The ByDesign/Cobb Stage3 Results and the Precision Fit by ATXAutosport on the Install
#16
Sept 30th 2015
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers and IPD Plenum in sport plus --- 475whp and 519ftlpb tq
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers, IPD Plenum and FVD Piggyback in Sport Plus --- 494whp and 557ftlb tq
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers IPD Plenum and Stage 1 Cobb --- 493whp and 604ftlb tq
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers, IPD Plenum and Stage 2 Cobb -- 512whp and 625ftlb tq
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers, IPD Plenum and Custom Cobb Tune -- 524whp and 651ftlb tq
Oct 28 2015
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers IPD Plenum, IPD Y-Pipe, ByDesign ICs in Sport Plus --- 520whp and 557 ftlb tq
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers, IPD Plenum, IPD Y-Pipe, ByDesign ICs and ByDesign 93 octane OTS map --- 543whp and 633 ftlb tq
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers, IPD Plenum, IPD Y-Pipe ByDesign ICs and Cobb/ByDesign tweaked map 1 --- 553 whp and 635 ftlb tq
- FVD Exhaust, 200 cell cats, FVD Headers, IPD Plenum, IPD Y-Pipe, ByDesign ICs and Cobb/ByDesign tweaked map 2 --- maybe 563 whp and 646 ftlb tq
After adding Y-pipe and IC you never really got the same torque numbers. Any idea why? Clearly the COBB provided more HP and TQ than FVD module. And clearly the Y-pipe and IC helped get more HP. But why did the TQ decrease?
#17
At this point we have to back off on the torque John. But I am pretty sure his next run was going to be "the one" if it wasn't for that damn hose. Hopefully soon he'll get back on and verify. But it was headed in that direction before Eric let off.
#18
Originally Posted by SamboTT@ByDesign
At this point we have to back off on the torque John. But I am pretty sure his next run was going to be "the one" if it wasn't for that damn hose. Hopefully soon he'll get back on and verify. But it was headed in that direction before Eric let off.
#20
looks like the nitrous car stopped at 700ft/lbs and no problem
#21
Originally Posted by SamboTT@ByDesign
I have seen even stage 2's need to be tamed when custom tuned. Th IPD stuff makes them come on hard. We stay under 670-680 wheel.
A PDK build is something I won't do -- just too much cash.
#22
As one who is considering the VTG upgrade when it debuts if we are reaching the PDK's limits with full bolt ons, what benefit will upgrading the VTGs offer without doing a full PDK build? Is the advantage more whee horsepower even if we cannot safely increase the wheel torque beyond 670-680? I suppose if we can get wheel hp way up over FBO numbers the car would definitely go faster especially on top which is the car's weak point with the OEM VTGs. A PDK build is something I won't do -- just too much cash.
#23
SDG, expensive is relevant
#24
Originally Posted by ecpChris
+1, turbos will be more efficient.
SDG, expensive is relevant
SDG, expensive is relevant
What is the performance advantage if the bigger turbos end up putting out the same power as an FBO car with OEM VTGs?
Seems to me, however, that the upgraded VTGs will add horsepower beyond what the FBO/stock turbo cars can do even if the torque has to be capped at levels the FBO cars can achieve (absent a PDK build).
#25
Relevant or relative? A PDK build is a lot of cash from what I have been told.
What is the performance advantage if the bigger turbos end up putting out the same power as an FBO car with OEM VTGs?
Seems to me, however, that the upgraded VTGs will add horsepower beyond what the FBO/stock turbo cars can do even if the torque has to be capped at levels the FBO cars can achieve (absent a PDK build).
What is the performance advantage if the bigger turbos end up putting out the same power as an FBO car with OEM VTGs?
Seems to me, however, that the upgraded VTGs will add horsepower beyond what the FBO/stock turbo cars can do even if the torque has to be capped at levels the FBO cars can achieve (absent a PDK build).
You really don't need a PDK build unless you are going nuts, but I was busting chops. If you want that much power out of the car you'd prob want to do rods and PDK, which is a whole other ballgame. Now using meth you will be fine doing upgraded VTGs and not running into PDK issues
#26
Originally Posted by ecpChris
Arggh relative. Typing from my phone and I guess it autocorrected
You really don't need a PDK build unless you are going nuts, but I was busting chops. If you want that much power out of the car you'd prob want to do rods and PDK, which is a whole other ballgame. Now using meth you will be fine doing upgraded VTGs and not running into PDK issues
You really don't need a PDK build unless you are going nuts, but I was busting chops. If you want that much power out of the car you'd prob want to do rods and PDK, which is a whole other ballgame. Now using meth you will be fine doing upgraded VTGs and not running into PDK issues
Definitely do not want to spring for rods/PFK build.
I will stop at upgraded VTGs and am only interested in them if they confer a performance advantage over an FBO/stock turbo set up. If they can get us another 50-75 wheel hp that would work for me. That would get the car into the nines for sure.
#27
What is the performance advantage if the bigger turbos end up putting out the same power as an FBO car with OEM VTGs?
Seems to me, however, that the upgraded VTGs will add horsepower beyond what the FBO/stock turbo cars can do even if the torque has to be capped at levels the FBO cars can achieve (absent a PDK build).
Seems to me, however, that the upgraded VTGs will add horsepower beyond what the FBO/stock turbo cars can do even if the torque has to be capped at levels the FBO cars can achieve (absent a PDK build).
Of course, you can get all those benefits of bigger VTGs without tuning for the moon. Nothing says you HAVE to build a rocket. You could just tune at a lower boost and get much better safety margins at the same power level.
- Patrick
#28
First, thanks for all that effort. I realize that its one thing to stare at the graphs and come to your own conclusion, but another to communicate that to us in a useable format.
Above, on October 28, did you start the runs with a stock map in run #1? If so, that's a good bit of power on stock boost.
Thanks,
Chris
Above, on October 28, did you start the runs with a stock map in run #1? If so, that's a good bit of power on stock boost.
Thanks,
Chris
#29
Originally Posted by PMNewton
The advantage is that when the turbos aren't working as hard the IATs stay down. If you look at some of the 1,000 hp mustangs they are only running 17-19 psi because the bigger turbos flow more total air mass but at a lower pressure. You also get a better margin of safety on your engine internals because they aren't as stressed. You don't have to run as rich, you don't have to pull as much timing, etc. The downside is slightly more spool time but with VTGs it will just be slight.
Of course, you can get all those benefits of bigger VTGs without tuning for the moon. Nothing says you HAVE to build a rocket. You could just tune at a lower boost and get much better safety margins at the same power level.
- Patrick
Of course, you can get all those benefits of bigger VTGs without tuning for the moon. Nothing says you HAVE to build a rocket. You could just tune at a lower boost and get much better safety margins at the same power level.
- Patrick
#30
COTA Cancelled, it flooded like hell out there this morning and the track said no way for Sunday. They are giving us a makeup date by Tuesday. Oh well............
If it's clear I am going out to my favorite county road on Sunday with the Vbox.
If it's clear I am going out to my favorite county road on Sunday with the Vbox.