Questions on 930 vs. 964 turbo

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 11:13 PM
  #1  
ofishbein's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 80
From: So Cal
Rep Power: 22
ofishbein is infamous around these parts
Questions on 930 vs. 964 turbo

I am strongly considering buying a 930, but I noticed along the way that there are a lot of 964 turbo deals to be had out there. I originally stayed away from 964s because of their inherent faults (RMS, twin plug, and dual mass flywheel issue, etc.). Now, I'm wondering if there are enough significant differences between the turbo and non-turbo cars to warrant a look.

I know the 996 turbos uses a different engine than the M96 used in the non-turbo cars and I wondered if the same might be true of the 964 turbos. Does anyone know if the issues I described above are as prevalent in the 964 turbos as in the normally aspirated cars?
 
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
935K3's Avatar
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5
From: Montana
Rep Power: 0
935K3 is infamous around these parts
964 Turbo

Hi,
The 90 - 93 964 turbo still uses the original aircooled 3.3 turbo engine, then went over to the 3.6 M64 type, they have the G50/50 5 speed. The 1 to have is the 964 Turbo S but they only made a few. What ever you buy you are always going to have to face spending money on maybe a previous owners Lack of Maintenance or Care

Good luck.
 
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #3  
cibergypsy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 578
From: Florida
Rep Power: 44
cibergypsy is a jewel in the roughcibergypsy is a jewel in the roughcibergypsy is a jewel in the rough
I may be wrong, of course, but I think the 964 Turbo S was RoW and not for the USA. The Turbo 3.6 would be the one to have in the USA.

The first 964 Turbos had the 3.3L motor from the 930 with some alterations to make it have a bit more power.
 
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 07:19 PM
  #4  
dmundy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 109
From: Sugar Land, TX
Rep Power: 25
dmundy has a spectacular aura aboutdmundy has a spectacular aura aboutdmundy has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by cibergypsy
I may be wrong, of course, but I think the 964 Turbo S was RoW and not for the USA. The Turbo 3.6 would be the one to have in the USA.

The first 964 Turbos had the 3.3L motor from the 930 with some alterations to make it have a bit more power.
There were a handful of Turbo S's imported into the US. The are significantly more expensive than the standard Turbos.
 
Old Jan 1, 2010 | 01:52 PM
  #5  
TurboVR6's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 437
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 44
TurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud of
Do what I did, buy a 930 and make it look like a 964

930bumperside.jpg?t=1262378599
 
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 09:39 AM
  #6  
frabouden's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 73
From: South FLorida, USA
Rep Power: 19
frabouden is infamous around these parts
930 vs 964

suggest you go with the most recent car you can afford, all other things being equal, such as the shape the car is in.
 
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 10:09 AM
  #7  
BadP930's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 22
From: Burnt Hills, NY
Rep Power: 0
BadP930 is infamous around these parts
Smile Best choice

Not an expert on 964's, but took a 1992 964 Turbo out on test run and was sincerely disappointed. Car had Garret after-market turbo (owner did not know details) and could not hold a candle to my 930. Lunge when turbo kicks in didn't have that "set you back in your seat" feel that my 930 does. Several of my friends who have or who have driven or own 964 turbos have told me NEVER sell my 930; there is no equal. Steve
 
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 10:24 AM
  #8  
TurboVR6's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 437
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 44
TurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud ofTurboVR6 has much to be proud of
930 = Raw
965 = Refine

That being said that 92 you drove might not of been tuned right. My 91 pulls and runs great with just an aftermarket exhaust. My 930 was fast but I would have to give the edge to the 965.

And yes don't sell your 930 Like I did They are the true Porsche Turbo
 
Old Jan 2, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #9  
7seven's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 50
From: nanaimo
Rep Power: 0
7seven is infamous around these parts7seven is infamous around these parts7seven is infamous around these parts7seven is infamous around these parts7seven is infamous around these parts7seven is infamous around these parts
well i had an 86 930 and now have a 91 965. I much prefer the 965 as it handles 10x better with coils , has strong ABS brakes, better ac, power steering that has a ton of feel , a 5 speed tranny, a better k27 turbo, and the same reliable 3.3 litre motor. The 930 was fun for about a half hour .But i take my 965 on business trips that can take 2 days and personally think its the right blend of comfort and character.
 
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 11:43 AM
  #10  
2genT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 19
From: socal
Rep Power: 0
2genT is infamous around these parts
Cool

Ditto to the 930 owners,,,I'm still driving my 79, still turn heads.. will be classic someday..
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PelicanParts.com
930 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 20, 2015 03:11 PM
PelicanParts.com
964
0
Aug 18, 2015 03:57 PM
PelicanParts.com
964 Turbo
0
Aug 18, 2015 03:56 PM
PelicanParts.com
993 Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 18, 2015 03:55 PM
PelicanParts.com
993 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 18, 2015 03:55 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 PM.