2013 Boxster S 3.4L engine detuned from 350hp?

Subscribe
Oct 4, 2012 | 06:15 AM
  #31  
Quote: If you know Porsche, you know they have a history of understating the performance numbers (0-60 times, etc). That being said, you are right, the great evaluator is the dyno, but understand that the dyno measure HP at the rear wheel; but HP claims by all manufacturers are stated as HP ratings at the crank, which as any informed tuner will tell you is about 20 or so HP more than at the rear wheel, so a claimed 315 on the Box S and a rear wheel of 290-295 as you suggest, would entirely be a credible HP claim.
Some grossly exaggerate figures, or round off. It's not always a game of crank vs. rwhp in consideration to driveline loss. NA engines seem to be the least on target with marketing departments. But fine by me as I'm not looking for the highest number for some sort of bragging rights. The power is adequate, and more power comes at the expense of fuel and reliability.

Whatever the power is of the 981 S it's more than enough, especially considering where you drive it. I lived in Germany through 2009 and there power mattered a bit. In the US, not so much. I can't keep my wheels from spinning with the power I have now in the lower gears and not even under max acceleration. Why would I want more?
Reply
Oct 4, 2012 | 06:25 AM
  #32  
Quote: I lived in Germany through 2009 and there power mattered a bit. In the US, not so much. Why would I want more?
Well said....


Mark
Reply
Oct 4, 2012 | 06:30 AM
  #33  
i have NEVER had too much power
Reply
Subscribe