Sunday NY Times
The 996 and 997 are two generations, not one, and they span more than a decade. Could there be a significant enough difference between the 996/997 vs the prior generations for someone to claim that the 996/997 aren't true 911s? Sure, but I've only heard that claim made based on change to a water-cooled engine, not a fundamental qualitative change in the driving dynamics.
As I said before, those driving dynamics relate mainly to how the car pitches and rolls, along with steering feel, etc. No other car I've driven has those characteristics the way the 996/997 do, and that includes the 991 (and Boxster, Cayman, Panamera, etc.). Plenty of other people who've driven older 911 generations agree with me (though some don't).
You seem determined to claim that the 991 is a true 911 but, again, why does it matter? Don't you love your car either way? And what does it matter if you and I don't agree on whether it's a true 911? 'True 911' is a fuzzy set, and people have different criteria in defining it. I focus on things that some people apparently hardly care about, and vice versa.
Addendum: And to follow your reasoning, if an owner of a 993 or older generation adamantly tells me that my 997 isn't a true 911, even if the reason is a difference in the driving dynamics, I don't really have no problem with that. The 997 (and 996) still offer something I haven't found in other cars, including the 991, and I love them for it. I identify those traits with the 911, as do countless other people, but in the end '911' is just a name. It's the car that matters.
As I said before, those driving dynamics relate mainly to how the car pitches and rolls, along with steering feel, etc. No other car I've driven has those characteristics the way the 996/997 do, and that includes the 991 (and Boxster, Cayman, Panamera, etc.). Plenty of other people who've driven older 911 generations agree with me (though some don't).
You seem determined to claim that the 991 is a true 911 but, again, why does it matter? Don't you love your car either way? And what does it matter if you and I don't agree on whether it's a true 911? 'True 911' is a fuzzy set, and people have different criteria in defining it. I focus on things that some people apparently hardly care about, and vice versa.
Addendum: And to follow your reasoning, if an owner of a 993 or older generation adamantly tells me that my 997 isn't a true 911, even if the reason is a difference in the driving dynamics, I don't really have no problem with that. The 997 (and 996) still offer something I haven't found in other cars, including the 991, and I love them for it. I identify those traits with the 911, as do countless other people, but in the end '911' is just a name. It's the car that matters.
And I am particularly unhappy with those who would express a negative opinion, as opposed to fact, and are fundementally uninformed enough to do it. The 996 and the 997 are the same great car, with evolutionary updates and different front lenses. Using the differences between them as a yard stick to measure changes in driver's dynamic is absurd. To borrow from theater, it is like calling an Ox a Bull. He is happy for the complement, but would rather have restored what was rightfully his!

If you don't like the 991 fine. If you don't like people questioning the wisdom of buying the last of the 997.2s when a brand new car is on the way, I can understand your concern. If you feel left out now that all the attention has shifted to the 991 and yours is just the last run of the last version of a good car, I feel your pain. But those insecurities are your problem. You bought a great car. Move on.
If you don't like fly-by-wire steering OK (but almost everyone, including, I think, the 997 has been fly by wire throttle control for some time and I don't here anyone saying that that makes the car less of an anything - but it truly feels differnt than direct linkages used to). We can debate that all day long and that is just fine. If you think the 991 is the next Edsel, we can debate that too, preferably over a beer but only one - I am driving). Time and sales numbers will tell in retrospect, but we can good naturedly argue about that 'til the cows come home.
But don't presume to appoint yourself judge for everyone on what is, what isn't and to what degee, something is a 911. It is not your place to question something you, by your own admission, know little or nothing about.
Again, you like the 997 better - great. For you. And, not for nothing, my firm and I do a great deal of trademark work for some very large and brand-savvy companies so you will never get me to agree that there is nothing in a name. I dare say, with the way Porsche gaurds its name and reputation, and with its prices so linked to both performance and image, you will not get much agreement out of them either. And feel free to call Coke, Disney and Apple if you need a greater sample size.
If truly, what is in a name, than why did you bring it up and raise that question? Why do you care if I call my car a 911 and why do you question my right, or Porsche', to do so? I am happy to call my car a Porsche, a Carrera, a 911, or a 991. You should be happy for me. And for yourself. If you want to say your 911 steers better than mine because it is hydrolic - have at it. But don't say my car is less of a 911 than yours. I do care!
And I am particularly unhappy with those who would express a negative opinion, as opposed to fact, and are fundementally uninformed enough to do it. The 996 and the 997 are the same great car, with evolutionary updates and different front lenses. Using the differences between them as a yard stick to measure changes in driver's dynamic is absurd. To borrow from theater, it is like calling an Ox a Bull. He is happy for the complement, but would rather have restored what was rightfully his!
If you don't like the 991 fine. If you don't like people questioning the wisdom of buying the last of the 997.2s when a brand new car is on the way, I can understand your concern. If you feel left out now that all the attention has shifted to the 991 and yours is just the last run of the last version of a good car, I feel your pain. But those insecurities are your problem. You bought a great car. Move on.
If you don't like fly-by-wire steering OK (but almost everyone, including, I think, the 997 has been fly by wire throttle control for some time and I don't here anyone saying that that makes the car less of an anything - but it truly feels differnt than direct linkages used to). We can debate that all day long and that is just fine. If you think the 991 is the next Edsel, we can debate that too, preferably over a beer but only one - I am driving). Time and sales numbers will tell in retrospect, but we can good naturedly argue about that 'til the cows come home.
But don't presume to appoint yourself judge for everyone on what is, what isn't and to what degee, something is a 911. It is not your place to question something you, by your own admission, know little or nothing about.
Again, you like the 997 better - great. For you.
And, not for nothing, my firm and I do a great deal of trademark work for some very large and brand-savvy companies so you will never get me to agree that there is nothing in a name. I dare say, with the way Porsche gaurds its name and reputation, and with its prices so linked to both performance and image, you will not get much agreement out of them either. And feel free to call Coke, Disney and Apple if you need a greater sample size.
And I am particularly unhappy with those who would express a negative opinion, as opposed to fact, and are fundementally uninformed enough to do it. The 996 and the 997 are the same great car, with evolutionary updates and different front lenses. Using the differences between them as a yard stick to measure changes in driver's dynamic is absurd. To borrow from theater, it is like calling an Ox a Bull. He is happy for the complement, but would rather have restored what was rightfully his!

If you don't like the 991 fine. If you don't like people questioning the wisdom of buying the last of the 997.2s when a brand new car is on the way, I can understand your concern. If you feel left out now that all the attention has shifted to the 991 and yours is just the last run of the last version of a good car, I feel your pain. But those insecurities are your problem. You bought a great car. Move on.
If you don't like fly-by-wire steering OK (but almost everyone, including, I think, the 997 has been fly by wire throttle control for some time and I don't here anyone saying that that makes the car less of an anything - but it truly feels differnt than direct linkages used to). We can debate that all day long and that is just fine. If you think the 991 is the next Edsel, we can debate that too, preferably over a beer but only one - I am driving). Time and sales numbers will tell in retrospect, but we can good naturedly argue about that 'til the cows come home.
But don't presume to appoint yourself judge for everyone on what is, what isn't and to what degee, something is a 911. It is not your place to question something you, by your own admission, know little or nothing about.
Again, you like the 997 better - great. For you. And, not for nothing, my firm and I do a great deal of trademark work for some very large and brand-savvy companies so you will never get me to agree that there is nothing in a name. I dare say, with the way Porsche gaurds its name and reputation, and with its prices so linked to both performance and image, you will not get much agreement out of them either. And feel free to call Coke, Disney and Apple if you need a greater sample size.
If you consider your 991 to be a 911, that's fine, and it's up to you. I'm glad that you love the car and consider it to be a 911. We're not really trying to settle a question which has an entirely objective answer, so different opinions are OK. And when I'm driving a 991 in a couple of years (base, GT3, Turbo?), feel free to make fun of how I had all these reservations back when the 991 first came out.
OTOH, if I recently got a 991 and was hearing lots of criticism of it, I might be inclined to second-guess my choice. Maybe we need a '991, Criticism Prohibited' section so that 991 owners don't have to hear this stuff which is of more interest to potential 991 owners. Seriously.
No insecurity here. I can get a 991 if I really want it. Question is whether I prefer it to the 997. That's all.
OTOH, if I recently got a 991 and was hearing lots of criticism of it, I might be inclined to second-guess my choice. Maybe we need a '991, Criticism Prohibited' section so that 991 owners don't have to hear this stuff which is of more interest to potential 991 owners. Seriously.
OTOH, if I recently got a 991 and was hearing lots of criticism of it, I might be inclined to second-guess my choice. Maybe we need a '991, Criticism Prohibited' section so that 991 owners don't have to hear this stuff which is of more interest to potential 991 owners. Seriously.
I must have missed something, or several somethings. I did not see or read anthing that would qualify as "lots of criticism." Indeed, if we use the article that started this thread, there are two pages of praise and two clauses of tepid. Some articles and posts like it and some don't. Some like it but like other cars better, either perfomance for the money (GT-R), styling (R8 - but I don't agree), exotic (458) or just wow (the new Lambo). All are as valid as any other opinion (except for the GT-R in terms of performance for the money - that is more factual). But, other than on this site, and at a reasonably low level, I have heard very little actual criticism.

No insecurity here. I can get a 991 if I really want it. Question is whether I prefer it to the 997. That's all.
OTOH, if I recently got a 991 and was hearing lots of criticism of it, I might be inclined to second-guess my choice. Maybe we need a '991, Criticism Prohibited' section so that 991 owners don't have to hear this stuff which is of more interest to potential 991 owners. Seriously.
OTOH, if I recently got a 991 and was hearing lots of criticism of it, I might be inclined to second-guess my choice. Maybe we need a '991, Criticism Prohibited' section so that 991 owners don't have to hear this stuff which is of more interest to potential 991 owners. Seriously.

You think a 991 owner starts a thread about a glowing review of that vehicle to attracted posts from individuals whom don't like the 991?
What you think we need the balance of your voice of "reason"...
There isn't another section which gets as much negative posts aimed at the designated model as the 991 section does... and make no mistake about it, nor would it be tolerated!
Why don't you try this on the 997 Turbo, 996 or GT-R section... see what happens.
I know, I know... I wasn't going to get involved.
Hahahaha... like you'd be able to stay away. 
You think a 991 owner starts a thread about a glowing review of that vehicle to attracted posts from individuals whom don't like the 991?
What you think we need the balance of your voice of "reason"...
There isn't another section which gets as much negative posts aimed at the designated model as the 991 section does... and make no mistake about it, nor would it be tolerated!
Why don't you try this on the 997 Turbo, 996 or GT-R section... see what happens.
I know, I know... I wasn't going to get involved.

You think a 991 owner starts a thread about a glowing review of that vehicle to attracted posts from individuals whom don't like the 991?
What you think we need the balance of your voice of "reason"...
There isn't another section which gets as much negative posts aimed at the designated model as the 991 section does... and make no mistake about it, nor would it be tolerated!
Why don't you try this on the 997 Turbo, 996 or GT-R section... see what happens.
I know, I know... I wasn't going to get involved.


Please review this thread from the beginning. The OP cited an article which praised the 991, but also raised questions about its departure from the 911 tradition and its potential lack of timelessness. I believe he did it in good faith, and expecting a discussion which will cover both positive and negative aspects of the car.
As far as negative comments in other sections, those cars are old news, so there won't be much of it. But sometimes negative points are mentioned, particularly when a potential buyer is asking for opinions. And you may see more of that when new Boxster and Cayman come out, if people are disappointed with some aspects of them. I hope not, since visually they're very compelling.
As far as negative comments in other sections, those cars are old news, so there won't be much of it. But sometimes negative points are mentioned, particularly when a potential buyer is asking for opinions. And you may see more of that when new Boxster and Cayman come out, if people are disappointed with some aspects of them. I hope not, since visually they're very compelling.
ChuckJ
I saw some comments along these lines noted in 6speed also. Can't remember which publication was cited, but comments were made about longer wheelbase, less lively dynamics, and more numb steering. Still a beautiful car though, so I'll remain hopeful until I drive it.
Last edited by Manifold; Apr 27, 2012 at 03:38 PM.
"This is the drop-top version of the all-new 991 series 911. Our own Angus MacKenzie declared the coupe "The Best 911 Ever." And after spending a day twisting and turning in the 911 Cabrio across the dramatic volcanic landscapes of Spain's Grand Canary Island, we found absolutely nothing to suggest otherwise from the coupe's topless twin."
Proof positive, it is a 911! Thank God, I thought I had bought an impostor.
ChuckJ
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz1tHdHPO00
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vividracing
997
11
Oct 6, 2015 03:43 PM
vividracing
Mercedes / AMG
1
Sep 1, 2015 03:16 PM
vividracing
Nissan GTR
0
Aug 19, 2015 02:11 PM





