the Camaro doesn't).
I have two Chevelles now, a '69 and a '70, and think you should consider a '69 as well if you like that body style. Here's a few pictures of my cars. Attachment 498925 Attachment 498926 |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by HotRodGuy
(Post 1704187)
67 Camaro!!!
never been a big chevelle fan, always thought they were too bloated (esp. when comparing the rear to the front) 66 chevelle though...........that i'd rock the **** out of! 66 Chevelle; like this one we did?? :D Attachment 498924 |
id go with the camaro.. i think in the long run the camaro will always be worth more when done being redone and they look better
|
Originally Posted by evsmotors
(Post 1706502)
We have a bad ass '67 Camaro coming up!
66 Chevelle; like this one we did?? :D http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l2...e/IMG_6420.jpg |
From a pure performance standpoint, the Camaro is far lighter to begin with. So automatically you have superior power/weight ratio, more nimble handling, etc.
I may be biased :) |
Originally Posted by Memphis
(Post 1721780)
Missing some trim there
|
Its missing the part above the the grill, you meant to do that?
|
LOL, that piece wasn't installed because of the after market fiberglass hood. It was left up to the owner if he wanted installed. Now I know what you mean. Sorry. I thought you mean the wheel wells because they didn't want the trims installed.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands