Do you have a radar detect /laser jam installed?
#16
Originally Posted by stealth.pilot
Unless this new Escort radar allows you to use ALP diffusers, don't bother.
#17
Originally Posted by enzom
Escort lost my business when they didn't update the software for their laser shifters for nearly two years. For all I know, they haven't updated them even after I switched to ALP shifters. If you aren't going to update software for new guns or to improve performance against existing guns, what good is the shifter. Sorry, Escort. You are waaaaaaaaay behind on laser countermeasures and need to demonstrate a commitment to updating software before I would ever use your shifters again.
Unless this new Escort radar allows you to use ALP diffusers, don't bother.
Unless this new Escort radar allows you to use ALP diffusers, don't bother.
#18
I don't want to jinx it but I have definitely been targeted by laser and was at 40 in a 30 limit and didn't even slow down, no ticket. 9500ci
My biggest complaint is the false K band alerts due to collision warning systems. I am thinking of getting a 360max and then in my next car, the equivalent built in.
My biggest complaint is the false K band alerts due to collision warning systems. I am thinking of getting a 360max and then in my next car, the equivalent built in.
#19
I have the Max II, which I purchased right before the launch of the Max 360. It has been great, and the TSR software works well to eliminate false alarms due to collision warning systems.
#20
I don't want to jinx it but I have definitely been targeted by laser and was at 40 in a 30 limit and didn't even slow down, no ticket. 9500ci
My biggest complaint is the false K band alerts due to collision warning systems. I am thinking of getting a 360max and then in my next car, the equivalent built in.
My biggest complaint is the false K band alerts due to collision warning systems. I am thinking of getting a 360max and then in my next car, the equivalent built in.
#21
It is very rare they would ticket someone for 40 in a 30 so I don't think it means anything. You know if you're really jamming successfully if you are doing 15-20 over. Also did you see the look on the guys face? You shouldn't jam all the way but if you do they typically look perplexed and start fiddling with the buttons on the gun.
On that laser incident though, we pulled into a parking lot not far behind the cop because that is where we were going. When I came out, he had some woman in a Lexus ES350 pulled over in the driveway giving her a ticket. He gave my car a hard stare when I pulled out, I am sure he saw the detector on the back since it's right over the plate. He surely could have seen the ones in the front if he knew what to look for but as he was otherwise generating revenue, he probably didn't care.
#22
My wife has the Net radar that ALP teamed up with. Seems to work fine, but I rarely drive her car.
#25
Go with the ALP but skip the Net Radar. It's not ready for primetime and the manufacturer support is lacking. They typically ignore my emails and questions, and there are several issues with the implementation which the manufacturer just doesn't get.
ALP is a solid product. For radar stick to Escort/Bel, or Stinger if you want to go all out.
ALP is a solid product. For radar stick to Escort/Bel, or Stinger if you want to go all out.
#29
Actually this is not true on Net Radar. It is true for ALP.
Remember ALP and Net Radar are different companies. And this is part of the issue. ALP prioritized ALP updates, and fits in software for Net Radar in its spare time. And most people would agree with this prioritization. However it nevertheless means that the radar side gets shortchanged, in a way that it would not be shortchanged at say Radenso.
There are several area this product has been disappointing:
1) The lockouts feature is pathetic. It barely works and you have to lock out the same source multiple times from different directions. In addition there is no auto lockout, and while he does have a feature that blocks all K band alerts along a route, that feature will unlock the same ones it blocked if you drive the same route twice. This is very poor design. Valentine, Escort, and Stinger all have a functional auto lockout function, Net Radar does not.
2) The entire system is highly dependent on using a phone app: You need to use a phone to be able to access lockouts as well as detailed visual alerts because there is no display. However if you use a phone then it won't send alerts to the external speaker, only to the phone's speaker which isn't loud enough for a performance car. This has been an issue for a while and several people have raised it but he just sweeps it under the carpet. Again this shouldn't be complicated - Escort and Valentine know how to use both a system external speaker and a phone speaker at same time, why can't Net Radar?
3) For Android users there is no option of HFP alerts (using Bluetooth protocol to simulate a call over car speakers). This is an Android limitation but it underscores the idiocy of not enabling simultaneous use of the external speaker with the phone speaker.
4) He sold people front and rear antennas since June, but he hasn't issued an update for the Arrows. So when you encounter a radar threat it alerts forever because it can't filter it out once you pass it since it isn't assessing direction, and you can't tell if you passed it because no arrows.
5) The range isn't exactly spectacular. In fact it is usually the weakest of the installed detectors. Look at the attached chart and you will see what I mean. It is beaten by Stinger, 9500CI, STIR+ and Radenso HD+. When you consider the escort is a 9 year old product, this is unimpressive.
The issue is the owner of Net Electronics who is also the US distributor of Antilaser is a guy who doesn't accept feedback. If you look at most forum posts, where someone raises an issue, his response is often to convince them there is no issue or to say the issue is unimportant and not worth prioritizing. My personal feeling is been that he:
1) Takes the position that he is always right and the customer is always wrong whenever you attempt to give feedback. For instance to have smart control of the system (e.g. Lockouts) you need a phone interface. But if you use Android you can't use an external speaker which makes alerts impossible to hear if your playing music. It you use iOS you will find the support is limited and updates are lagged by a few months.
2) He doesn't prioritize the radar product development relative to the lidar which means the NetRadar feels like an unsupported product. While the underlying issue may be he has difficulty influencing Antilaser's app development I find that he himself seems to downplay the priority of radar updates.
3) He is downright abrasive. When I raised issues with the product he instructed moderators on the radar forum to shut down my feedback. I assume he has the moderators on his side due to financial incentives such as product discounts. However this behavior in itself underscores his contempt for customers.
4) BTW He had a conflict with the owners of 6Speed because when he was a sponsor he didn't want to respond to PMs. In the end he ended up dropping 6Speed sponsorship because he wouldn't accept the rules.
Remember ALP and Net Radar are different companies. And this is part of the issue. ALP prioritized ALP updates, and fits in software for Net Radar in its spare time. And most people would agree with this prioritization. However it nevertheless means that the radar side gets shortchanged, in a way that it would not be shortchanged at say Radenso.
There are several area this product has been disappointing:
1) The lockouts feature is pathetic. It barely works and you have to lock out the same source multiple times from different directions. In addition there is no auto lockout, and while he does have a feature that blocks all K band alerts along a route, that feature will unlock the same ones it blocked if you drive the same route twice. This is very poor design. Valentine, Escort, and Stinger all have a functional auto lockout function, Net Radar does not.
2) The entire system is highly dependent on using a phone app: You need to use a phone to be able to access lockouts as well as detailed visual alerts because there is no display. However if you use a phone then it won't send alerts to the external speaker, only to the phone's speaker which isn't loud enough for a performance car. This has been an issue for a while and several people have raised it but he just sweeps it under the carpet. Again this shouldn't be complicated - Escort and Valentine know how to use both a system external speaker and a phone speaker at same time, why can't Net Radar?
3) For Android users there is no option of HFP alerts (using Bluetooth protocol to simulate a call over car speakers). This is an Android limitation but it underscores the idiocy of not enabling simultaneous use of the external speaker with the phone speaker.
4) He sold people front and rear antennas since June, but he hasn't issued an update for the Arrows. So when you encounter a radar threat it alerts forever because it can't filter it out once you pass it since it isn't assessing direction, and you can't tell if you passed it because no arrows.
5) The range isn't exactly spectacular. In fact it is usually the weakest of the installed detectors. Look at the attached chart and you will see what I mean. It is beaten by Stinger, 9500CI, STIR+ and Radenso HD+. When you consider the escort is a 9 year old product, this is unimpressive.
The issue is the owner of Net Electronics who is also the US distributor of Antilaser is a guy who doesn't accept feedback. If you look at most forum posts, where someone raises an issue, his response is often to convince them there is no issue or to say the issue is unimportant and not worth prioritizing. My personal feeling is been that he:
1) Takes the position that he is always right and the customer is always wrong whenever you attempt to give feedback. For instance to have smart control of the system (e.g. Lockouts) you need a phone interface. But if you use Android you can't use an external speaker which makes alerts impossible to hear if your playing music. It you use iOS you will find the support is limited and updates are lagged by a few months.
2) He doesn't prioritize the radar product development relative to the lidar which means the NetRadar feels like an unsupported product. While the underlying issue may be he has difficulty influencing Antilaser's app development I find that he himself seems to downplay the priority of radar updates.
3) He is downright abrasive. When I raised issues with the product he instructed moderators on the radar forum to shut down my feedback. I assume he has the moderators on his side due to financial incentives such as product discounts. However this behavior in itself underscores his contempt for customers.
4) BTW He had a conflict with the owners of 6Speed because when he was a sponsor he didn't want to respond to PMs. In the end he ended up dropping 6Speed sponsorship because he wouldn't accept the rules.
Last edited by stealth.pilot; 01-08-2017 at 04:55 PM.
#30
I don't dispute your claim but the product is still relatively new (and does need work) and at least it's a NA product.
Unfortunately there really isn't anything much better at this time..until it gets some needed upgrades (or Stinger gets its act together), and one wants to utilize ALP it's the best pairing option.....
Unfortunately there really isn't anything much better at this time..until it gets some needed upgrades (or Stinger gets its act together), and one wants to utilize ALP it's the best pairing option.....