Ferrari Discussion on everything Ferrari related; F40, F50, Enzo, F430, Testarossa, to the Ferrari 599, 458

Ferrari CALIFORNIA: first official IMAGES

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #31  
lilstan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 551
From: san francisco
Rep Power: 42
lilstan is infamous around these parts
I like it, i think it looks really good
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #32  
BeastRides101's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 184
From: NC
Rep Power: 25
BeastRides101 is infamous around these parts
Seen better. Can't be the 550 for looks IMO
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #33  
Dirty-D's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 344
From: The Frosty White North
Rep Power: 40
Dirty-D is a splendid one to beholdDirty-D is a splendid one to beholdDirty-D is a splendid one to beholdDirty-D is a splendid one to beholdDirty-D is a splendid one to beholdDirty-D is a splendid one to beholdDirty-D is a splendid one to behold
As others have already expressed, i LOVE that front fascia and side profile aswell.
The crease that begins with the vents and extends over the hips of the car adds such a feeling of dynamics to it...I love it.
The wheels are rather boring, and i'd have to see more direct rear shots before i totally judged it...
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #34  
4retr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 136
From: So Cal
Rep Power: 24
4retr is infamous around these parts
I can't believe I'm saying this (Multiple Ferrari owner since the 90"s) - Am I the only one seeing a Honda S2000. I prefer the latest Maserati - Better yet I'll just focus adding a Stradale.
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #35  
stradaONE8's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 306
From: Ohio
Rep Power: 33
stradaONE8 is a jewel in the roughstradaONE8 is a jewel in the roughstradaONE8 is a jewel in the rough
Don't like the back or the front on first impression all that much...they don't match to me...
From dead side profile it looks good, but not great.
Then again, I didn't like the 430 aesthetically, but the Scuderia front changed the whole car...so who knows...hopefully a bit more tweaking will refine it.
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:14 PM
  #36  
///M Kevin's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,403
From: Bay Area, Ca
Rep Power: 123
///M Kevin is a splendid one to behold///M Kevin is a splendid one to behold///M Kevin is a splendid one to behold///M Kevin is a splendid one to behold///M Kevin is a splendid one to behold///M Kevin is a splendid one to behold///M Kevin is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by 4retr
I can't believe I'm saying this (Multiple Ferrari owner since the 90"s) - Am I the only one seeing a Honda S2000. I prefer the latest Maserati - Better yet I'll just focus adding a Stradale.

How do you see a S2000 by looking at this car? Is it the convertible factor?
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #37  
invids's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 243
From: socal
Rep Power: 30
invids is infamous around these parts
ferrari has gone insane...
 
Old May 14, 2008 | 07:57 AM
  #38  
revengerocket's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
From: Miami
Rep Power: 20
revengerocket is infamous around these parts
What the hell is this, a rejected design for the Maserati GranTurismo? It looks like one of those photoshops of spy pics where someone cuts and pastes design features from other models over the shape of a camoflauged test mule.

 
Old May 14, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #39  
GENERAL LEE's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 578
From: The 918/954
Rep Power: 45
GENERAL LEE is infamous around these parts
Sweet car. Finally a hardtop/conv. It's too bad the folks that are actually going to buy them love the car. It would be easier to get one if they shared the same thoughts as some of the critics on the net!
 

Last edited by GENERAL LEE; May 14, 2008 at 08:32 AM.
Old May 14, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #40  
Blazing's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 989
From: Belvedere CA,GreenWich CT,Frankfurt De
Rep Power: 59
Blazing is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by CURI0
Doesn't make sense, this is supposed to be the entry level car isn't it? At that price range why even bother just go with a 599.

I love it BTW, and the tips works much better on this than they do on the IS-F.
Its the entry level GT,not the entry level car (which is what the Dino will be when it released,after the brand new move expensive/powerful F430 is released). So basically think of the California as a F430 GT,just as the 599 is said to be the ENZO in GT form. Also the is faster yet less powerful than the F430,its a Hardtop Coupe and Convertible just like the M-Benz SL65,making it the most functional Ferrari to date. Everything on the cars is new,even the chassis is NOT based on the Maserati as previously thought.

As for 599 (An Enzo (F60) GT basicly),the 599 will remain much more expensive,most Used 599 cost $500,000 minimum,and new have paid over up to $200k over the Mrsp for new 599.
 
Old May 14, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #41  
CURI0's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,363
From: Malibu
Rep Power: 119
CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Blazing
Its the entry level GT,not the entry level car (which is what the Dino will be when it released,after the brand new move expensive/powerful F430 is released). So basically think of the California as a F430 GT,just as the 599 is said to be the ENZO in GT form. Also the is faster yet less powerful than the F430,its a Hardtop Coupe and Convertible just like the M-Benz SL65,making it the most functional Ferrari to date. Everything on the cars is new,even the chassis is NOT based on the Maserati as previously thought.

As for 599 (An Enzo (F60) GT basicly),the 599 will remain much more expensive,most Used 599 cost $500,000 minimum,and new have paid over up to $200k over the Mrsp for new 599.
I am talking about pricing based on MSRP first of all.

Second, this car was originally being developed as a Maserati. When they were officially split Ferrari kept the development for themselves. No matter how you slice it, it is basically the Maserati motor and platform tweaked by ferrari for themselves.

If they price this like an F430 I would rather have an F430, I guess we will have to wait and see.
 
Old May 14, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #42  
MeanMachine's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,733
From: Kuwait City,Kuwait
Rep Power: 334
MeanMachine is a glorious beacon of lightMeanMachine is a glorious beacon of lightMeanMachine is a glorious beacon of lightMeanMachine is a glorious beacon of lightMeanMachine is a glorious beacon of light
Originally Posted by CURI0
I am talking about pricing based on MSRP first of all.

Second, this car was originally being developed as a Maserati. When they were officially split Ferrari kept the development for themselves. No matter how you slice it, it is basically the Maserati motor and platform tweaked by ferrari for themselves.

If they price this like an F430 I would rather have an F430, I guess we will have to wait and see.

Second that.
 
Old May 14, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #43  
H20SKIER's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,444
From: inside someone hot
Rep Power: 171
H20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by CURI0
I am talking about pricing based on MSRP first of all.

Second, this car was originally being developed as a Maserati. When they were officially split Ferrari kept the development for themselves. No matter how you slice it, it is basically the Maserati motor and platform tweaked by ferrari for themselves.

Maserati has used the Ferrari Engine for years not the other way around. The QP's use a Ferrari Designed engine. The 360 shared the same exact engine with the Mas Coupes of the same era.
 
Old May 14, 2008 | 03:42 PM
  #44  
CURI0's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,363
From: Malibu
Rep Power: 119
CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by H20SKIER
Maserati has used the Ferrari Engine for years not the other way around. The QP's use a Ferrari Designed engine. The 360 shared the same exact engine with the Mas Coupes of the same era.
I believe you are a bit mistaken. The Maserati coupe of the same era had the ferrari influenced 4.2 liter motor but not with a flat-plane crank. Ferrari used the basic BLOCK for the engine in the F430 at which point they gave it a flat-plane crank and other tweaks. The 360 motor is not the same engine as the maserati coupe, you are wrong.

Ferrari never used the same engine that is in the coupe or QP or Gran Turismo, the 430 motor is a relative, albeit a distant one.
 
Old May 14, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #45  
H20SKIER's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,444
From: inside someone hot
Rep Power: 171
H20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud ofH20SKIER has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by CURI0
I believe you are a bit mistaken. The Maserati coupe of the same era had the ferrari influenced 4.2 liter motor but not with a flat-plane crank. Ferrari used the basic BLOCK for the engine in the F430 at which point they gave it a flat-plane crank and other tweaks. The 360 motor is not the same engine as the maserati coupe, you are wrong.

Ferrari never used the same engine that is in the coupe or QP or Gran Turismo, the 430 motor is a relative, albeit a distant one.
the 430's I never thought were the same but that 360 to Mas Coupe might as well be the same. They do look different. Driving the 360 and the Mas Coupe of that era you couldn't tell the difference. I believe the Mas Coupe had much better torque and that's what kept it up with my coupe but engines I don't know. The crank you talk about could very well be the reason it feels like more torque. Weren't they the same horsepower? My mechanics know my engines I just know the handling.

I'll be the first to tell you that I've spent many hours behind the wheels of these cars but not 2 minutes under the actual hood. What would my poor Dealership do than.

Thanks for the info. I just don't like these guys stating that this is going to be a Mas with Ferrari badging.

Ferrari needs a coupe (though sales aren't slow) that they sell to Females. This is the car and when I get the chance to order one I can't wait for my girlfriend to have whatever color she wants. She's smokin and in this car she will be so sexy. I can't wait to put this one in her garage.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 PM.