The eternal dilemma, C2S or C4S? - Page 3 - 6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource

Mar 26, 2013 | 06:56 AM

#31

bluepr0

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2013

Posts: 108

From: Ourense, Spain

Rep Power: 18

Same happens with the rear view using the official Porsche images. They change the perspective so it looks much more wider than what actually is (see side mirrors)

Mar 26, 2013 | 06:58 AM

#32

pyramid

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2012

Posts: 168

From: INA

Rep Power: 30

It is clearly at different perspective, dashboard and rear seat views also different. But the flares after the end of taillights can give us some idea to see the differences

Mar 26, 2013 | 06:59 AM

#33

HotHonda

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 797

From: PNW

Rep Power: 103

Silver car is not a 2S....base Carrera

4 & 4S share the same body

Last edited by HotHonda; Mar 26, 2013 at 07:06 AM.

Mar 26, 2013 | 07:00 AM

#34

bluepr0

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2013

Posts: 108

From: Ourense, Spain

Rep Power: 18

Just another comparison using Official Porsche images, this time the perspective is almost the same

Last edited by bluepr0; Mar 26, 2013 at 07:04 AM.

Mar 26, 2013 | 07:28 AM

#35

buck986

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 2,759

From: NJ

Rep Power: 185

Quote:

Originally Posted by KonaKai

The 991C2S has absolutely no problem putting down its power coming out of corners in the dry

Seeing you drive on the track this is absolutely a true statement.

Mar 26, 2013 | 07:30 AM

#36

buck986

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 2,759

From: NJ

Rep Power: 185

Quote:

Originally Posted by terrence

When I have the car full throttle coming out of tight corners, traction control would come on and power would get reduced intermittently in a C2S. In a C4S, the power just get reallocated partially to the front. I drive in the canyons, so perhaps gravel on the ground creates some slip also. On a race track, probably that would not be the case in the dry.

I think your assessment of the gravel is spot on. On the track coming out of a turn past the apex you should be in a straight line and now transfer of power should be needed.

Mar 26, 2013 | 07:31 AM

#37

buck986

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 2,759

From: NJ

Rep Power: 185

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluepr0

Just another comparison using Official Porsche images, this time the perspective is almost the same

[

Have to admit the rear of the C4S is just great.

Mar 26, 2013 | 08:20 AM

#38

m5_2010

Registered User

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 477

From: NYC

Rep Power: 40

2CS is friskier. It will wag the tail when step on it.... 4SC is just goes and hugs the road. I can understand why the Turbo is always 4 wheel drive... Too much power.

Mar 27, 2013 | 05:20 AM

#39

bluepr0

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2013

Posts: 108

From: Ourense, Spain

Rep Power: 18

Quote:

Originally Posted by m5_2010

2CS is friskier. It will wag the tail when step on it.... 4SC is just goes and hugs the road. I can understand why the Turbo is always 4 wheel drive... Too much power.

Absolutely. My current car is RWD with the engine on the front (SLK 250) and it's fun to drive it, not so fun on wet if you are not careful :P

Mar 27, 2013 | 10:15 AM

#40

gracious_911

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2013

Posts: 87

Rep Power: 17

gracious_911 is infamous around these parts

heres with the 3D configurator:

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluepr0

Same happens with the rear view using the official Porsche images. They change the perspective so it looks much more wider than what actually is (see side mirrors)

Attached Thumbnails