6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource

6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/)
-   Panamera (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/panamera-75/)
-   -   Performance Data for G.I.A.C. Panamera Turbo Software from AWE Tuning (https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/panamera/254454-performance-data-g-i-c-panamera-turbo-software-awe-tuning.html)

Chris/AWE 09-08-2011 10:34 AM

Performance Data for G.I.A.C. Panamera Turbo Software from AWE Tuning
 
Hi everyone,

We recently finished a round of testing with G.I.A.C.’s Panamera Turbo Performance Software. These are some serious results, people!

All tests were performed on a 100% stock 2010 Porsche Panamera Turbo. The only change made to the car between the runs was the addition of G.I.A.C.’s 93 octane Performance Software.

Crank power.

We recorded peak power gains of +93hp and +82tq at the crank with healthy improvements throughout the powerband.

http://www.awe-tuning.com/media/dyno...mera_turbo.jpg

Down at the wheels:

G.I.A.C.’s Performance Software unlocked an additional +73 wheel hp and +38 wheel at the power peaks.

http://www.awe-tuning.com/media/dyno...mera_turbo.jpg

Where the rubber hits the road:

Acceleration, both 0-60mph and 0-100mph, is vastly improved with the new software.

From a standing start, the 0-60mph times saw a 1.03 second improvement!

The car wasn’t subjected to a high rpm launch, so the numbers are more representative of real world gains that you are likely to see with your own car.

http://www.awe-tuning.com/media/acce...urbo_accel.jpg

If 93hp is still not enough for you (of course, we understand), check out the soon-to-be-released Panamera Turbo Touring and Track Exhausts – get on the list to find out first.

jyupitt1 09-08-2011 08:30 PM

Looking forward to see the test results on the 4s.

cvprez 09-09-2011 07:32 AM

Am I reading these graphs correctly? You show the stock turbo running 0-60 in 5.68 seconds? That's 2 seconds slower than most magazines are achieving - even your modified time is over 1 second slower. I was expecting to see this car in the low 3 sec range.

Chris/AWE 09-09-2011 11:32 AM


Originally Posted by cvprez (Post 3309602)
Am I reading these graphs correctly? You show the stock turbo running 0-60 in 5.68 seconds? That's 2 seconds slower than most magazines are achieving - even your modified time is over 1 second slower. I was expecting to see this car in the low 3 sec range.

Magazines do hail mary abusive launches at minim weight on cold days. We did not do that.

The point of this graph is to show what a normal driver under normal conditions can achieve. Simply put the car in drive and mash the gas pedal. Nothing fancy.

The car had a 250lb driver, was full weight wit hall fluids and was subject to a normal street launch.

jyupitt1 09-09-2011 11:44 AM

did you guys use launch control?

MIA997TTBeast 09-09-2011 12:07 PM


Originally Posted by jyupitt1 (Post 3309827)
did you guys use launch control?

Read post above you... No they didnt...

Now to AWE, why the no launch control? Too much stress on the car with the extra HP. Is it safe to launch the car with the extra HP say at the strip like 5 times in a row. Should we be concerned in launching the car?

Chris/AWE 09-09-2011 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by jyupitt1 (Post 3309827)
did you guys use launch control?


Originally Posted by MIA997TTBeast (Post 3309865)
Read post above you... No they didnt...

Now to AWE, why the no launch control? Too much stress on the car with the extra HP. Is it safe to launch the car with the extra HP say at the strip like 5 times in a row. Should we be concerned in launching the car?

We did not use launch control.

The reason being is that all testing was done on a client vehicle and we didn't want to abuse it.

That being said the results, even without abuse, speak for themselves.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:08 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands