Which would you take - murci roadster or cgt?
Originally posted by elduderino
This coming from the guy whos waiting for his CGT...
This coming from the guy whos waiting for his CGT...
The Gallardo looks like a POS compared to the Murci. #1 is it much smaller, it looks scrunched, it doesn't have the presence. #2 it has a typical boring German interior based on the Audi A8, which the Murcielago does not.
CGT vs Murcielago, definetly the Murcielago. More practical, better looking x10, overall I think it is the better choice. From a performance stand point I would go with the CGT.
CGT vs Murcielago, definetly the Murcielago. More practical, better looking x10, overall I think it is the better choice. From a performance stand point I would go with the CGT.
Last edited by Ferrarislave; Aug 27, 2005 at 09:49 PM.
Originally posted by chidoks
the murcielago looks overweight and bulky.. i personally would pick the gallardo over the murcielago.. and i'd definitely pick the carrera gt over the murcielago
the murcielago looks overweight and bulky.. i personally would pick the gallardo over the murcielago.. and i'd definitely pick the carrera gt over the murcielago
Tough choice. Having seen them both I am definetly leaning towards the Barchetta based on looks alone. But due to it's superior engineering the CGT would be the car of choice. If all goes as planned I'll pick up a CGT in about a year. Handling + insane V10 = me likey
TTRon
TTRon
After just spending 1 week driving my Diablo, then my Murci and my buddies Gallardo, i have to say they are all awesome. The DIablo is the most involved to drive, but after several hours in it, getting into my Murci was like getting into a Benz, much more comfortable, easier to drive, and runs great. Bone stock, first gear roll on against a Gallardo with full exhaust, intake and Digitec reprogrammed ECU, it still won. I also spent several hours driving that same Gallardo, and it is awesome. Much smaller, easier to run through traffic, and pulls strong. I loved the Gallardo.
As for the CGT, it is definately quicker, but it is ugly, and not worth the money. Id much rather have a Gt2 tht has been worked. That is a real Porsche.If both the Cgt and the Murci Coupe were the same price, id still get the Murci. Im not a roadster kind of guy.
As for the CGT, it is definately quicker, but it is ugly, and not worth the money. Id much rather have a Gt2 tht has been worked. That is a real Porsche.If both the Cgt and the Murci Coupe were the same price, id still get the Murci. Im not a roadster kind of guy.
Last edited by allanlambo; Aug 29, 2005 at 01:11 PM.
i would not go for tha lambo mainly cause the Murcis will get new engines and a facelift next year...
I still think the Murci is soooo much more exotic than the CGT...
For some reason, the CGT already looks dated to me.....Enzoe, SLR and Murci still look more like supercars...Might be because the styling on CGT is more conseevative
I still think the Murci is soooo much more exotic than the CGT...
For some reason, the CGT already looks dated to me.....Enzoe, SLR and Murci still look more like supercars...Might be because the styling on CGT is more conseevative
Originally posted by msindi
For some reason, the CGT already looks dated to me.....Enzoe, SLR and Murci still look more like supercars...Might be because the styling on CGT is more conseevative
For some reason, the CGT already looks dated to me.....Enzoe, SLR and Murci still look more like supercars...Might be because the styling on CGT is more conseevative
Chuck
Allan, post a picture of your Mucie, for side by side comparisons if you wouldn't mind. And as for the CGT looking "terrible"? I think you've lost your mind, or own stock in Lamborghini.
Dated was the wrong word i guess....I just think carz like the Enzo, Murci, SLR are more exotic/radical in their look...MO of course
Dont get me wrong, I would buy a CGT over an SLR any day....
Dont get me wrong, I would buy a CGT over an SLR any day....





