6speedonline's official 60-130, 1/4 Mile, and Standing Mile list
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,873
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Rep Power: 580
Originally Posted by VRAlexander
, then I will do the Michael Jordan 'nothing but net' into my garbage can!
Thanks again for your time and diligence in analysing my files...
Thanks again for your time and diligence in analysing my files...
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,726
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 416
Scotty slc just used my Dbox to see how his car runs......and it runs very well
He was just interested in 60-130 and did three runs:
Run 1 60-130 9.52 sec in 1397.37ft
Run 2 60-130 9.29 sec in 1360.92ft
Run 3 60-130 8.76 sec in 1286.09ft w/1shift
Congrats on a strong 510..Kevin
some graphs are posted in the 60-130 thread
He was just interested in 60-130 and did three runs:Run 1 60-130 9.52 sec in 1397.37ft
Run 2 60-130 9.29 sec in 1360.92ft
Run 3 60-130 8.76 sec in 1286.09ft w/1shift
Congrats on a strong 510..Kevin
some graphs are posted in the 60-130 thread
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,753
From: North Scottsdale, AZ
Rep Power: 114
EVOMS 997TT Stage I ran 11.3 @ 124 today. Here's the video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...16481040&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...16481040&hl=en
It ran 1.65 60ft. no wonder....
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Originally Posted by RennTechV12
I think that the fact that it's fast as hell has something to do with it also.
kinda makes sense...
markski
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 790
Originally Posted by Jean
Based on this trap speed, this car must be putting down about 620+FWHP with only an ECU tune up and little more, if compared with the slightly lighter stage 4 996TT that you ran.....Great run.
My calculator tells me it needs around 475 AWHP to trap 124.9. That puts it at around 565 FWHP or so.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hi guys...time to put up another number...I had a friend over the other night that was interested in how the AX-22 was working...so naturally we went for a spin in the turbo...My Toyo's are bald on the 18's, so I swapped to the 19inch HRE's with the P Zeros about a month ago that have been in the garage for the past two years...Its nice to change the look of the car every so often 
...
We made several 100-200mph passes and a quarter mile pass that was datalogged...unfortunantly I could only run 1.3bar on the car because of the traction issues of the 19inch rims and P Zeros...we got back to the house and downloaded the data...the Quartemile pass was a 11.6 at 141mph and an extrapolated 5.9 60-130mph (2shifts)...I emailed the file to Jean and he gave it a clean thumbs up! So for now, I like to share the 5.9 60-130mph(with two peolpe and 1.3bar of boost) and have Scott added to the list....this run was 2 seconds slower than my fastest 60-130mph....the 3.84second 60-130mph (boost control at 2.0bar and only one shift) record that I made for myself has a GPS data issue with the AX-22....everytime I turn up the boost on the car (and or powershift), the AX-22 has trouble logging the GPS data!!! So the only way to get a proper log is to run the car at 1.3bar and granny shift through the gears....Thanks Jean for your expert HELP in understanding this unit and crunching all the numbers....
... We made several 100-200mph passes and a quarter mile pass that was datalogged...unfortunantly I could only run 1.3bar on the car because of the traction issues of the 19inch rims and P Zeros...we got back to the house and downloaded the data...the Quartemile pass was a 11.6 at 141mph and an extrapolated 5.9 60-130mph (2shifts)...I emailed the file to Jean and he gave it a clean thumbs up! So for now, I like to share the 5.9 60-130mph(with two peolpe and 1.3bar of boost) and have Scott added to the list....this run was 2 seconds slower than my fastest 60-130mph....the 3.84second 60-130mph (boost control at 2.0bar and only one shift) record that I made for myself has a GPS data issue with the AX-22....everytime I turn up the boost on the car (and or powershift), the AX-22 has trouble logging the GPS data!!! So the only way to get a proper log is to run the car at 1.3bar and granny shift through the gears....Thanks Jean for your expert HELP in understanding this unit and crunching all the numbers....
Last edited by VRAlexander; Nov 29, 2006 at 12:59 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 350
From: Philly, Pa
Rep Power: 36
Originally Posted by VRAlexander
Hi guys...time to put up another number...I had a friend over the other night that was interested in how the AX-22 was working...so naturally we went for a spin in the turbo...My Toyo's are bald on the 18's, so I swapped to the 19inch HRE's with the P Zeros about a month ago that have been in the garage for the past two years...Its nice to change the look of the car every so often ...
We made several 100-200mph passes and a quarter mile pass that was datalogged...unfortunantly I could only run 1.3bar on the car because of the traction issues of the 19inch rims and P Zeros...we got back to the house and downloaded the data...the Quartemile pass was a 11.6 at 141mph and an extrapolated 5.9 60-130mph (2shifts)...I emailed the file to Jean and he gave it a clean thumbs up! So for now, I like to share the 5.9 60-130mph(with two peolpe and 1.3bar of boost) and have Scott added to the list....this run was 2 seconds slower than my fastest 60-130mph....the 3.84second 60-130mph (boost control at 2.0bar and only one shift) record that I made for myself has a GPS data issue with the AX-22....everytime I turn up the boost on the car (and or powershift), the AX-22 has trouble logging the GPS data!!! So the only way to get a proper log is to run the car at 1.3bar and granny shift through the gears....Thanks Jean for your expert HELP in understanding this unit and crunching all the numbers....
... We made several 100-200mph passes and a quarter mile pass that was datalogged...unfortunantly I could only run 1.3bar on the car because of the traction issues of the 19inch rims and P Zeros...we got back to the house and downloaded the data...the Quartemile pass was a 11.6 at 141mph and an extrapolated 5.9 60-130mph (2shifts)...I emailed the file to Jean and he gave it a clean thumbs up! So for now, I like to share the 5.9 60-130mph(with two peolpe and 1.3bar of boost) and have Scott added to the list....this run was 2 seconds slower than my fastest 60-130mph....the 3.84second 60-130mph (boost control at 2.0bar and only one shift) record that I made for myself has a GPS data issue with the AX-22....everytime I turn up the boost on the car (and or powershift), the AX-22 has trouble logging the GPS data!!! So the only way to get a proper log is to run the car at 1.3bar and granny shift through the gears....Thanks Jean for your expert HELP in understanding this unit and crunching all the numbers....
3.84 60-130
WOW!!!! I can't imagine..... I ran a 8.66 and though it was pretty fast....
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,163
From: Earth
Rep Power: 92
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
My calculator tells me it needs around 475 AWHP to trap 124.9. That puts it at around 565 FWHP or so.
VRAlex,
I know you understand that 1) being a Protomotive car and 2) the fastest run, I need to be more thorough with you than with any other, for obvious reasons.
This 5.9s. 2 shift run is 100% good. Damn, you got me thinking of upping my boost now
Re. your quartermile run, 11.6seconds@141mph tells the whole story! (BTW lousy 60ft in 2.6s and 0-60mph in 4.25s. !) The car has been loosing traction throughout. Still makes it the fastest trap for a 996TT.
Congratulations!
Last edited by Jean; Nov 29, 2006 at 04:29 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,753
From: North Scottsdale, AZ
Rep Power: 114
Originally Posted by Jean
Scott thanks, then the Stage 4 EVOMS must be 540FWHP or so? Same good driver and a bit lighter car than the 997TT, yet trapped a bit slower.. It is advertised at 610FWHP though.
VRAlex,
I know you understand that 1) being a Protomotive car and 2) the fastest run, I need to be more thorough with you than with any other, for obvious reasons.
This 5.9s. 2 shift run is 100% good. Damn, you got me thinking of upping my boost now
Re. your quartermile run, 11.6seconds@141mph tells the whole story! (BTW lousy 60ft in 2.6s and 0-60mph in 4.25s. !) The car has been loosing traction throughout. Still makes it the fastest trap for a 996TT.
Congratulations!
VRAlex,
I know you understand that 1) being a Protomotive car and 2) the fastest run, I need to be more thorough with you than with any other, for obvious reasons.
This 5.9s. 2 shift run is 100% good. Damn, you got me thinking of upping my boost now
Re. your quartermile run, 11.6seconds@141mph tells the whole story! (BTW lousy 60ft in 2.6s and 0-60mph in 4.25s. !) The car has been loosing traction throughout. Still makes it the fastest trap for a 996TT.
Congratulations!